Anthropometric Measurements in 126 Microtia Reconstructions
24 July 2013 (online)
Background Due to its complex, three-dimensional morphology, auricular reconstruction remains one of the most challenging procedures in reconstructive surgery. A subject that remains controversial, however, is the question of the growth potential of the cartilaginous framework. This study explored the anthropometric changes of the reconstructed auricle and the contralateral normal ear in a series of Asian patients.
Methods The records of 126 unilateral microtia patients in three age groups who underwent autogenous costal cartilage auricular reconstruction between 2007 and 2010 were reviewed. The average age was 14 years, and the average follow-up was 2.5 years. The auricular height was measured as the distance from the supra-auricle to the subauricle, and the width was measured as the distance from preauricle to the postauricle. Measurements of the height and width of the reconstructed auricle and the contralateral normal side were taken at implantation and at the final follow-up. Comparisons between the three age groups were performed using a paired Student t test to examine the mean auricular heights and widths for significant interval changes in size.
Results The measurements showed average width increases of 1.24 mm (3.68%) and 1.35 mm (3.91%) in the reconstructed auricles of children and adolescents, respectively, but we did not find obvious changes in the adult group. No significant differences were found in the height measurement of the reconstructed auricle in the three groups. The mature size of the normal ear was reached by age 12, with slowing as patients entered adolescence and adulthood. Comparison of the reconstructed auricle and the contralateral normal ear revealed a very similar growth rate in the adult group. There were average height decreases of 0.77 mm (1.3%) and 1.3 mm (2.09%) in the reconstructed auricles of children and adolescents compared with the normal side. The results showed an average width increase of 1.13 mm (3.15%) in the adolescent group but not in the child or adult groups.
Conclusions The results of this study have generated some useful parameters for the study of growth of the reconstructed auricle and contralateral normal ear. This information serves to clarify the issue of auricular framework fabrication in terms of proper size, especially for Asian patients. Further investigation and analysis are necessary to provide further proof of the graft change.
- 1 Brent B. Microtia repair with rib cartilage grafts: a review of personal experience with 1000 cases. Clin Plast Surg 2002; 29: 257-271 , vii
- 2 Zhang Q, Zhang RH, Xu F, Jin P, Cao Y. Auricular reconstruction for microtia: personal 6-year experience based on 350 microtia ear reconstructions in China. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 123: 849-858
- 3 Chin WS, Zhang RH, Zhang Q, Xu Z, Li D, Wu J. Modifications of three-dimensional costal cartilage framework grafting in auricular reconstruction for microtia. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 124: 1940-1946
- 4 Young F. Cast and precast cartilage grafts. Surgery 1944; 15: 735-748
- 5 Peer LA. Reconstruction of the auricle with diced cartilage grafts in a vitallium ear mold. Plast Reconstr Surg 1948; 3: 653-666
- 6 Kirkham HLD. The use of preserved cartilage in ear reconstruction. Ann Surg 1940; 111: 896-902
- 7 Cronin TD. Use of a silastic frame for total and subtotal reconstruction of the external ear: preliminary reort. Plast Reconstr Surg 1966; 37: 399-405
- 8 Tanzer RC. Total reconstruction of the external ear. Plast Reconstr Surg Transplant Bull 1959; 23: 1-15
- 9 Dupertuis SM. Actual growth of young cartilage transplants in rabbits. Arch Surg 1941; 43: 32-63
- 10 Peer LA, Walker Jr JC. The behavior of autogenous human tissue grafts; a comparative study. 1. Plast Reconstr Surg (1946) 1951; 7: 6-23
- 11 Eisemann ML. The growth potential of autograft cartilage. An experimental study. Arch Otolaryngol 1983; 109: 469-472
- 12 Tanzer RC. Microtia—a long-term follow-up of 44 reconstructed auricles. Plast Reconstr Surg 1978; 61: 161-166
- 13 Thomson HG, Winslow J. Microtia reconstruction: does the cartilage framework grow?. Plast Reconstr Surg 1989; 84: 908-915
- 14 DellaCroce FJ, Green S, Aguilar III EF. Framework growth after reconstruction for microtia: is it real and what are the implications?. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001; 108: 1479-1484 , discussion 1485–1486
- 15 Kizhner V, Barak A. Framework changes using costal cartilage for microtia reconstruction. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008; 134: 768-770
- 16 Nagata S. Modification of the stages in total reconstruction of the auricle: Part I. Grafting the three-dimensional costal cartilage framework for lobule-type microtia. Plast Reconstr Surg 1994; 93 (2) 221-230 , discussion 267–268
- 17 Nagata S. Modification of the stages in total reconstruction of the auricle: Part II. Grafting the three-dimensional costal cartilage framework for concha-type microtia. Plast Reconstr Surg 1994; 93 (2) 231-242 , discussion 267–268
- 18 Nagata S. Modification of the stages in total reconstruction of the auricle: Part III. Grafting the three-dimensional costal cartilage framework for small concha-type microtia. Plast Reconstr Surg 1994; 93 (2) 243-253 , discussion 267–268
- 19 Barut C, Aktunc E. Anthropometric measurements of the external ear in a group of Turkish primary school students. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2006; 30: 255-259
- 20 Alexander KS, Stott DJ, Sivakumar B, Kang N. A morphometric study of the human ear. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2011; 64: 41-47
- 21 Rudderman RH, Guyuron B, Mendelsohn G. The fate of fresh and preserved, noncrushed and crushed autogenous cartilage in the rabbit model. Ann Plast Surg 1994; 32: 250-254
- 22 Ito I, Imada M, Ikeda M, Sueno K, Arikuni T, Kida A. A morphological study of age changes in adult human auricular cartilage with special emphasis on elastic fibers. Laryngoscope 2001; 111: 881-886
- 23 Kalcioglu MT, Miman MC, Toplu Y, Yakinci C, Ozturan O. Anthropometric growth study of normal human auricle. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2003; 67: 1169-1177