J Wrist Surg 2013; 02(04): 346-350
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1358614
Scientific Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Distal Radius Attachments of the Radiocarpal Ligaments: An Anatomical Study

M. A. Zumstein
1   Shoulder, Elbow and Orthopaedics Sports Medicine, Deptartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, University of Bern, Inselspital, Switzerland
,
A. P. Hasan
2   Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Modbury Public Hospital, South Australia, Australia
,
D. T. McGuire
2   Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Modbury Public Hospital, South Australia, Australia
3   Department of Orthopedics and Trauma, Royal Adelaide Hospital, South Australia, Australia
,
Kevin Eng
2   Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Modbury Public Hospital, South Australia, Australia
3   Department of Orthopedics and Trauma, Royal Adelaide Hospital, South Australia, Australia
,
Gregory Ian Bain
2   Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Modbury Public Hospital, South Australia, Australia
3   Department of Orthopedics and Trauma, Royal Adelaide Hospital, South Australia, Australia
4   Discipline of Anatomy and Pathology, University of Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
08 November 2013 (online)

Abstract

Background Understanding the anatomy of the ligaments of the distal radius aids in the surgical repair of ligamentous injuries and the prediction of intraarticular fracture patterns.

Purposes (1) to measure the horizontal and vertical distances of the origins of the radiocarpal ligaments from the most ulnar corner of the sigmoid notch and the joint line, respectively; and (2) to express them as a percentile of the total width of the bony distal radius.

Methods We dissected 8 cadaveric specimens and identified the dorsal radiocarpal, radioscaphocapitate, and the long and short radiolunate ligaments.

Results The dorsal radiocarpal ligament attached from the 16th to the 52nd percentile of the radial width. The radioscaphocapitate ligament attached around the radial styloid from the 86th percentile volarly to the 87th percentile dorsally. The long radiolunate ligament attached from the 59th to the 85th percentile, and the short radiolunate ligament attached from the 14th to the 41st percentile.

Discussion There was a positive correlation between the radial width and the horizontal distance of the ligaments from the sigmoid notch. These findings may aid individualized surgical repair or reconstruction adjusted to patient size and enable further standardized research on distal radial fractures and their relationship with radiocarpal ligaments.

Note

Study performed at the University of Adelaide Ray Last Anatomy Laboratory, South Australia, Australia.


 
  • References

  • 1 Berger RA, Landsmeer JM. The palmar radiocarpal ligaments: a study of adult and fetal human wrist joints. J Hand Surg Am 1990; 15 (6) 847-854
  • 2 Berger RA. The ligaments of the wrist. A current overview of anatomy with considerations of their potential functions. Hand Clin 1997; 13 (1) 63-82
  • 3 Berger RA. The anatomy of the ligaments of the wrist and distal radioulnar joints. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001; (383) 32-40
  • 4 Kijima Y, Viegas SF. Wrist anatomy and biomechanics. J Hand Surg Am 2009; 34 (8) 1555-1563
  • 5 Viegas SF, Yamaguchi S, Boyd NL, Patterson RM. The dorsal ligaments of the wrist: anatomy, mechanical properties, and function. J Hand Surg Am 1999; 24 (3) 456-468
  • 6 Nagao S, Patterson RM, Buford Jr WL, Andersen CR, Shah MA, Viegas SF. Three-dimensional description of ligamentous attachments around the lunate. J Hand Surg Am 2005; 30 (4) 685-692
  • 7 Smith DK. Volar carpal ligaments of the wrist: normal appearance on multiplanar reconstructions of three-dimensional Fourier transform MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1993; 161 (2) 353-357
  • 8 Mizuseki T, Ikuta Y. The dorsal carpal ligaments: their anatomy and function. J Hand Surg [Br] 1989; 14 (1) 91-98 (British and European Volume)
  • 9 Mandziak DG, Watts AC, Bain GI. Ligament contribution to patterns of articular fractures of the distal radius. J Hand Surg Am 2011; 36 (10) 1621-1625
  • 10 Pichler W, Mazzurana P, Clement H, Grechenig S, Mauschitz R, Grechenig W. Frequency of instrument breakage during orthopaedic procedures and its effects on patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008; 90 (12) 2652-2654
  • 11 Prithishkumar IJ , et al. Morphometry of the distal radius–an osteometric study in the Indian population. Indian Journal of Basic & Applied Medical Research 2012; 1 (3) 166-171
  • 12 Schuind FA, Linscheid RL, An KN, Chao EY. A normal data base of posteroanterior roentgenographic measurements of the wrist. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1992; 74 (9) 1418-1429
  • 13 Feipel V, Rooze M. Three-dimensional motion patterns of the carpal bones: an in vivo study using three-dimensional computed tomography and clinical applications. Surg Radiol Anat 1999; 21 (2) 125-131
  • 14 Koh S, Andersen CR, Buford Jr WL, Patterson RM, Viegas SF. Anatomy of the distal brachioradialis and its potential relationship to distal radius fracture. J Hand Surg Am 2006; 31 (1) 2-8
  • 15 Iwamoto A, Morris RP, Andersen C, Patterson RM, Viegas SF. An anatomic and biomechanic study of the wrist extensor retinaculum septa and tendon compartments. J Hand Surg Am 2006; 31 (6) 896-903
  • 16 Nazarian A, Hermannsson BJ, Muller J, Zurakowski D, Snyder BD. Effects of tissue preservation on murine bone mechanical properties. J Biomech 2009; 42 (1) 82-86
  • 17 Currey JD, Brear K, Zioupos P, Reilly GC. Effect of formaldehyde fixation on some mechanical properties of bovine bone. Biomaterials 1995; 16 (16) 1267-1271
  • 18 Ohman C, Dall'Ara E, Baleani M, Van Sint Jan S, Viceconti M. The effects of embalming using a 4% formalin solution on the compressive mechanical properties of human cortical bone. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2008; 23 (10) 1294-1298
  • 19 Cömert A, Kökat AM, Akkocaoğlu M, Tekdemir I, Akça K, Cehreli MC. Fresh-frozen vs. embalmed bone: is it possible to use formalin-fixed human bone for biomechanical experiments on implants?. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20 (5) 521-525