Radiation Risk of Lung Cancer Screening

Luba Frank; Emmanuel Christodoulou; Ella A. Kazerooni

doi:10.1055/s-0033-1358615

Seminars in Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Table of Contents

Semin Respir Crit Care Med 2013; 34(06): 738-747
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1358615

Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Radiation Risk of Lung Cancer Screening

Authors

Luba Frank

¹Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Health System, Taubman Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan
Emmanuel Christodoulou

²Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan
Ella A. Kazerooni

³Division of Cardiothoracic Radiology, University of Michigan Health System Cardiovascular Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan

Abstract

Lung cancer screening with low dose computed tomography (CT) is the only method ever proven to reduce lung cancer–specific mortality in high-risk current and former cigarette smokers. Radiation exposure from annual screening CT examinations and subsequent CT and nuclear medicine testing to further evaluate positive screening CTs is sometimes raised as a reason to avoid screening and is often misunderstood. With all testing, there are potential benefits and risks. As we sit on the brink of widespread adoption of lung cancer screening CT, we aim to explain why the risks associated with radiation exposure from lung cancer screening are very low and should not be used to avoid screening or dissuade individuals who qualify for screening CT to participate in a lung cancer screening program.

Keywords

lung cancer - screening - computed tomography - radiation exposure - relative risk

Full Text

References

References
1 Aberle DR, Adams AM, Berg CD , et al; National Lung Screening Trial Research Team. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med 2011; 365 (5) 395-409
2 Pinsky D, Black WC. National Lung Cancer Trial (NLST) Subset Analysis. Washington, DC: National Cancer Institute's Board of Scientific Advisors and National Cancer Advisory Board; 2013
3 Darby S, Hill D, Doll R. Radon: a likely carcinogen at all exposures. Ann Oncol 2001; 12 (10) 1341-1351
4 dos Santos Silva I, De Stavola B, Pizzi C, Evans AD, Evans SA. Cancer incidence in professional flight crew and air traffic control officers: disentangling the effect of occupational versus lifestyle exposures. Int J Cancer 2013; 132 (2) 374-384
5 O'Brien K, Friedberg W, Sauer HH, Smart DF. Atmospheric cosmic rays and solar energetic particles at aircraft altitudes. Environ Int 1996; 22 (Suppl. 01) S9-S44
6 Bacher K, Smeets P, Bonnarens K, De Hauwere A, Verstraete K, Thierens H. Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003; 181 (4) 923-929
7 United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 10 CFR Part 20—Standards for Protection Against Radiation. Available at: http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/cfr/part020/full-text.html
8 National Council on Radiation Protection & Measurements Exposure of the U.S. Population from Diagnostic Medical Radiation; 1989. Report No. 100. Available at: http://www.ncrppublications.org/Reports/100
9 Schauer DA . Magnitude of Radiation Uses and Doses in the US: NCRP Scientific Committee 6–2 Analysis of Medical Exposures; 2008. Available at: http://www.ncrponline.org/PDFs/2008/ICR_2008_DAS.pdf
10 Mettler Jr FA, Huda W, Yoshizumi TT, Mahesh M. Effective doses in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine: a catalog. Radiology 2008; 248 (1) 254-263
11 Smith-Bindman R, Miglioretti DL, Johnson E , et al. Use of diagnostic imaging studies and associated radiation exposure for patients enrolled in large integrated health care systems, 1996-2010. JAMA 2012; 307 (22) 2400-2409
12 Melamed MR, Flehinger BJ, Zaman MB, Heelan RT, Perchick WA, Martini N. Screening for early lung cancer. Results of the Memorial Sloan-Kettering study in New York. Chest 1984; 86 (1) 44-53
13 Melamed MR. Lung cancer screening results in the National Cancer Institute New York study. Cancer 2000; 89 (11, Suppl) 2356-2362
14 Marcus PM, Bergstralh EJ, Fagerstrom RM , et al. Lung cancer mortality in the Mayo Lung Project: impact of extended follow-up. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000; 92 (16) 1308-1316
15 Strauss GM, Gleason RE, Sugarbaker DJ. Screening for lung cancer re-examined. A reinterpretation of the Mayo Lung Project randomized trial on lung cancer screening. Chest 1993; 103 (4, Suppl) 337S-341S
16 Marcus PM, Bergstralh EJ, Zweig MH, Harris A, Offord KP, Fontana RS. Extended lung cancer incidence follow-up in the Mayo Lung Project and overdiagnosis. J Natl Cancer Inst 2006; 98 (11) 748-756
17 Fontana RS, Sanderson DR, Taylor WF , et al. Early lung cancer detection: results of the initial (prevalence) radiologic and cytologic screening in the Mayo Clinic study. Am Rev Respir Dis 1984; 130 (4) 561-565
18 Frost JK, Ball Jr WC, Levin ML , et al. Early lung cancer detection: results of the initial (prevalence) radiologic and cytologic screening in the Johns Hopkins study. Am Rev Respir Dis 1984; 130 (4) 549-554
19 Tockman MS. Survival and mortality from lung-cancer in a screened population—the Johns-Hopkins Study. Chest 1986; 89 (4_Supplement): 324S-325S
20 Flehinger BJ, Melamed MR, Zaman MB, Heelan RT, Perchick WB, Martini N. Early lung cancer detection: results of the initial (prevalence) radiologic and cytologic screening in the Memorial Sloan-Kettering study. Am Rev Respir Dis 1984; 130 (4) 555-560
21 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Lung Cancer Screening: Current Recommendation. Washington, DC: USPSTF; 2004
22 Aberle DR, Berg CD, Black WC , et al; National Lung Screening Trial Research Team. The National Lung Screening Trial: overview and study design. Radiology 2011; 258 (1) 243-253
23 Cagnon CH, Cody DD, McNitt-Gray MF, Seibert JA, Judy PF, Aberle DR. Description and implementation of a quality control program in an imaging-based clinical trial. Acad Radiol 2006; 13 (11) 1431-1441
24 Cody DD, Kim HJ, Cagnon CH , et al. Normalized CT dose index of the CT scanners used in the National Lung Screening Trial. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010; 194 (6) 1539-1546
25 Funama Y, Taguchi K, Awai K, Sakabe D, Shimamura M, Yamashita Y. Image noise and radiation dose using an automatic tube current modulation technique at 64-detector computed tomography: effect of off-center patient position, bowtie filter type, and scan projection radiograph. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2009; 33 (6) 973-977
26 Yamada Y, Jinzaki M, Tanami Y , et al. Model-based iterative reconstruction technique for ultralow-dose computed tomography of the lung: a pilot study. Invest Radiol 2012; 47 (8) 482-489
27 Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Ogden CL, Curtin LR. Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999-2008. JAMA 2010; 303 (3) 235-241
28 National Research Council (U.S.). Committee to Assess Health Risks from Exposure to Low Level of Ionizing Radiation. Health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation: BEIR VII Phase 2. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2006
29 Gilbert ES, Cragle DL, Wiggs LD. Updated analyses of combined mortality data for workers at the Hanford Site, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, and Rocky Flats Weapons Plant. Radiat Res 1993; 136 (3) 408-421
30 Howe GR, Zablotska LB, Fix JJ, Egel J, Buchanan J. Analysis of the mortality experience amongst U.S. nuclear power industry workers after chronic low-dose exposure to ionizing radiation. Radiat Res 2004; 162 (5) 517-526
31 Kendall GM, Muirhead CR, MacGibbon BH , et al. Mortality and occupational exposure to radiation: first analysis of the National Registry for Radiation Workers. BMJ 1992; 304 (6821) 220-225
32 Muirhead CR, Goodill AA, Haylock RG , et al. Occupational radiation exposure and mortality: second analysis of the National Registry for Radiation Workers. J Radiol Prot 1999; 19 (1) 3-26
33 Carpenter L, Higgins C, Douglas A, Fraser P, Beral V, Smith P. Combined analysis of mortality in three United Kingdom nuclear industry workforces, 1946-1988. Radiat Res 1994; 138 (2) 224-238
34 Ashmore JP, Krewski D, Zielinski JM, Jiang H, Semenciw R, Band PR. First analysis of mortality and occupational radiation exposure based on the National Dose Registry of Canada. Am J Epidemiol 1998; 148 (6) 564-574
35 Sont WN, Zielinski JM, Ashmore JP , et al. First analysis of cancer incidence and occupational radiation exposure based on the National Dose Registry of Canada. Am J Epidemiol 2001; 153 (4) 309-318
36 Yukio Epidemiological Study Group of Nuclear Workers (Japan). First analysis of mortality of nuclear industry workers in Japan, 1986–1992. Jpn J Health Phys 1997; 32 (2) 173-184
37 International Agency for Research on Cancer. Direct estimates of cancer mortality due to low doses of ionising radiation: an international study. IARC Study Group on Cancer Risk among Nuclear Industry Workers. Lancet 1994; 344 (8929) 1039-1043
38 Cardis E, Gilbert ES, Carpenter L , et al. Effects of low doses and low dose rates of external ionizing radiation: cancer mortality among nuclear industry workers in three countries. Radiat Res 1995; 142 (2) 117-132
39 Gilbert ES, Koshurnikova NA, Sokolnikov M , et al. Liver cancers in Mayak workers. Radiat Res 2000; 154 (3) 246-252
40 Koshurnikova NA, Gilbert ES, Sokolnikov M , et al. Bone cancers in Mayak workers. Radiat Res 2000; 154 (3) 237-245
41 Kreisheimer M, Koshurnikova NA, Nekolla E , et al. Lung cancer mortality among male nuclear workers of the Mayak facilities in the former Soviet Union. Radiat Res 2000; 154 (1) 3-11
42 Shilnikova NS, Preston DL, Ron E , et al. Cancer mortality risk among workers at the Mayak nuclear complex. Radiat Res 2003; 159 (6) 787-798
43 International Commission on Radiological Protection. 1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection: Adopted by the Commission in November 1990. Annals of the ICRP, Vol 21, no. 1–3. ICRP publication , 60. New York, NY: Published for the Commission by Pergamon; 1991
44 United Nations. Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. Sources, effects and risks of ionizing radiation: 1988 report to the General Assembly, with annexes. New York, NY: United Nations; 1988
45 United Nations. Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. Sources and effects of ionizing radiation: United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation: UNSCEAR 2000 report to the General Assembly, with scientific annexes. New York, NY: United Nations; 2000
46 Thompson DE, Mabuchi K, Ron E , et al. Cancer incidence in atomic bomb survivors. Part II: Solid tumors, 1958-1987. Radiat Res 1994; 137 2, Suppl): S17-S67
47 Preston DL, Pierce DA, Shimizu Y , et al. Effect of recent changes in atomic bomb survivor dosimetry on cancer mortality risk estimates. Radiat Res 2004; 162 (4) 377-389
48 Preston DL, Shimizu Y, Pierce DA, Suyama A, Mabuchi K. Studies of mortality of atomic bomb survivors. Report 13: Solid cancer and noncancer disease mortality: 1950-1997. Radiat Res 2003; 160 (4) 381-407
49 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Report of the NCI-CDC Working Group to revise the 1985 NIH Radioepidemiological Tables. Bethesda, MD: NIH; 2003. . Report No. 03–5387
50 Howe GR. Lung cancer mortality between 1950 and 1987 after exposure to fractionated moderate-dose-rate ionizing radiation in the Canadian fluoroscopy cohort study and a comparison with lung cancer mortality in the Atomic Bomb survivors study. Radiat Res 1995; 142 (3) 295-304
51 Pierce DA, Sharp GB, Mabuchi K. Joint effects of radiation and smoking on lung cancer risk among atomic bomb survivors. Radiat Res 2003; 159 (4) 511-520
52 National Comprehensive Cancer Network Lung Cancer Screening Guideline.; June 12, 2013. Available at: http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/lung_screening.pdf
53 Brenner DJ. Radiation risks potentially associated with low-dose CT screening of adult smokers for lung cancer. Radiology 2004; 231 (2) 440-445
54 Interactive RadioEpidemiological Program IREP v.5.7. https://www.niosh-irep.com/irep_niosh . Accessed September 8, 2013