Mechanical and Physiological Examination of Barefoot and Shod Conditions in Female Runners

Abstract

Barefoot running and running using minimalist footwear have become increasingly popular in recent years. Footwear choice may affect running mechanics and the metabolic cost of running. To investigate these factors, 8 well-trained, female distance runners (mean age=20.1±1.4 years) were recruited to participate in the study. Following orientation to testing procedures, subjects completed 3 running economy tests on separate days. Treatment order (barefoot, minimalist footwear and running shoe) was counter-balanced. Each testing session consisted of a 5-min warm-up at 2.24 m · s⁻¹, followed by the 7-min RE test at 3.13 m · s⁻¹. Biomechanical data were collected at the 3-min mark for 10 s, and expired gases were collected from minutes 5–7. One-way repeated measures ANOVA revealed a statistically significant difference for running economy (p=0.04), expressed as relative oxygen uptake per km in the barefoot condition (running shoe: 204.51±2.84; minimalist footwear: 198.21±3.04; barefoot: 193.26±3.62 ml · kg⁻¹· km⁻¹) vs. running shoe. The other physiological and biomechanical variables were not statistically significant (p>0.05). However, moderate to large effect sizes suggested there were biomechanical changes that ensured between conditions. It should be further evaluated whether these mechanical adjustments and the running economy trend would translate into improved distance race performance while running barefoot or with minimalist footwear.

Key words

running economy - minimalist footwear - gait mechanics

• References

• 1 Barrett R, Noordegraaf MV, Morrison S. Gender differences in the variability of lower extremity kinematics during treadmill locomotion. J Mot Behav 2008; 40: 62-70
• 2 Braunstein D, Arampatzis A, Eysel P, Bruggeman GT. Footwear affects the gearing at the ankle and knee joints during running. J Biomech 2010; 43: 2120-2125
• 3 Burkett LN, Kohrt WM, Buchbinder R. Effects of shoes and foot orthotics on VO2 and selected frontal plane knee kinematics. Med Sci Sports Exer 1985; 17: 158-163
• 4 Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2^nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Earlbaum; 1989
• 5 De Clercq D, Aerts P, Kunnen M. The mechanical characteristics of the human heel pad during foot strike in running: an in vivo cineradiographic study. J Biomech 1994; 27: 1213-1222
• 6 de Koning JJ. Adaptations in running kinematics and kinetics due to shoes and playing surfaces. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Sport Surfaces. A symposium of the University of Calgary. Calgary: University of Calgary; Aug 18-21 1992
• 7 De Wit B, De Clerq D, Aerts P. Biomechanical analysis of the stance phase during barefoot and shod running. J Biomech 2000; 33: 269-278
• 8 Di Prampero PE, Capelli C, Pagliaro P, Antonutto G, Girardis M, Zamparo P, Soule RG. Energetics of best performances in middle-distance running. J Appl Physiol 1993; 74: 2318-2324
• 9 Divert C, Mornieux G, Baur H, Mayer F, Belli A. Mechanical comparision of barefoot and shod running. Int J Sports Med 2005; 26: 593-598
• 10 Divert C, Mornieux G, Freychat P, Baly L, Mayer F, Belli A. Barefoot-shod running differences: Shoe or mass effect?. Int J Sports Med 2008; 29: 512-518
• 11 Ferber R, Davis IM, Williams III DS. Gender differences in lower extremity mechanics during running. Clin Biomech 2003; 18: 350-357
• 12 Frederick EC. Physiological and ergonomics factors in running shoe design. Appl Ergon 1984; 15: 281-287
• 13 Goss DL, Gross MT. A review of mechanics and injury trends among various running styles. US Army Med Depart J 2012; 62-71
• 14 Hamill J, Freedson PS, Clarkson PM, Braun B. Muscle soreness during running: Biomechanical and physiological considerations. Int J Sport Biomech 1991; 7: 125-137
• 15 Hamill J, Russell EM, Gruber AH, Miller R. Impact characteristics in shod and barefoot running. Footwear Sci 2011; 3: 33-40
• 16 Hanson NJ, Berg K, Deka P, Meendering JR, Ryan C. Oxygen cost of running barefoot vs. running shod. Int J Sports Med 2011; 32: 401-406
• 17 Harriss DJ, Atkinson G. Ethical standards in sport and exercise science research: 2014 update. Int J Sports Med 2013; 34: 1025-1028
• 18 Jenkins DW, Cauthon DJ. Barefoot running claims and controversies: a review of the literature. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 2011; 101: 231-246
• 19 Lavacanska V, Taylor NF, Schache AG. Familiarization to treadmill running in young unimpaired adults. Hum Movement Sci 2005; 24: 544-557
• 20 Lorenz DS, Pontillo M. Is there evidence to support a forefoot strike pattern in barefoot runners? A review. Sports Health 2012; 4: 480-484
• 21 Malinzak RA, Colby SM, Kirkendall DT, Yu B, Garrett WE. A comparison of knee joint motion patterns between men and women in selected athletic tasks. Clin Biomech 2001; 16: 438-445
• 22 McCarthy C, Fleming N, Donne B, Blanksby B. 12 weeks of simulated barefoot running changes foot-strike patterns in female runners. Int J Sports Med. 2013 DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1353215
• 23 Nigg B. Biomechanical consideration on barefoot movement and barefoot shoe concepts. Footwear Sci 2009; 1: 73-79
• 24 Novacheck T. The biomechanics of running. Gait Posture 1998; 7: 77-95
• 25 Perl DP, Daoud AI, Lieberman DE. Effects of footwear and strike type on running economy. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2012; 44: 1335-1343
• 26 Robbins S, Hanna AM. Running-related injury prevention through barefoot adaptations. Med Sci Sport Exerc 1987; 19: 148-156
• 27 Rodgers MM, Leveau BF. Effectiveness of foot orthotic devices used to modify pronation in runners. J Orthop Sport Phys 1982; 4: 86-90
• 28 Saunders P, Pyne DB, Telford RD, Hawley JA. Factors affecting running economy in trained distance runners. Sports Med 2004; 34: 465-485
• 29 Squadrone R, Gallozzi C. Biomechanical and physiological comparison of barefoot and two shod conditions in experienced barefoot runners. J Sports Med Phy Fit 2009; 49: 6-13
• 30 Williams K, Cavanagh PR. Relationship between distance running mechanics, running economy, and performance. J Appl Physiol 1987; 63: 1236-1245