Abstract
We sought to determine the incidence of ‘true’ VO2max confirmation with the verification procedure across different protocols. 12 active
participants (men n=6, women n=6) performed in random order 4 different maximal graded
exercises tests (GXT) and verification bout protocols on 4 separate days. Conditions
for the rest period and verification bout intensity were: A – 105% intensity, 20 min
rest; B – 105% intensity, 60 min rest; C – 115% intensity, 20 min rest; D – 115% intensity,
60 min rest. VO2max confirmation (difference between peak VO2 GXT and verification trial<±3%) using the verification trial was 12/12 (100%), 12/12
(100%), 8/12 (66.70%), and 7/12 (58.33%) for protocols A, B, C, and D. There was a
significant (p<0.05) effect of verification intensity on VO2max confirmation across all exercise test conditions (intensity effect within recovery
20 min (χ2 (1)=4.800, p<0.05), intensity effect within recovery 60 min (χ2 (1)=6.316, p<0.05)). No significant effect was found for incidence of VO2max confirmation with different rest periods. We recommend the use of 105% of the
maximal GXT workload and 20 min rest periods when using verification trials to confirm
VO2max in normally active populations.
Key words
exercise test - exercise - oxygen consumption - physical fitness