Anterior-only Partial Sacrectomy for en bloc Resection of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
26 January 2014
17 March 2014
28 April 2014 (eFirst)
Study Design Case report.
Objective The usual procedure for partial sacrectomies in locally advanced rectal cancer combines a transabdominal and a posterior sacral route. The posterior approach is flawed with a high rate of complications, especially infections and wound-healing problems. Anterior-only approaches have indirectly been mentioned within long series of rectal cancer surgery. We describe a case of partial sacrectomy for en bloc resection of a locally advanced rectal cancer with invasion of the low sacrum through a combined transabdominal and perineal approach without any posterior incision.
Methods Through a midline laparotomy, the tumor was dissected and the sacral osteotomy was performed. Once the sacrum was mobile, the muscular attachments to its posterior wall were cut through the perineal approach. This latter route was also used to remove the whole specimen.
Results The postoperative period was uneventful in terms of infection and wound healing, but the patient developed right foot dorsiflexion paresis that completely disappeared in 1 month. Resection margins were negative. After a follow-up of 18 months, the patient has no local recurrence but presented lung and liver metastases.
Conclusion In cases of rectal cancer involving the low sacrum, the combination of a transabdominal and a perineal route to carry out the partial sacrectomy is a feasible approach that avoids changes of surgical positioning and the morbidity related to posterior incisions. This strategy should be considered when deciding on undertaking partial sacrectomy in locally advanced rectal cancer.
- 1 Hsieh PC, Xu R, Sciubba DM , et al. Long-term clinical outcomes following en bloc resections for sacral chordomas and chondrosarcomas: a series of twenty consecutive patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009; 34 (20) 2233-2239
- 2 Ramamurthy R, Bose JC, Muthusamy V, Natarajan M, Kunjithapatham D. Staged sacrectomy—an adaptive approach. J Neurosurg Spine 2009; 11 (3) 285-294
- 3 Nelson H, Petrelli N, Carlin A , et al; National Cancer Institute Expert Panel. Guidelines 2000 for colon and rectal cancer surgery. J Natl Cancer Inst 2001; 93 (8) 583-596
- 4 Nakafusa Y, Tanaka T, Tanaka M, Kitajima Y, Sato S, Miyazaki K. Comparison of multivisceral resection and standard operation for locally advanced colorectal cancer: analysis of prognostic factors for short-term and long-term outcome. Dis Colon Rectum 2004; 47 (12) 2055-2063
- 5 Randall RL, Bruckner J, Lloyd C, Pohlman TH, Conrad III EU. Sacral resection and reconstruction for tumors and tumor-like conditions. Orthopedics 2005; 28 (3) 307-313
- 6 Han IH, Seo YJ, Cho WH, Choi BK. Computer-assisted modified mid-sacrectomy for en bloc resection of chordoma and preservation of bladder function. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2011; 50 (6) 523-527
- 7 Yamazaki T, McLoughlin GS, Patel S, Rhines LD, Fourney DR. Feasibility and safety of en bloc resection for primary spine tumors: a systematic review by the Spine Oncology Study Group. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009; 34 (22, Suppl): S31-S38
- 8 Wanebo HJ, Marcove RC. Abdominal sacral resection of locally recurrent rectal cancer. Ann Surg 1981; 194 (4) 458-471
- 9 Melton GB, Paty PB, Boland PJ , et al. Sacral resection for recurrent rectal cancer: analysis of morbidity and treatment results. Dis Colon Rectum 2006; 49 (8) 1099-1107
- 10 Tjandra JJ, Kilkenny JW, Buie WD , et al; Standards Practice Task Force; American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons. Practice parameters for the management of rectal cancer (revised). Dis Colon Rectum 2005; 48 (3) 411-423
- 11 Lopez MJ. Multivisceral resections for colorectal cancer. J Surg Oncol 2001; 76 (1) 1-5
- 12 Vermaas M, Ferenschild FTJ, Verhoef C , et al. Total pelvic exenteration for primary locally advanced and locally recurrent rectal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2007; 33 (4) 452-458
- 13 Law WL, Chu KW, Choi HK. Total pelvic exenteration for locally advanced rectal cancer. J Am Coll Surg 2000; 190 (1) 78-83
- 14 Guo Y, Palmer JL, Shen L , et al. Bowel and bladder continence, wound healing, and functional outcomes in patients who underwent sacrectomy. J Neurosurg Spine 2005; 3 (2) 106-110
- 15 Benevento BT, Sipski ML. Neurogenic bladder, neurogenic bowel, and sexual dysfunction in people with spinal cord injury. Phys Ther 2002; 82 (6) 601-612
- 16 Carter MF, Dalton DP, Garnett JE. The double-barreled wet colostomy: long-term experience with the first 11 patients. J Urol 1994; 152 (6 Pt 2) 2312-2315
- 17 Kuhrt MP, Chokshi RJ, Arrese D, Martin Jr EW. Retrospective review of pelvic malignancies undergoing total pelvic exenteration. World J Surg Oncol 2012; 10: 110
- 18 Zileli M, Hoscoskun C, Brastianos P, Sabah D. Surgical treatment of primary sacral tumors: complications associated with sacrectomy. Neurosurg Focus 2003; 15 (5) E9
- 19 Yang H-L, Chen K-W, Wang G-L , et al. Pre-operative transarterial embolization for treatment of primary sacral tumors. J Clin Neurosci 2010; 17 (10) 1280-1285
- 20 Ng SS, Leung WW, Wong CY , et al. Quality of life after laparoscopic vs open sphincter-preserving resection for rectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19 (29) 4764-4773
- 21 Hugate Jr RR, Dickey ID, Phimolsarnti R, Yaszemski MJ, Sim FH. Mechanical effects of partial sacrectomy: when is reconstruction necessary?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006; 450 (450) 82-88
- 22 Yu B, Zheng Z, Zhuang X , et al. Biomechanical effects of transverse partial sacrectomy on the sacroiliac joints: an in vitro human cadaveric investigation of the borderline of sacroiliac joint instability. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009; 34 (13) 1370-1375
- 23 Wiatrek RL, Thomas JS, Papaconstantinou HT. Perineal wound complications after abdominoperineal resection. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2008; 21 (1) 76-85