Download PDF
Endoscopy 2014; 46(10): 897-915
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1378092
Guideline
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Clinical indications for computed tomographic colonography: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) Guideline

Cristiano Spada
1   Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
,
Jaap Stoker
2   Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
,
Onofre Alarcon
3   Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de La Laguna, La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain
,
Federico Barbaro
1   Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
,
Davide Bellini
4   Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome; I.C.O.T. Hospital, Latina, Italy
,
Michael Bretthauer
5   Department of Health Economy and Health Management, University of Oslo, and Department of Transplantation Medicine, Gastroenterology Unit, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
,
Margriet C. De Haan
2   Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
,
Jean-Marc Dumonceau
6   Gedyt Endoscopy Center, Buenos Aires, Argentina
,
Monika Ferlitsch
7   Department of Internal Medicine III, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
,
Steve Halligan
8   Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, London, UK
,
Emma Helbren
8   Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, London, UK
,
Mikael Hellstrom
9   Department of Radiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital and Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
,
Ernst J. Kuipers
10   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
,
Philippe Lefere
11   Virtual Colonoscopy Teaching Centre, Hooglede, Belgium, and AZ Delta, Roeselare, Belgium
,
Thomas Mang
12   Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
,
Emanuele Neri
13   Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
,
Lucio Petruzziello
1   Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
,
Andrew Plumb
8   Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, London, UK
,
Daniele Regge
14   Institute for Cancer Research and Treatment, Candiolo-Torino, Italy
,
Stuart A. Taylor
8   Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, London, UK
,
Cesare Hassan
1   Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
,
Andrea Laghi
4   Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome; I.C.O.T. Hospital, Latina, Italy
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

submitted 18 August 2014

accepted after revision 25 August 2014

Publication Date:
30 September 2014 (online)

Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

This is an official guideline of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and the European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR). It addresses the clinical indications for the use of computed tomographic colonography (CTC). A targeted literature search was performed to evaluate the evidence supporting the use of CTC. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system was adopted to define the strength of recommendations and the quality of evidence.

Main recommendations

1 ESGE/ESGAR recommend computed tomographic colonography (CTC) as the radiological examination of choice for the diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia. ESGE/ESGAR do not recommend barium enema in this setting (strong recommendation, high quality evidence).

2 ESGE/ESGAR recommend CTC, preferably the same or next day, if colonoscopy is incomplete. Delay of CTC should be considered following endoscopic resection. In the case of obstructing colorectal cancer, preoperative contrast-enhanced CTC may also allow location or staging of malignant lesions (strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence).

3 When endoscopy is contraindicated or not possible, ESGE/ESGAR recommend CTC as an acceptable and equally sensitive alternative for patients with symptoms suggestive of colorectal cancer (strong recommendation, high quality evidence).

4 ESGE/ESGAR recommend referral for endoscopic polypectomy in patients with at least one polyp ≥ 6 mm in diameter detected at CTC. CTC surveillance may be clinically considered if patients do not undergo polypectomy (strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence).

5 ESGE/ESGAR do not recommend CTC as a primary test for population screening or in individuals with a positive first-degree family history of colorectal cancer (CRC). However, it may be proposed as a CRC screening test on an individual basis providing the screenee is adequately informed about test characteristics, benefits, and risks (weak recommendation, moderate quality evidence).

This is an official guideline of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and the European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR), published in Endoscopy and European Radiology simultaneously. It addresses the clinical indications for the use of computed tomographic colonography (CTC). A targeted literature search was performed to evaluate the evidence supporting the use of CTC. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system was adopted to define the strength of recommendations and the quality of evidence.


Appendix e1 and e2

 

  • References

  • 1 Edwards BK, Ward E, Kohler BA et al. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975–2006, featuring colorectal cancer trends and impact of interventions (risk factors, screening, and treatment) to reduce future rates. Cancer 2010; 116: 544-573
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Ferlay J, Autier P, Boniol M et al. Estimates of the cancer incidence and mortality in Europe in 2006. Ann Oncol 2007; 18: 581-592
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Towler BP, Irwig L, Glasziou P et al. Screening for colorectal cancer using the faecal occult blood test, hemoccult. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000; CD001216, CD001216 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Hewitson P, Glasziou P, Watson E et al. Cochrane systematic review of colorectal cancer screening using the fecal occult blood test (hemoccult): an update. Am J Gastroenterol 2008; 103: 1541-1549
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Zauber AG, Winawer SJ, O'Brien MJ et al. Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. N Engl J Med 2012; 366: 687-696
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Rembacken B, Hassan C, Riemann JF et al. Quality in screening colonoscopy: position statement of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE). Endoscopy 2012; 44: 957-968
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Neri E, Halligan S, Hellstrom M et al. The second ESGAR consensus statement on CT colonography. Eur Radiol 2013; 23: 720-729
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Vining D, Galfand D, Bechtold R. Technical feasibility of colon imaging with helical CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994; 162: 104
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Atkins D, Best D, Briss PA et al. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 2004; 328: 1490
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Dumonceau JM, Hassan C, Riphaus A et al. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline Development Policy. Endoscopy 2012; 44: 626-629
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Halligan S, Wooldrage K, Dadswell E et al. Computed tomographic colonography versus barium enema for diagnosis of colorectal cancer or large polyps in symptomatic patients (SIGGAR): a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet 2013; 381: 1185-1193
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Stoop EM, de Haan MC, de Wijkerslooth TR et al. Participation and yield of colonoscopy versus non-cathartic CT colonography in population-based screening for colorectal cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 2012; 13: 55-64
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Atkin W, Dadswell E, Wooldrage K et al. Computed tomographic colonography versus colonoscopy for investigation of patients with symptoms suggestive of colorectal cancer (SIGGAR): a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet 2013; 381: 1194-1202
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Johnson CD, Chen MH, Toledano AY et al. Accuracy of CT colonography for detection of large adenomas and cancers. N Engl J Med 2008; 359: 1207-1217
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Regge D, Laudi C, Galatola G et al. Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomographic colonography for the detection of advanced neoplasia in individuals at increased risk of colorectal cancer. JAMA 2009; 301: 2453-2461
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Lefere P, Silva C, Gryspeerdt S et al. Teleradiology based CT colonography to screen a population group of a remote island; at average risk for colorectal cancer. Eur J Radiol 2013; 82: e262-e267
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Graser A, Stieber P, Nagel D et al. Comparison of CT colonography, colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy and faecal occult blood tests for the detection of advanced adenoma in an average risk population. Gut 2009; 58: 241-248
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I et al. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 2003; 349: 2191-2200
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Sosna J, Morrin MM, Kruskal JB et al. CT colonography of colorectal polyps: a metaanalysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003; 181: 1593-1598
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Chaparro M, Gisbert JP, Del Campo L et al. Accuracy of computed tomographic colonography for the detection of polyps and colorectal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Digestion 2009; 80: 1-17
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Mulhall BP, Veerappan GR, Jackson JL. Meta-analysis: computed tomographic colonography. Ann Intern Med 2005; 142: 635-650
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Pickhardt PJ, Hassan C, Halligan S et al. Colorectal cancer: CT colonography and colonoscopy for detection--systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiology 2011; 259: 393-405
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Halligan S, Altman DG, Taylor SA et al. CT colonography in the detection of colorectal polyps and cancer: systematic review, meta-analysis, and proposed minimum data set for study level reporting. Radiology 2005; 237: 893-904
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 de Haan MC, van Gelder RE, Graser A et al. Diagnostic value of CT-colonography as compared to colonoscopy in an asymptomatic screening population: a meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 2011; 21: 1747-1763
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Plumb AA, Halligan S, Pendse DA et al. Sensitivity and specificity of CT colonography for the detection of colonic neoplasia after positive faecal occult blood testing: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 2014; 24: 1049-1058
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Rosman AS, Korsten MA. Meta-analysis comparing CT colonography, air contrast barium enema, and colonoscopy. Am J Med 2007; 120: 203-210 .e204
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Winawer SJ, Stewart ET, Zauber AG et al. A comparison of colonoscopy and double-contrast barium enema for surveillance after polypectomy. National Polyp Study Work Group. N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 1766-1772
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Rockey DC, Paulson E, Niedzwiecki D et al. Analysis of air contrast barium enema, computed tomographic colonography, and colonoscopy: prospective comparison. Lancet 2005; 365: 305-311
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Sosna J, Sella T, Sy O et al. Critical analysis of the performance of double-contrast barium enema for detecting colorectal polyps > or = 6 mm in the era of CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008; 190: 374-385
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Neri E, Faggioni L, Cerri F et al. CT colonography versus double-contrast barium enema for screening of colorectal cancer: comparison of radiation burden. Abdom Imaging 2010; 35: 596-601
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Shah HA, Paszat LF, Saskin R et al. Factors associated with incomplete colonoscopy: a population-based study. Gastroenterology 2007; 132: 2297-2303
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Aslinia F, Uradomo L, Steele A et al. Quality assessment of colonoscopic cecal intubation: an analysis of 6 years of continuous practice at a university hospital. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 721-731
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Baxter NN, Sutradhar R, Forbes SS et al. Analysis of administrative data finds endoscopist quality measures associated with postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 2011; 140: 65-72
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Hassan C, Bretthauer M, Kaminski MF et al. Bowel preparation for colonoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guideline. Endoscopy 2013; 45: 142-150
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Gawron AJ, Veerappan A, McCarthy ST et al. Impact of an incomplete colonoscopy referral program on recommendations after incomplete colonoscopy. Dig Dis Sci 2013; 58: 1849-1855 DOI: 10.1007/s10620–013–2605–1.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Pullens HJ, van Leeuwen MS, Laheij RJ et al. CT-colonography after incomplete colonoscopy: what is the diagnostic yield?. Dis Colon Rectum 2013; 56: 593-599
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Salamone I, Buda C, Arcadi T et al. Role of virtual colonoscopy following incomplete optical colonoscopy: our experience. G Chir 2011; 32: 388-393
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Neerincx M, Terhaar sive Droste JS, Mulder CJ et al. Colonic work-up after incomplete colonoscopy: significant new findings during follow-up. Endoscopy 2010; 42: 730-735
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Iafrate F, Hassan C, Zullo A et al. CT colonography with reduced bowel preparation after incomplete colonoscopy in the elderly. Eur Radiol 2008; 18: 1385-1395
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Copel L, Sosna J, Kruskal JB et al. CT colonography in 546 patients with incomplete colonoscopy. Radiology 2007; 244: 471-478
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Morrin MM, Kruskal JB, Farrell RJ et al. Endoluminal CT colonography after an incomplete endoscopic colonoscopy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999; 172: 913-918
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Yucel C, Lev-Toaff AS, Moussa N et al. CT colonography for incomplete or contraindicated optical colonoscopy in older patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008; 190: 145-150
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Macari M, Berman P, Dicker M et al. Usefulness of CT colonography in patients with incomplete colonoscopy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999; 173: 561-564
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Neri E, Giusti P, Battolla L et al. Colorectal cancer: role of CT colonography in preoperative evaluation after incomplete colonoscopy. Radiology 2002; 223: 615-619
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Luo M, Shan H, Zhou K. CT virtual colonoscopy in patients with incomplete conventional colonoscopy. Chin Med J 2002; 115: 1023-1026
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Lai C, Sammour T, Roadley G et al. CT colonography in a rural New Zealand hospital. N Z Med J 2009; 122: 67-73
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Hough DM, Kuntz MA, Fidler JL et al. Detection of occult colonic perforation before CT colonography after incomplete colonoscopy: perforation rate and use of a low-dose diagnostic scan before CO2 insufflation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008; 191: 1077-1081
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Kim SY, Park SH, Choi EK et al. Automated carbon dioxide insufflation for CT colonography: effectiveness of colonic distention in cancer patients with severe luminal narrowing. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008; 190: 698-706
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Maglinte DD, Strong RC, Strate RW et al. Barium enema after colorectal biopsies: experimental data. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1982; 139: 693-697
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Harned RK, Williams SM, Maglinte DD et al. Clinical application of in vitro studies for barium-enema examination following colorectal biopsy. Radiology 1985; 154: 319-321
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Harned RK, Consigny PM, Cooper NB et al. Barium enema examination following biopsy of the rectum or colon. Radiology 1982; 145: 11-16
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Wytock DH, Baybick J. Depth of colorectal biopsies with proctoscopic forceps. Gastrointest Endosc 1987; 33: 15-17
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Mulder SA, Kranse R, Damhuis RA et al. Prevalence and prognosis of synchronous colorectal cancer: a Dutch population-based study. Cancer Epidemiol 2011; 35: 442-447
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Latournerie M, Jooste V, Cottet V et al. Epidemiology and prognosis of synchronous colorectal cancers. Br J Surg 2008; 95: 1528-1533
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Kim MS, Park YJ. Detection and treatment of synchronous lesions in colorectal cancer: the clinical implication of perioperative colonoscopy. World J Gastroenterol 2007; 13: 4108-4111
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Heald RJ, Bussey HJ. Clinical experiences at St. Mark's Hospital with multiple synchronous cancers of the colon and rectum. Dis Colon Rectum 1975; 18: 6-10
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Achiam MP, Burgdorf SK, Wilhelmsen M et al. Inadequate preoperative colonic evaluation for synchronous colorectal cancer. Scand J Surg 2009; 98: 62-67
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Park SH, Lee JH, Lee SS et al. CT colonography for detection and characterisation of synchronous proximal colonic lesions in patients with stenosing colorectal cancer. Gut 2012; 61: 1716-1722
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Leksowski K, Rudzinska M, Rudzinski J. Computed tomographic colonography in preoperative evaluation of colorectal tumors: a prospective study. Surg Endosc 2011; 25: 2344-2349
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 60 Kim JH, Kim WH, Kim TI et al. Incomplete colonoscopy in patients with occlusive colorectal cancer: usefulness of CT colonography according to tumor location. Yonsei Med J 2007; 48: 934-941
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 61 Galia M, Midiri M, Carcione A et al. [Usefulness of CT colonography in the preoperative evaluation of patients with distal occlusive colorectal carcinoma]. [Article in Italian]. Radiol Med 2001; 101: 235-242
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 62 Fenlon HM, McAneny DB, Nunes DP et al. Occlusive colon carcinoma: virtual colonoscopy in the preoperative evaluation of the proximal colon. Radiology 1999; 210: 423-428
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 63 Coccetta M, Migliaccio C, La Mura F et al. Virtual colonoscopy in stenosing colorectal cancer. Ann Surg Innov Res 2009; 3: 11
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 64 Jellema P, van der Windt DA, Bruinvels DJ et al. Value of symptoms and additional diagnostic tests for colorectal cancer in primary care: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2010; 340
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 65 White TJ, Avery GR, Kennan N et al. Virtual colonoscopy vs conventional colonoscopy in patients at high risk of colorectal cancer – a prospective trial of 150 patients. Colorectal Dis 2009; 11: 138-145
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 66 Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH, Meiners RJ et al. Colorectal and extracolonic cancers detected at screening CT colonography in 10,286 asymptomatic adults. Radiology 2010; 255: 83-88
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 67 Heresbach D, Manfredi S, D'Halluin PN et al. Review in depth and meta-analysis of controlled trials on colorectal cancer screening by faecal occult blood test. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006; 18: 427-433
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 68 Atkin WS, Edwards R, Kralj-Hans I et al. Once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening in prevention of colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2010; 375: 1624-1633
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 69 Segnan N, Armaroli P, Bonelli L et al. Once-only sigmoidoscopy in colorectal cancer screening: follow-up findings of the Italian Randomized Controlled Trial – SCORE. J Natl Cancer Inst 2011; 103: 1310-1322
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 70 Kim YS, Kim N, Kim SH et al. The efficacy of intravenous contrast-enhanced 16-raw multidetector CT colonography for detecting patients with colorectal polyps in an asymptomatic population in Korea. J Clin Gastroenterol 2008; 42: 791-798
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 71 Macari M, Bini EJ, Jacobs SL et al. Colorectal polyps and cancers in asymptomatic average-risk patients: evaluation with CT colonography. Radiology 2004; 230: 629-636
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 72 Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I et al. Nonadenomatous polyps at CT colonography: prevalence, size distribution, and detection rates. Radiology 2004; 232: 784-790
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 73 Johns LE, Houlston RS. A systematic review and meta-analysis of familial colorectal cancer risk. Am J Gastroenterol 2001; 96: 2992-3003
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 74 Fini L, Laghi L, Hassan C et al. Noncathartic CT colonography to screen for colorectal neoplasia in subjects with a family history of colorectal cancer. Radiology 2014; 270: 784-790
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 75 Leggett B, Whitehall V. Role of the serrated pathway in colorectal cancer pathogenesis. Gastroenterology 2010; 138: 2088-2100
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 76 Hol L, Wilschut JA, van Ballegooijen M et al. Screening for colorectal cancer: random comparison of guaiac and immunochemical faecal occult blood testing at different cut-off levels. Br J Cancer 2009; 100: 1103-1110
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 77 Lin OS, Kozarek RA, Gluck M et al. Preference for colonoscopy versus computerized tomographic colonography: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. J Gen Intern Med 2012; 27: 1349-1360
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 78 de Haan MC, de Wijkerslooth TR, Stoop E et al. Informed decision-making in colorectal cancer screening using colonoscopy or CT-colonography. Patient Educ Couns 2013; 91: 318-325
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 79 de Wijkerslooth TR, de Haan MC, Stoop EM et al. Reasons for participation and nonparticipation in colorectal cancer screening: a randomized trial of colonoscopy and CT colonography. Am J Gastroenterol 2012; 107: 1777-1783
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 80 Ho W, Broughton DE, Donelan K et al. Analysis of barriers to and patients' preferences for CT colonography for colorectal cancer screening in a nonadherent urban population. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010; 195: 393-397
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 81 Pooler BD, Baumel MJ, Cash BD et al. Screening CT colonography: multicenter survey of patient experience, preference, and potential impact on adherence. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012; 198: 1361-1366
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 82 Moawad FJ, Maydonovitch CL, Cullen PA et al. CT colonography may improve colorectal cancer screening compliance. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010; 195: 1118-1123
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 83 de Wijkerslooth TR, de Haan MC, Stoop EM et al. Burden of colonoscopy compared to non-cathartic CT-colonography in a colorectal cancer screening programme: randomised controlled trial. Gut 2012; 61: 1552-1559
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 84 Pendse DA, Taylor SA. Complications of CT colonography: a review. Eur J Radiol 2013; 82: 1159-1165
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 85 Holme O, Bretthauer M, Fretheim A et al. Flexible sigmoidoscopy versus faecal occult blood testing for colorectal cancer screening in asymptomatic individuals. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 9: CD009259
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 86 Bellini D, Rengo M, De Cecco CN et al. Perforation rate in CT colonography: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 2014; 24: 1487-1496 DOI: 10.1007/s00330–014–3190–1.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 87 Brenner DJ, Elliston CD. Estimated radiation risks potentially associated with full-body CT screening. Radiology 2004; 232: 735-738
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 88 Perisinakis K, Seimenis I, Tzedakis A et al. Screening computed tomography colonography with 256-slice scanning: should patient radiation burden and associated cancer risk constitute a major concern?. Invest Radiol 2012; 47: 451-456
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 89 Berrington de Gonzalez A, Kim KP, Knudsen AB et al. Radiation-related cancer risks from CT colonography screening: a risk-benefit analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011; 196: 816-823
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 90 Boellaard TN, Venema HW, Streekstra GJ et al. Effective radiation dose in CT colonography: is there a downward trend?. Acad Radiol 2012; 19: 1127-1133
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 91 Chang KJ, Caovan DB, Grand DJ et al. Reducing radiation dose at CT colonography: decreasing tube voltage to 100 kVp. Radiology 2013; 266: 791-800
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 92 Park SK, Park DI, Lee SY et al. Extracolonic findings of computed tomographic colonography in Koreans. World J Gastroenterol 2009; 15: 1487-1492
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 93 Yee J, Kumar NN, Godara S et al. Extracolonic abnormalities discovered incidentally at CT colonography in a male population. Radiology 2005; 236: 519-526
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 94 Chin M, Mendelson R, Edwards J et al. Computed tomographic colonography: prevalence, nature, and clinical significance of extracolonic findings in a community screening program. Am J Gastroenterol 2005; 100: 2771-2776
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 95 Veerappan GR, Ally MR, Choi JH et al. Extracolonic findings on CT colonography increases yield of colorectal cancer screening. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010; 195: 677-686
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 96 Macari M, Nevsky G, Bonavita J et al. CT colonography in senior versus nonsenior patients: extracolonic findings, recommendations for additional imaging, and polyp prevalence. Radiology 2011; 259: 767-774
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 97 Kim YS, Kim N, Kim SY et al. Extracolonic findings in an asymptomatic screening population undergoing intravenous contrast-enhanced computed tomography colonography. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008; 23: e49-e57
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 98 Pickhardt PJ, Hanson ME, Vanness DJ et al. Unsuspected extracolonic findings at screening CT colonography: clinical and economic impact. Radiology 2008; 249: 151-159
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 99 Flicker MS, Tsoukas AT, Hazra A et al. Economic impact of extracolonic findings at computed tomographic colonography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2008; 32: 497-503
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 100 Gluecker TM, Johnson CD, Wilson LA et al. Extracolonic findings at CT colonography: evaluation of prevalence and cost in a screening population. Gastroenterology 2003; 124: 911-916
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 101 Sonnenberg A, Delco F, Bauerfeind P. Is virtual colonoscopy a cost-effective option to screen for colorectal cancer?. Am J Gastroenterol 1999; 94: 2268-2274
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 102 Hewitson P, Glasziou P, Irwig L et al. Screening for colorectal cancer using the faecal occult blood test, Hemoccult. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; CD001216 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001216.pub2.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 103 Kuipers EJ, Rosch T, Bretthauer M. Colorectal cancer screening – optimizing current strategies and new directions. Nat Reviews Clin Oncol 2013; 10: 130-142
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 104 Wilschut JA, Hol L, Dekker E et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of a quantitative immunochemical test for colorectal cancer screening. Gastroenterology 2011; 141: 1648-1655 e1641
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 105 Heresbach D, Djabbari M, Riou F et al. Accuracy of computed tomographic colonography in a nationwide multicentre trial, and its relation to radiologist expertise. Gut 2011; 60: 658-665
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 106 Liedenbaum MH, van Rijn AF, de Vries AH et al. Using CT colonography as a triage technique after a positive faecal occult blood test in colorectal cancer screening. Gut 2009; 58: 1242-1249
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 107 Liedenbaum MH, de Vries AH, van Rijn AF et al. CT colonography with limited bowel preparation for the detection of colorectal neoplasia in an FOBT positive screening population. Abdom Imaging 2010; 35: 661-668
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 108 Sali L, Falchini M, Della MonicaP et al. CT colonography before colonoscopy in subjects with positive faecal occult blood test. Preliminary experience. Radiol Med 2010; 115: 1267-1278
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 109 Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, van Ballegooijen M, Zauber AG et al. At what costs will screening with CT colonography be competitive? A cost-effectiveness approach. Int J Cancer 2009; 124: 1161-1168
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 110 Sali L, Grazzini G, Ventura L et al. Computed tomographic colonography in subjects with positive faecal occult blood test refusing optical colonoscopy. Dig Liver Dis 2013; 45: 285-289
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 111 Plumb AA, Halligan S, Nickerson C et al. Use of CT colonography in the English Bowel Cancer Screening Programme. Gut 2013; 63: 964-973 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2013–304697.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 112 Manfredi S, Bouvier AM, Lepage C et al. Incidence and patterns of recurrence after resection for cure of colonic cancer in a well defined population. Br J Surg 2006; 93: 1115-1122
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 113 Schoemaker D, Black R, Giles L et al. Yearly colonoscopy, liver CT, and chest radiography do not influence 5-year survival of colorectal cancer patients. Gastroenterology 1998; 114: 7-14
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 114 Rex DK, Kahi CJ, Levin B et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after cancer resection: a consensus update by the American Cancer Society and the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology 2006; 130: 1865-1871
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 115 Kobayashi H, Mochizuki H, Sugihara K et al. Characteristics of recurrence and surveillance tools after curative resection for colorectal cancer: a multicenter study. Surgery 2007; 141: 67-75
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 116 Kim HJ, Park SH, Pickhardt PJ et al. CT colonography for combined colonic and extracolonic surveillance after curative resection of colorectal cancer. Radiology 2010; 257: 697-704
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 117 Fletcher JG, Johnson CD, Krueger WR et al. Contrast-enhanced CT colonography in recurrent colorectal carcinoma: feasibility of simultaneous evaluation for metastatic disease, local recurrence, and metachronous neoplasia in colorectal carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002; 178: 283-290
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 118 Laghi A, Iannaccone R, Bria E et al. Contrast-enhanced computed tomographic colonography in the follow-up of colorectal cancer patients: a feasibility study. Eur Radiol 2003; 13: 883-889
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 119 Leonardou P, Striggaris K, Pappas P et al. Screening of patients after colectomy: virtual colonography. Abdom Imaging 2006; 31: 521-528
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 120 You YT, Chang Chien CC, Wang JY et al. Evaluation of contrast-enhanced computed tomographic colonography in detection of local recurrent colorectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2006; 12: 123-126
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 121 Amitai MM, Fidder H, Avidan B et al. Contrast-enhanced CT colonography with 64-slice MDCT compared to endoscopic colonoscopy in the follow-up of patients after colorectal cancer resection. Clin Imaging 2009; 33: 433-438
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 122 Neri E, Vagli P, Turini F et al. Post-surgical follow-up of colorectal cancer: role of contrast-enhanced CT colonography. Abdom Imaging 2010; 35: 669-675 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-009-9596-6.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 123 Lee JH, Park SH, Lee SS et al. CT colonography in patients who have undergone sigmoid colostomy: a feasibility study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011; 197: W653-W657
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 124 Hassan C, Quintero E, Dumonceau JM et al. Post-polypectomy colonoscopy surveillance: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy 2013; 45: 842-851
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 125 Colquhoun P, Chen HC, Kim JI et al. High compliance rates observed for follow up colonoscopy post polypectomy are achievable outside of clinical trials: efficacy of polypectomy is not reduced by low compliance for follow up. Colorectal Dis 2004; 6: 158-161
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 126 Taylor DP, Cannon-Albright LA, Sweeney C et al. Comparison of compliance for colorectal cancer screening and surveillance by colonoscopy based on risk. Genet Med 2011; 13: 737-743
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 127 Rapuri S, Spencer J, Eckels D. Importance of postpolypectomy surveillance and postpolypectomy compliance to follow-up screening--review of literature. Int J Colorectal Dis 2008; 23: 453-459
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 128 Cooper GS, Kou TD, Barnholtz Sloan JS et al. Use of colonoscopy for polyp surveillance in Medicare beneficiaries. Cancer 2013; 119: 1800-1807
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 129 Khan JSKJS, Moran BJ. Iatrogenic perforation at colonic imaging. Colorectal Dis 2011; 13: 481-493
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 130 Berrington de Gonzalez A, Kim KP, Yee J. CT colonography: perforation rates and potential radiation risks. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2010; 20: 279-291
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 131 Atalla MA, Rozen WM, Master M et al. Education and Imaging. Colonic perforation during 'virtual' CT colonography. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009; 24: 1800
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 132 Regge D, Neri E, Turini F et al. Role of CT colonography in inflammatory bowel disease. Eur J Radiol 2009; 69: 404-408
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 133 Wong SH, Wong VWS, Sung JJY. Virtual colonoscopy-induced perforation in a patient with Crohn’s disease. World J Gastroenterol 2007; 13: 978-979
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 134 Belo-Oliveira P, Curvo-Semedo L, Rodrigues H et al. Sigmoid colon perforation at CT colonography secondary to a possible obstructive mechanism: Report of a case. Dis Colon Rectum 2007; 50: 1478-1480
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 135 Coady-Fariborzian L, Angel LP, Procaccino JA. Perforated colon secondary to virtual colonoscopy: Report of a case. Dis Colon Rectum 2004; 47: 1247-1249
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 136 Triester SL, Hara AK, Young-Fadok TM et al. Colonic perforation after computed tomographic colonography in a patient with fibrostenosing Crohn’s disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 189-192
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 137 Young BM, Fletcher JG, Earnest F et al. Colonic perforation at CT colonography in a patient without known colonic disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006; 186: 119-121
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 138 Debugne G, Gillet B, Pierard S et al. [Colonic perforation after virtual colonoscopy]. [Article in French]. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 2006; 30: 1103-1105
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 139 Ganesh S, Pathma-Nathan N, Loder P. Colonic perforation from computed tomographic colonography: A real complication from a virtual procedure. Surgical Practice 2009; 13: 58-59
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 140 Bassett JT, Liotta RA, Barlow D et al. Colonic perforation during screening CT colonography using automated CO2 insufflation in an asymptomatic adult. Abdom Imaging 2008; 33: 598-600
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 141 Hassan C, Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH et al. Systematic review: distribution of advanced neoplasia according to polyp size at screening colonoscopy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2010; 31: 210-217
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 142 Rex DK, Kahi C, O’Brien M et al. The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy PIVI (Preservation and Incorporation of Valuable Endoscopic Innovations) on real-time endoscopic assessment of the histology of diminutive colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73: 419-422
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 143 Hoff G, Foerster A, Vatn MH et al. Epidemiology of polyps in the rectum and colon. Recovery and evaluation of unresected polyps 2 years after detection. Scand J Gastroenterol 1986; 21: 853-862
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 144 Hofstad B, Vatn MH, Andersen SN et al. Growth of colorectal polyps: redetection and evaluation of unresected polyps for a period of three years. Gut 1996; 39: 449-456
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 145 Hisabe T, Tsuda S, Matsui T et al. Natural history of small colorectal protuberant adenomas. Dig Endosc 2010; 22: 43-46
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 146 Pickhardt PJ, Hain KS, Kim DH et al. Low rates of cancer or high-grade dysplasia in colorectal polyps collected from computed tomography colonography screening. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010; 8: 610-615
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 147 Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH, Pooler BD et al. Assessment of volumetric growth rates of small colorectal polyps with CT colonography: a longitudinal study of natural history. Lancet Oncol 2013; 14: 711-720 DOI: 10.1016/S1470–2045(13)70216-X.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 148 Kolligs FT, Crispin A, Graser A et al. Risk factors for advanced neoplasia within subcentimetric polyps: implications for diagnostic imaging. Gut 2013; 62: 863-870 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2011–300111.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 149 Lieberman D, Moravec M, Holub J et al. Polyp size and advanced histology in patients undergoing colonoscopy screening: implications for CT colonography. Gastroenterology 2008; 135: 1100-1105
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 150 Taylor SA, Slater A, Burling DN et al. CT colonography: optimisation, diagnostic performance and patient acceptability of reduced-laxative regimens using barium-based faecal tagging. Eur Radiol 2008; 18: 32-42
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 151 Lefere PA, Gryspeerdt SS, Dewyspelaere J et al. Dietary fecal tagging as a cleansing method before CT colonography: initial results polyp detection and patient acceptance. Radiology 2002; 224: 393-403
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 152 Hixson LJ, Fennerty MB, Sampliner RE et al. Prospective blinded trial of the colonoscopic miss-rate of large colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc 1991; 37: 125-127
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 153 Pickhardt PJ, Nugent PA, Mysliwiec PA et al. Location of adenomas missed by optical colonoscopy. Ann Intern Med 2004; 141: 352-359
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 154 Rex DK, Overhiser AJ, Chen SC et al. Estimation of impact of American College of Radiology recommendations on CT colonography reporting for resection of high-risk adenoma findings. Am J Gastroenterol 2009; 104: 149-153
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 155 Gupta N, Bansal A, Rao D et al. Prevalence of advanced histological features in diminutive and small colon polyps. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: 1022-1030
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 156 Bose M, Bell J, Jackson L et al. Virtual vs. optical colonoscopy in symptomatic gastroenterology out-patients: the case for virtual imaging followed by targeted diagnostic or therapeutic colonoscopy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2007; 26: 727-736
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 157 Cotton PB, Durkalski VL, Pineau BC et al. Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): a multicenter comparison with standard colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasia. JAMA 2004; 291: 1713-1719
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 158 Fisichella VA, Jaderling F, Horvath S et al. Primary three-dimensional analysis with perspective-filet view versus primary two-dimensional analysis: evaluation of lesion detection by inexperienced readers at computed tomographic colonography in symptomatic patients. Acta Radiol 2009; 50: 244-255
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 159 Hoppe H, Netzer P, Spreng A et al. Prospective comparison of contrast enhanced CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasms in a single institutional study using second-look colonoscopy with discrepant results. Am J Gastroenterol 2004; 99: 1924-1935
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 160 Kalra N, Suri S, Bhasin DK et al. Comparison of multidetector computed tomographic colonography and conventional colonoscopy for detection of colorectal polyps and cancer. Indian J Gastroenterol 2006; 25: 229-232
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 161 Laghi A, Iannaccone R, Carbone I et al. Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): blinded prospective comparison with conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal neoplasia. Endoscopy 2002; 34: 441-446
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 162 Munikrishnan V, Gillams AR, Lees WR et al. Prospective study comparing multislice CT colonography with colonoscopy in the detection of colorectal cancer and polyps. Dis Colon Rectum 2003; 46: 1384-1390
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 163 Ozsunar Y, Coskun G, Delibas N et al. Diagnostic accuracy and tolerability of contrast enhanced CT colonoscopy in symptomatic patients with increased risk for colorectal cancer. Eur J Radiol 2009; 71: 513-518
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 164 Pfeifer GK, Corleta O, Gus P. [Evaluation of computed tomographic colonography for detection of colorectal polyps]. [Article in Portuguese]. Arq Gastroenterol 2008; 45: 301-307
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 165 Regge D, Galatola G, Martincich L et al. [Use of virtual endoscopy with computerized tomography in the identification of colorectal neoplasms. Prospective study with symptomatic patients]. Radiol Med 2000; 99: 449-455
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 166 Roberts-Thomson IC, Tucker GR, Hewett PJ et al. Single-center study comparing computed tomography colonography with conventional colonoscopy. World J Gastroenterol 2008; 14: 469-473
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 167 Taylor SA, Halligan S, Saunders BP et al. Use of multidetector-row CT colonography for detection of colorectal neoplasia in patients referred via the Department of Health "2-Week-wait" initiative. Clin Radiol 2003; 58: 855-861
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 168 Vogt C, Cohnen M, Beck A et al. Detection of colorectal polyps by multislice CT colonography with ultra-low-dose technique: comparison with high-resolution videocolonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 60: 201-209
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar