Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr 2014; 82(11): 616-626
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1384915
Übersicht
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Das Ontario Domestic Assault Risk Assessment (ODARA) – Validität und autorisierte deutsche Übersetzung eines Screening-Instruments für Risikobeurteilungen bei Intimpartnergewalt

The Ontario Domestic Assault Risk Assessment (ODARA) – Validity und Authorised German Translation of an Intimate Partner Violence Screening Tool
J. Gerth
,
A. Rossegger
,
F. Urbaniok
,
J. Endrass
Further Information

Publication History

19 May 2014

10 July 2014

Publication Date:
10 November 2014 (online)

Zusammenfassung

Weltweit wird durchschnittlich jede dritte Frau Opfer von Intimpartnergewalt. Viele Frauen sind wiederholt betroffen. Um dem Risiko erneuter Gewalt effizient zu begegnen, ist ein reliables und valides Instrument zur Risikobeurteilung notwendig. Bis heute wurden mehrere Risk-Assessment-Instrumente spezifisch für den Kontext der Intimpartnergewalt publiziert. Eine besondere Anforderung an diese Instrumente ist der breite Kontext, in dem die Instrumente in der Praxis zur Anwendung kommen (z. B. bei Polizei, in Kliniken und Opferberatungsstellen), um entsprechende Fälle zuverlässig triagieren zu können. Ziel der Entwicklung des kanadischen Ontario Domestic Assault Risk Assessment (ODARA) war es, ein ökonomisches Instrument für die Triage von Niedrigrisiko- und Hochrisiko-Tätern von Intimpartnergewalt bereitzustellen. Bisherige Validierungsstudien weisen auf eine moderate bis gute Trennschärfe des ODARA hin, wobei robuste Befunde für den deutschsprachigen Raum noch ausstehen. In der vorliegenden Arbeit wird eine wissenschaftliche und von den Autoren der Originalversion autorisierte Übersetzung des Instruments vorgestellt.

Abstract

On average one third of all women are victimised by intimate partner violence at least once in their life. Many women are affected repeatedly. To efficiently reduce the risk of repeated violence a reliable and valid risk assessment is needed. To date several risk assessment tools have been published in the field of intimate partner violence. There is a strong demand for such tools to be applicable by a wider range of practitioners (e. g., police officers, hospital and victim services’ staff) to reliably assess cases of intimate partner violence and recommend further interventions. By developing the Ontario Domestic Assault Risk Assessment (ODARA) it was the authors’ aim to provide a brief risk assessment tool which can be scored on the basis of only few and easily collectable information and which efficiently discriminates between low-risk and high-risk offenders of intimate partner violence. Previous replication studies found moderate to good and on average higher power of discrimination of the ODARA compared to other risk assessment tools in the field. However, for the German speaking countries robust findings are still lacking. In the present publication a scientific and authorised translation of the ODARA is provided.

 
  • Literatur

  • 1 World Health Organisation. Global and regional estimates of violence against women: prevalence and health effects of intimate partner violence and non-partner sexual violence. In: Geneva: Department of reproductive health and research; 2013
  • 2 Agentur der Europäischen Union für Grundrechte. Gewalt gegen Frauen: Eine EU-weite Erhebung. In: Luxemburg: 2014
  • 3 Bundesministerium des Innern. Polizeiliche Kriminalstatistik 2012, Bundesrepublik Deutschland. In: Berlin: 2013
  • 4 Bundesamt für Statistik Schweiz. Polizeiliche Kriminalstatistik. In: Schweiz: 2014
  • 5 Gloor D, Meier H. Repräsentativbefragung bei Patientinnen der Maternité Inselhof Triemli, Klinik für Geburtshilfe und Gynäkologie, Zürich. In: Frauen, Gesundheit und Gewalt im sozialen Nahraum: Büro für die Gleichstellung von Frau und Mann der Stadt Zürich und Maternité Inselhof Triemli; 2004
  • 6 Bundesamt für Statistik Schweiz. Tötungsdelikte in der Partnerschaft. In: Statistik der Schweiz. Neuchâtel: Bundesamt für Statistik Schweiz; 2008
  • 7 Holtzworth-Munroe A, Meehan JC, Herron K et al. Do subtypes of maritally violent men continue to differ over time?. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 2003; 71: 728-740
  • 8 Kilvinger F, Rossegger A, Urbaniok F et al. Risikokalkulation bei häuslicher Gewalt. Fortschritte der Neurologie – Psychiatrie 2012; 80: 312-319
  • 9 Campbell JC, Webster DW, Glass N. The Danger Assessment: Validation of a lethality risk assessment instrument for intimate partner femicide. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 2009; 24: 653-674
  • 10 Kropp PR, Hart SD, Webster CW et al. Manual for the Spousal Assault Risk Assessment Guide. 2. Aufl. Vancouver: BC: British Columbia Institute on Family Violence; 1995
  • 11 Williams KR, Houghton AB. Assessing the risk of domestic violence re-offending: A validation study. Law and Human Behavior 2004; 28: 437-455
  • 12 Quinsey VL, Harris GT, Rice ME et al. Violent offenders: Appraising and managing risk. 2. Aufl.. Washington DC: American Psychological Association; 2006
  • 13 Hilton NZ, Harris GT, Rice ME. Risk assessment for domestically violent men. Washington DC: American Psychological Association; 2010
  • 14 Hanson RK, Morton-Bourgon KE. The accuracy of recidivism risk assessments for sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of 118 prediction studies. Psychological Assessment 2009; 21: 1-21
  • 15 Messing JT, Thaller J. The Average Predictive Validity of Intimate Partner Violence Risk Assessment Instruments. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 2013; 28: 1537-1558
  • 16 Hilton NZ, Harris GT, Rice ME et al. A brief actuarial assessment for the prediction of wife assault recidivism: The Ontario Domestic Assault Risk Assessment. Psychological Assessment 2004; 16: 267-275
  • 17 Hilton NZ, Simmons JL. The influence of actuarial risk assessment in clinical judgments and tribunal decisions about mentally disordered offenders in maximum security. Law and Human Behavior 2001; 25: 393-408
  • 18 Hilton NZ, Harris GT, Rice ME et al. Training front-line users in the Ontario Domestic Assault Risk Assessment (ODARA): A tool for police domestic investigations. The Canadian Journal of Police & Security Services 2007; 5: 92-96
  • 19 Waypoint. ODARA 101 Bibliography. In. Penetanguishene: ON: Waypoint Centre for Mental Health Care; 2014
  • 20 Endrass J, Urbaniok F, Held L et al. Accuracy of the Static-99 in predicting recidivism in Switzerland. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 2009; 53: 482-490
  • 21 Rossegger A, Endrass J, Gerth J et al. Replicating the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide: A total forensic cohort study. PLoS One 2014; 9: 1-8
  • 22 Hilton NZ, Harris GT, Popham S et al. Risk assessment among incarcerated male domestic violence offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior 2010; 37: 815-832
  • 23 Hilton NZ, Harris GT. How nonrecidivism affects predictive accuracy: Evidence from a cross-validation of the Ontario Domestic Assault Risk Assessment. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 2009; 24: 326-337
  • 24 Rice ME, Harris GT. Comparing effect sizes in follow-up studies: ROC Area, Cohen's d, and r. Law and Human Behavior 2005; 29: 615-620
  • 25 Rettenberger M, Eher R. Actuarial risk assessment in sexually motivated intimate partner violence. Law and Human Behavior 2013; 37: 75-86
  • 26 Eke AW, Hilton NZ, Harris GT et al. Intimate partner homicide: Risk assessment and prospects for prediction. Journal of Family and Violence 2011; 26: 211-216
  • 27 Hilton NZ, Harris GT, Rice ME et al. An indepth actuarial assessment for wife assault recidivism: The Domestic Violence Risk Appraisal Guide. Law and Human Behavior 2008; 32: 150-163
  • 28 Hilton NZ, Popham S, Lang C et al. Preliminary validation of the ODARA for female intimate partner violence offenders. Partner Abuse 2014; 5: 189-203
  • 29 Rossegger A, Gerth J, Seewald K et al. Current obstacles in replicating risk assessment findings: A systematic review of commonly used actuarial instrument. Behavioral Sciences & the Law 2013; 31: 154-164
  • 30 Folkes SEF, Hilton NZ, Harris GT. Weapon use increases the severity of domestic violence but neither weapon use nor firearm access increases the risk or severity of recidivism. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 2013; 28: 1143-1156
  • 31 Hilton NZ, Harris GT, Rice ME. The effect of arrest on wife assault recidivism: Controlling for pre-arrest risk. Criminal Justice and Behavior 2007; 34: 1334-1344
  • 32 Hilton NZ, Harris GT, Holder N. Actuarial assessment of violence risk in hospital-based partner assault clinics. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research 2008; 40: 56-70
  • 33 Olszowy L, Jaffe PG, Campbell M et al. Effectiveness of risk assessment tools in differentiating child homicides from other domestic homicide cases. Journal of Child Custody 2013; 10: 185-206
  • 34 Rettenberger M, Gaunersdorfer K, Eher R. Deutsche Übersetzung und Adaption des Ontario Domestic Assault Risk Assessment. Wien: Österreich: Verein für forensische Forschung und Weiterbildung; 2009
  • 35 Mental Health Centre Penetanguishene. Ontario Domestic Assault Risk Assessment: General Scoring Criteria. Penetanguishene: ON Canada; 2005