Adverse events of NOTES mediastinoscopy compared to conventional video-assisted mediastinoscopy: a randomized survival study in a porcine model

Background: Safety is a concern in natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) mediastinoscopy. The objective of this study was to compare the safety of NOTES mediastinoscopy with video-assisted mediastinoscopy (VAM).

Methods: Twenty-four pigs were randomly assigned to NOTES or VAM. Thirty-minute mediastinoscopies were performed with the identification of seven predetermined structures. The animals were euthanized after 7 days and necropsy was performed.

Results: Mediastinoscopy was not possible in one animal in each group. There were more intraoperative adverse events with NOTES than VAM (7 vs. 2, P = 0.04); hemorrhage was the most frequent adverse event (4 and 1, respectively). At necropsy, pathological findings were observed in 13 animals (9 NOTES and 4 VAM; P = 0.03). Inflammatory parameters were not different between groups and were not related to adverse events.

Conclusion: Systematic NOTES mediastinoscopy is possible and comparable to VAM in terms of number of organs identified and inflammatory impact. However, the safety profile of NOTES mediastinoscopy has to be improved before it can be adopted in a clinical setting.

• References

• 1 Turner BG, Gee DW, Cizginer S et al. Endoscopic transesophageal mediastinal lymph node dissection and en bloc resection by using mediastinal and thoracic approaches (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 72: 831-835
• 2 Córdova H, Martinez-Pallí G, Fernández-Esparrach G. Feasibility of systematic transesophageal endoscopic mediastinoscopy. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013; 61: 486-488
• 3 Fritscher-Ravens A, Patel K, Ghanbari A et al. Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) in the mediastinum: long-term survival animal experiments in transesophageal access, including minor surgical procedures. Endoscopy 2007; 39: 870-875
• 4 Yan TD, Black D, Bannon PG et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and nonrandomized trials on safety and efficacy of video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 2009; 16: 2152-2165
• 5 Willingham FF, Gee DW, Lauwers GY et al. Natural orifice transesophageal mediastinoscopy and thoracoscopy. Surg Endosc 2008; 22: 1042-1047
• 6 Gee DW, Willingham FF, Lauwers GY et al. Natural orifice transesophageal mediastinoscopy and thoracoscopy: a survival series in swine. Surg Endosc 2008; 22: 2117-2122
• 7 Venissac N, Alifano M, Mouroux J. Video-assisted mediastinoscopy: experience from 240 consecutive cases. Ann Thorac Surg 2003; 76: 208-212
• 8 von Delius S, Wilhelm D, Feussner H et al. Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: cardiopulmonary safety of transesophageal mediastinoscopy. Endoscopy 2010; 42: 405-412
• 9 Navarro-Ripoll R, Córdova H, Rodríguez-D’Jesús A et al. Cardiorespiratory impact of transesophageal endoscopic mediastinoscopy compared to cervical mediastinoscopy: a randomized experimental study. Surg Innov 2014; 21: 487-495
• 10 Mathews JC, Chin MS, Fernandez-Esparrach G et al. Early healing of transcolonic and transgastric natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery access sites. J Am Coll Surg 2010; 210: 480-490
• 11 Sumiyama K, Gostout CJ, Rajan E et al. Transesophageal mediastinoscopy by submucosal endoscopy with mucosal flap safety valve technique. Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 65: 679-683
• 12 Fritscher-Ravens A, Ghanbari A, Cuming T et al. Comparative study of NOTES alone vs. EUS-guided NOTES procedures. Endoscopy 2008; 40: 925-930
• 13 Córdova H, San José Estépar R, Rodríguez-D'Jesús A et al. Comparative study of NOTES alone versus NOTES guided by a new image registration system for navigation in the mediastinum: a study in a porcine model. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 77: 102-107
• 14 Moreira-Pinto J, Ferreira A, Miranda A et al. Transesophageal pulmonary lobectomy with single transthoracic port assistance: study with survival assessment in a porcine model. Endoscopy 2012; 44: 354-361
• 15 Grund KE, Lehmann TG. Transesophageal NOTES – a critical analysis of relevant problems. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 2010; 19: 252-256
• 16 Inoue H, Minami H, Kobayashi Y et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal achalasia. Endoscopy 2010; 42: 265-271
• 17 Guarner-Argente C, Beltrán M, Martínez-Pallí G et al. Infection during natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery peritoneoscopy: a randomized comparative study in a survival porcine model. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2011; 18: 741-746
• 18 Silvestri GA, Hoffmann BJ, Bhutani MS et al. Endoscopic ultrasound with fine needle aspiration in the diagnosis and staging of lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 1996; 61: 1441-1446
• 19 Pasricha PJ, Hawari R, Ahmed I et al. Submucosal endoscopic esophageal myotomy: a novel experimental approach for the treatment of achalasia. Endoscopy 2007; 39: 761-764