Eur J Pediatr Surg 2016; 26(02): 160-163
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1396414
Original Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Impact of Epidural Failures on the Results of a Prospective, Randomized Trial

Amita Desai
1   Department of Surgery, Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, Missouri, United States
,
Hanna Alemayehu
1   Department of Surgery, Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, Missouri, United States
,
Kathryn A. Weesner
2   Department of Anesthesia, Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, Missouri, United States
,
Shawn D. St Peter
1   Department of Surgery, Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, Missouri, United States
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

23 May 2014

26 October 2014

Publication Date:
02 February 2015 (online)

Abstract

Introduction We conducted a prospective randomized trial to evaluate the merits of two established postoperative pain management strategies: thoracic epidural (EPI) versus patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with intravenous narcotics after minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum. Pain scores favored the EPI group for the first two postoperative days only. Critics of the trial suggest that if the epidural failure rate was not so high, results may have favored the EPI group. Therefore, we performed a subset analysis of the EPI group to evaluate the impact of these failures.

Methods Patients for whom epidural catheter could not be placed or whose catheters were removed early owing to dysfunction were compared with those with well-functioning catheters. Those with well-functioning catheters were also compared with the PCA group. A two-tailed independent Student t-test and a two-tailed Fisher exact test were used where appropriate.

Results Of 55 patients in the EPI group, 12 patients (21.8%) had failed placement or required early removal. Comparing those with failed placements with the rest of the group, there was no difference in daily visual analogue scale pain scores or measures of hospital course. Likewise, comparing those with well-functioning catheters only to those in the PCA group, the results of the trial are replicated in terms of pain scores, hospital course, and length of stay.

Conclusion In patients with failed epidural therapy, there is no significant difference in postoperative hospital course. Comparing those with well-functioning catheters to those in the PCA group, trial results are replicated—that is, no significant difference in length of stay, time to regular diet, or time to transition to oral medications. Therefore, failure rate in the EPI group did not influence the results of the trial.

 
  • References

  • 1 Nuss D, Kelly RE. Congenital chest wall deformities. In: Holcomb III GW, Ashcraft KW, Murphy JP. Ashcraft's Pediatric Surgery. 5th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders Elsevier; 2010: 245-263
  • 2 Weber T, Mätzl J, Rokitansky A, Klimscha W, Neumann K, Deusch E ; Medical Research Society. Superior postoperative pain relief with thoracic epidural analgesia versus intravenous patient-controlled analgesia after minimally invasive pectus excavatum repair. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007; 134 (4) 865-870
  • 3 McBride WJ, Dicker R, Abajian JC, Vane DW. Continuous thoracic epidural infusions for postoperative analgesia after pectus deformity repair. J Pediatr Surg 1996; 31 (1) 105-107 , discussion 107–108
  • 4 Cánovas Martínez L, Domínguez García M, Fernández Gil N, Montes Deza A, López Alonso D, Castro Méndez A. Thoracic epidural analgesia in the postoperative period of pediatric surgery for the repair of pectus excavatum and pectus carinatum [in Spanish]. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim 1998; 45 (4) 148-152
  • 5 Soliman IE, Apuya JS, Fertal KM, Simpson PM, Tobias JD. Intravenous versus epidural analgesia after surgical repair of pectus excavatum. Am J Ther 2009; 16 (5) 398-403
  • 6 Futagawa K, Suwa I, Okuda T , et al. Anesthetic management for the minimally invasive Nuss procedure in 21 patients with pectus excavatum. J Anesth 2006; 20 (1) 48-50
  • 7 St Peter SD, Weesner KA, Weissend EE , et al. Epidural vs patient-controlled analgesia for postoperative pain after pectus excavatum repair: a prospective, randomized trial. J Pediatr Surg 2012; 47 (1) 148-153
  • 8 Densmore JC, Peterson DB, Stahovic LL , et al. Initial surgical and pain management outcomes after Nuss procedure. J Pediatr Surg 2010; 45 (9) 1767-1771
  • 9 Grosen K, Pfeiffer-Jensen M, Pilegaard HK. Postoperative consumption of opioid analgesics following correction of pectus excavatum is influenced by pectus severity: a single-centre study of 236 patients undergoing minimally invasive correction of pectus excavatum. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2010; 37 (4) 833-839
  • 10 St Peter SD, Sharp SW, Ostlie DJ, Snyder CL, Holcomb III GW, Sharp RJ. Use of a subxiphoid incision for pectus bar placement in the repair of pectus excavatum. J Pediatr Surg 2010; 45 (6) 1361-1364
  • 11 Butkovic D, Kralik S, Matolic M, Kralik M, Toljan S, Radesic L. Postoperative analgesia with intravenous fentanyl PCA vs epidural block after thoracoscopic pectus excavatum repair in children. Br J Anaesth 2007; 98 (5) 677-681