J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2015; 76(03): 189-194
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1396599
Original Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Techniques for Preservation of the Frontotemporal Branch of Facial Nerve during Orbitozygomatic Approaches

Toma Spiriev
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Rigshospitalet-Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
,
Lars Poulsgaard
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Rigshospitalet-Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
,
Kaare Fugleholm
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Rigshospitalet-Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

06 April 2014

16 September 2014

Publication Date:
24 December 2014 (online)

Abstract

Background During orbitozygomatic (OZ) approaches, the frontotemporal branch (FTB) of the facial nerve is exposed to injury if proper measures are not taken. This article describes in detail the nuances of the two most common techniques (interfascial and subfascial dissection).

Design The FTB of the facial nerve was dissected and followed in its tissue planes on fresh-frozen cadaver heads. The interfascial and subfascial dissections were performed, and every step was photographed and examined.

Results The interfascial dissection is safe to be started from the most anterior part of the superior temporal line and followed to the root of the zygoma. The dissection is continued on the deep temporalis fascia (DTF), and the interfascial fat pad is elevated. With the subfascial dissection, both the superficial temporalis fascia and the DTF are elevated. The interfascial dissection exposes the zygomatic arch directly, whereas the subfascial dissection requires an additional cut on the DTF to expose the zygomatic arch. Proper subperiosteal dissection on the zygomatic arch is another important step in FTB preservation.

Conclusion Detailed understanding of the complex relationship of the tissue planes in the frontotemporal region is needed to perform OZ exposures safely.

Notes

We presented this work as an e-poster at the World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies (WFNS) meeting, Seoul, South Korea, September 8–13, 2013.


 
  • References

  • 1 al-Mefty O, Anand VK. Zygomatic approach to skull-base lesions. J Neurosurg 1990; 73 (5) 668-673
  • 2 Aziz KM, Froelich SC, Cohen PL, Sanan A, Keller JT, van Loveren HR. The one-piece orbitozygomatic approach: the MacCarty burr hole and the inferior orbital fissure as keys to technique and application. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2002; 144 (1) 15-24
  • 3 Cheng CM, Chang CF, Ma HI, Chiang YH, McMenomey SO, Delashaw Jr JB. Modified orbitozygomatic craniotomy for large medial sphenoid wing meningiomas. J Clin Neurosci 2009; 16 (9) 1157-1160
  • 4 Deshmukh VR, Albuquerque FC, Zabramski JM, Spetzler RF. Surgical management of cavernous malformations involving the cranial nerves. Neurosurgery 2003; 53 (2) 352-357 ; discussion 357
  • 5 Golshani KJ, Lalwani K, Delashaw JB, Selden NR. Modified orbitozygomatic craniotomy for craniopharyngioma resection in children. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2009; 4 (4) 345-352
  • 6 Gonzalez LF, Crawford NR, Horgan MA, Deshmukh P, Zabramski JM, Spetzler RF. Working area and angle of attack in three cranial base approaches: pterional, orbitozygomatic, and maxillary extension of the orbitozygomatic approach. Neurosurgery 2002; 50 (3) 550-555 ; discussion 555–557
  • 7 Liu JK, Fukushima T, Sameshima T, Al-Mefty O, Couldwell WT. Increasing exposure of the petrous internal carotid artery for revascularization using the transzygomatic extended middle fossa approach: a cadaveric morphometric study. Neurosurgery 2006; 59 (4) (Suppl. 02) ONS309-ONS318 ; discussion ONS318–ONS319
  • 8 Sindou M, Emery E, Acevedo G, Ben-David U. Respective indications for orbital rim, zygomatic arch and orbito-zygomatic osteotomies in the surgical approach to central skull base lesions. Critical, retrospective review in 146 cases. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2001; 143 (10) 967-975
  • 9 Shimizu S, Tanriover N, Rhoton Jr AL, Yoshioka N, Fujii K. MacCarty keyhole and inferior orbital fissure in orbitozygomatic craniotomy. Neurosurgery 2005; 57 (1, Suppl): 152-159 ; discussion 152–159
  • 10 Zabramski JM, Kiriş T, Sankhla SK, Cabiol J, Spetzler RF. Orbitozygomatic craniotomy. Technical note. J Neurosurg 1998; 89 (2) 336-341
  • 11 Ammirati M, Spallone A, Ma J, Cheatham M, Becker D. An anatomicosurgical study of the temporal branch of the facial nerve. Neurosurgery 1993; 33 (6) 1038-1043 ; discussion 1044
  • 12 Ammirati M, Spallone A, Ma J, Cheatham M, Becker D. Preservation of the temporal branch of the facial nerve in pterional-transzygomatic craniotomy. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1994; 128 (1–4) 163-165
  • 13 Aoki N. Incision of facial nerve branch at aneurysm surgery [letter]. J Neurosurg 1987; 66 (3) 482
  • 14 Coscarella E, Vishteh AG, Spetzler RF, Seoane E, Zabramski JM. Subfascial and submuscular methods of temporal muscle dissection and their relationship to the frontal branch of the facial nerve. Technical note. J Neurosurg 2000; 92 (5) 877-880
  • 15 Salas E, Ziyal IM, Bejjani GK, Sekhar LN. Anatomy of the frontotemporal branch of the facial nerve and indications for interfascial dissection. Neurosurgery 1998; 43 (3) 563-568 ; discussion 568–569
  • 16 Yaşargil MG, Reichman MV, Kubik S. Preservation of the frontotemporal branch of the facial nerve using the interfascial temporalis flap for pterional craniotomy. Technical article. J Neurosurg 1987; 67 (3) 463-466
  • 17 Moss CJ, Mendelson BC, Taylor GI. Surgical anatomy of the ligamentous attachments in the temple and periorbital regions. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 105 (4) 1475-1490 ; discussion 1491–1498
  • 18 Davidge KM, van Furth WR, Agur A, Cusimano M. Naming the soft tissue layers of the temporoparietal region: unifying anatomic terminology across surgical disciplines. Neurosurgery 2010; 67 (3, Suppl Operative): ons120-ons129 ; discussion ons129–ons130
  • 19 Krayenbühl N, Isolan GR, Hafez A, Yaşargil MG. The relationship of the fronto-temporal branches of the facial nerve to the fascias of the temporal region: a literature review applied to practical anatomical dissection. Neurosurg Rev 2007; 30 (1) 8-15 ; discussion 15
  • 20 Lei T, Xu DC, Gao JH , et al. Using the frontal branch of the superficial temporal artery as a landmark for locating the course of the temporal branch of the facial nerve during rhytidectomy: an anatomical study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 116 (2) 623-629 ; discussion 630
  • 21 Abul-Hassan HS, von Drasek Ascher G, Acland RD. Surgical anatomy and blood supply of the fascial layers of the temporal region. Plast Reconstr Surg 1986; 77 (1) 17-28
  • 22 Campiglio GL, Candiani P. Anatomical study on the temporal fascial layers and their relationships with the facial nerve. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1997; 21 (2) 69-74
  • 23 Sabini P, Wayne I, Quatela VC. Anatomical guides to precisely localize the frontal branch of the facial nerve. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2003; 5 (2) 150-152
  • 24 Stuzin JM, Wagstrom L, Kawamoto HK, Wolfe SA. Anatomy of the frontal branch of the facial nerve: the significance of the temporal fat pad. Plast Reconstr Surg 1989; 83 (2) 265-271
  • 25 Gosain AK, Sewall SR, Yousif NJ. The temporal branch of the facial nerve: how reliably can we predict its path?. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997; 99 (5) 1224-1233 ; discussion 1234–1236
  • 26 Hwang K, Suh MS, Lee SI, Chung IH. Zygomaticotemporal nerve passage in the orbit and temporal area. J Craniofac Surg 2004; 15 (2) 209-214