PDF herunterladen
Informationen aus Orthodontie & Kieferorthopädie 2015; 47(01): 61-64
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1548756
Leser fragen – Experten antworten
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Wie zuverlässig werden der vestibuläre und der orale Alveolarfortsatz im Volumentomogramm dargestellt?

How Reliable is CBCT in Depicting the Buccal and Lingual Alveolar Bone?
D. J. Halazonetis
1   Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
18. Mai 2015 (online)

Auch verfügbar auf
    Lizenzen und Reprints

Frage

Wie zuverlässig werden der vestibuläre und der orale Alveolarfortsatz im Volumentomogramm dargestellt?

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Halazonetis DJ. Cone-beam computed tomography is not the imaging technique of choice for comprehensive orthodontic assessment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2012; 141: 403 405, 407
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 SEDENTEXCT project. Radiation protection: cone beam CT for dental and maxillofacial radiology. Evidence based guidelines 2011 Verfügbar unter http://www.sedentexct.eu/files/guidelines_final.pdf Aufgerufen am 3. Nov. 2014
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology . Clinical recommendations regarding use of cone beam computed tomography in orthodontics. Position statement by the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2013; 116: 238-257
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Patcas R, Müller L, Ullrich O et al. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography at different resolutions assessed on the bony covering of the mandibular anterior teeth. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2012; 141: 41-50
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Schulze R, Heil U, Groß D et al. Artefacts in CBCT: a review. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2011; 40: 265-273
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Molen AD. Considerations in the use of cone-beam computed tomography for buccal bone measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010; 137 (4 Suppl): S130-S135
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Spin-Neto R, Gotfredsen E, Wenzel A. Impact of voxel size variation on CBCT-based diagnostic outcome in dentistry: a systematic review. J Digit Imaging 2013; 26: 813-820
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Wood R, Sun Z, Chaudhry J et al. Factors affecting the accuracy of buccal alveolar bone height measurements from cone-beam computed tomography images. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013; 143: 353-363
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Bryant JA, Drage NA, Richmond S. Study of the scan uniformity from an i-CAT cone beam computed tomography dental imaging system. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2008; 37: 365-374
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Katsumata A, Hirukawa A, Okumura S et al. Effects of image artifacts on gray-value density in limited-volume cone-beam computerized tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007; 104: 829-836
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Ballrick JW, Palomo JM, Ruch E et al. Image distortion and spatial resolution of a commercially available cone-beam computed tomography machine. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008; 134: 573-582
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Watanabe H, Honda E, Tetsumura A et al. A comparative study for spatial resolution and subjective image characteristics of a multi-slice CT and a cone-beam CT for dental use. Eur J Radiol 2011; 77: 397-402
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Pauwels R, Beinsberger J, Stamatakis H et al. SEDENTEXCT Project Consortium. Comparison of spatial and contrast resolution for cone-beam computed tomography scanners. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2012; 114: 127-135
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Bamba J, Araki K, Endo A et al. Image quality assessment of three cone beam CT machines using the SEDENTEXCT CT phantom. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2013; 42: 20120445
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Leung CC, Palomo L, Griffith R et al. Accuracy and reliability of cone-beam computed tomography for measuring alveolar bone height and detecting bony dehiscences and fenestrations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010; 137 (4 Suppl): S109-S119
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Timock AM, Cook V, McDonald T et al. Accuracy and reliability of buccal bone height and thickness measurements from cone-beam computed tomography imaging. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011; 140: 734-744
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1: 307-310
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Larato DC. Alveolar plate fenestrations and dehiscences of the human skull. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1970; 29: 816-819
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Davies RM, Downer MC, Hull PS et al. Alveolar defects in human skulls. J Clin Periodontol 1974; 1: 107-111
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Rupprecht RD, Horning GM, Nicoll BK et al. Prevalence of dehiscences and fenestrations in modern American skulls. J Periodontol 2001; 72: 722-729
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Nimigean VR, Nimigean V, Bencze MA et al. Alveolar bone dehiscences and fenestrations: an anatomical study and review. Rom J Morphol Embryol 2009; 50: 391-397
    PubMedGoogle Scholar