Download PDF
Int J Sports Med 2015; 36(13): 1100-1105
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1548888
Orthopedics & Biomechanics
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Effect on Oxygen Cost of Transport from 8-Weeks of Progressive Training with Barefoot Running

N. Tam
1   UCT/MRC Research Unit for Exercise Science and Sports Medicine, Department of Human Biology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
,
R. Tucker
1   UCT/MRC Research Unit for Exercise Science and Sports Medicine, Department of Human Biology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
,
J. L. Astephen Wilson
2   School of Biomedical Engineering, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada
,
J. Santos-Concejero
1   UCT/MRC Research Unit for Exercise Science and Sports Medicine, Department of Human Biology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History



accepted after revision 10 March 2015

Publication Date:
02 September 2015 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Popular interest in barefoot running has emerged as a result of its alleged performance and injury prevention benefits. Oxygen cost of transport (COT) improvements from barefoot running, however, remains equivocal. The aim of this study was to determine the influence of an 8-week progressive barefoot training program on COT and associated spatiotemporal variables. 15 male runners participated in this study. Variables such as oxygen uptake, biomechanical and spatiotemporal characteristics of gait, including ground contact (GC) and swing time; stride length and frequency and ankle plantar-dorsiflexion were measured pre- and post-intervention. The COT did not differ between barefoot and shod running either pre- or post-training. Improved barefoot COT (p<0.05) but not shod was found between pre- and post-training. Biomechanical differences between barefoot and shod conditions persisted over the training period. A decrease in barefoot COT was associated with a decrease in GC time (p=0.003, r=0.688) and a small increase in stride frequency (p=0.030; r=0.569). Ground contact time and stride frequency, previously associated with COT, only partly contribute (32% – Stride frequency and 47% – GC time) to a decrease in COT after barefoot training. Thus other physiological and biomechanical variables must influence the improvement in COT after a barefoot training intervention.

Key words

running economy - performance - exercise - sports

Supplementary Material

 

  • References

  • 1 Beattie K, Kenny IC, Lyons M, Carson BP. The effect of strength training on performance in endurance athletes. Sports Med 2014; 44: 845-865
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Cavanagh PR, Williams KR. The effect of stride length variation on oxygen uptake during distance running. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1982; 14: 30-35
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Cheung RTH, Rainbow MJ. Landing pattern and vertical loading rates during first attempt of barefoot running in habitual shod runners. Hum Mov Sci 2014; 34: 120-127
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Divert C, Baur H, Mornieux G, Mayer F, Belli A. Stiffness adaptations in shod running. J Appl Biomech 2005; 21: 311-321
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Divert C, Mornieux G, Freychat P, Baly L, Mayer F, Belli A. Barefoot-shod running differences: shoe or mass effect?. Int J Sports Med 2008; 29: 512-518
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Dumke CL, Pfaffenroth CM, McBride JM, McCauley GO. Relationship between muscle strength, power and stiffness and running economy in trained male runners. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 2010; 5: 249-261
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Franch J, Madsen K, Djurhuus MS, Pedersen PK. Improved running economy following intensified training correlates with reduced ventilatory demands. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1998; 30: 1250-1256
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Franz JR, Wierzbinski CM, Kram R. Metabolic cost of running barefoot versus shod: is lighter better?. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2012; 44: 1519-1525
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Gruber AH, Umberger BR, Braun B, Hamill J. Economy and rate of carbohydrate oxidation during running with rearfoot and forefoot strike patterns. J Appl Physiol 2013; 115: 194-201
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Hanson NJ, Berg K, Deka P, Meendering JR, Ryan C. Oxygen Cost of Running Barefoot vs. Running Shod. Int J Sports Med 2011; 32: 401-406
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Harriss DJ, Atkinson G. Ethical standards in sport and exercise science research: 2014 update. Int J Sports Med 2013; 34: 1025-1028
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Hopkins WG, Marshall SW, Batterham AM, Hanin J. Progressive statistics for studies in sports medicine and exercise science. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2009; 41: 3-13
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Jones AM, Grassi B, Christensen PM, Krustrup P, Bangsbo J, Poole DC. Slow component of VO2 kinetics: mechanistic bases and practical applications. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2011; 43: 2046-2062
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Kram R, Franz JR. Is barefoot running more economical?. Int J Sports Med 2012; 33: 249 author reply 250
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Lieberman DE, Venkadesan M, Werbel Wa, Daoud AI, D’Andrea S, Davis IS, Mang’eni RO, Pitsiladis Y. Foot strike patterns and collision forces in habitually barefoot versus shod runners. Nature 2010; 463: 531-535
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Lieberman DE. What we can learn about running from barefoot running: an evolutionary medical perspective. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 2012; 40: 63-72
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Di Michele R, Merni F. The concurrent effects of strike pattern and ground-contact time on running economy. J Sci Med Sport 2014; 17: 414-418
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Nummela A, Keränen T, Mikkelsson LO. Factors related to top running speed and economy. Int J Sports Med 2007; 28: 655-661
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Nummela AT, Heath Ka, Paavolainen LM, Lambert MI, St Clair Gibson A, Rusko HK, Noakes TD. Fatigue during a 5-km running time trial. Int J Sports Med 2008; 29: 738-745
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Ogueta-Alday A, Rodríguez-Marroyo JA, García-López J. Rearfoot striking runners are more economical than midfoot strikers. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2014; 46: 580-585
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Perl DP, Daoud AI, Lieberman DE. Effects of footwear and strike type on running economy. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2012; 44: 1335-1343
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Richards CE, Magin PJ, Callister R. Is your prescription of distance running shoes evidence-based?. Br J Sports Med 2009; 43: 159-162
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Robbins SE, Hanna AM. Running-related injury prevention through barefoot adaptations. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1987; 19: 148-156
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Santos-Concejero J, Tam N, Granados C, Irazusta J, Bidaurrazaga-Letona I, Zabala-Lili J, Gil SM. Interaction effects of stride angle and strike pattern on running economy. Int J Sports Med 2014; 35: 1118-1123
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Santos-Concejero J, Tam N, Granados C, Irazusta J, Bidaurrazaga-Letona I, Zabala-Lili J, Gil SM. Stride angle as a novel indicator of running economy in well-trained runners. J Strength Cond Res 2014; 28: 1889-1895
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Saunders PU, Pyne DB, Telford RD, Hawley JA. Factors affecting running economy in trained distance runners. Sports Med 2004; 34: 465-485
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Squadrone R, Gallozzi C. Biomechanical and physiological comparison of barefoot and two shod conditions in experienced barefoot runners. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 2009; 49: 6-13
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Tam N, Astephen Wilson JL, Noakes TD, Tucker R. Barefoot running: an evaluation of current hypothesis, future research and clinical applications. Br J Sports Med 2014; 48: 349-355
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Warne JP, Kilduff SM, Gregan BC, Nevill AM, Moran KA, Warrington GD. A 4-week instructed minimalist running transition and gait-retraining changes plantar pressure and force. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2013; 1-10
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Warne JP, Warrington GD. Four-week habituation to simulated barefoot running improves running economy when compared with shod running. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2014; 24: 563-568
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Williams KR, Cavanagh PR. Relationship between distance running mechanics, running economy, and performance. J Appl Physiol 1987; 63: 1236-1245
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Willy RW, Davis IS. Kinematic and kinetic comparison of running in standard and minimalist shoes. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2014; 46: 318-323
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar