Our Experience in Transcrotal Orchidopexy in Children Affected by Palpable Undescended Testis

Abstract

Introduction Classically, surgical approach for palpable undescended testis (pUDT) consists is an inguinal orchidopexy. In fact, a double incision allows an adequate mobilization of the spermatic cord and an easy dissection of a patent processus vaginalis and also to perform a subdartos pouch. For reduce potential mobility of the inguinal approach, in 1989 Bianchi and Squire proposed a transcrotal orchidopexy, using a high scrotal incision. We report our experiences and retrospectively evaluate the feasibility and postoperative success of the transcrotal approach for treatment of pUDT.

Patients and Methods From January 2012 to June 2014, 217 patients, affected by pUDT were treated at our Institution, for a total of 231 orchidopexies (203 monolateral pUDT, 14 bilateral pUDT). Patients, in whom, under anesthesia, the testis could be moved to the neck of the scrotum, have been treated with a transcrotal approach using a high scrotal incision. All patients have been clinically followed up at 1 week and at 1, 2, 3, and 6 months, at 1 year, and then annually and using scrotal sonography with color-Doppler at 2, 3, and 6 months.

Results A total of 205 pUDT (88.7%) were considered eligible for transcrotal. Eight (3.9%) pUDT, that were first approached transcrotally, have been converted to inguinal approach. At follow-up, two moderate scrotal hematomas and one inguinal hernia were noted. No recurrence or testicular atrophy was showed in transcrotal approached testes, while 2 recurrences out of 26 procedures (7.7%) were displayed after inguinal orchidopexy.

Conclusions In our experience, transcrotal approach is possible in almost 90% of pUDT. No major complication, such as recurrence or testicular atrophy, has been complained. Just 3 out of the 205 cases (1.5%) reported minor complications and 1 of which required a successful day-case procedure. Our data confirm that transcrotal orchidopexy can be considered effective, safe, and with a success rate being equivalent or better to classical inguinal approach.

Keywords

undescended testis - orchidopexy - transcrotal orchidopexy

• References

• 1 Hutson JM. Orchidopexy. In: Spitz L, Coran AG, eds. Operative Pediatric Surgery. London, United Kingdom: Hodder Arnold; 2006: 861-869
• 2 Caruso AP, Walsh RA, Wolach JW, Koyle MA. Single scrotal incision orchiopexy for the palpable undescended testicle. J Urol 2000; 164 (1) 156-158 , discussion 158–159
• 3 Kanemoto K, Hayashi Y, Kojima Y, Tozawa K, Mogami T, Kohri K. The management of nonpalpable testis with combined groin exploration and subsequent transinguinal laparoscopy. J Urol 2002; 167 (2 Pt 1) 674-676
• 4 Bassel YS, Scherz HC, Kirsch AJ. Scrotal incision orchiopexy for undescended testes with or without a patent processus vaginalis. J Urol 2007; 177 (4) 1516-1518
• 5 Huston JM. Orchidopexy. In: Puri P, Höllwarth ME, eds. Pediatric Surgery. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag; 2006: 555-568
• 6 Virtanen HE, Toppari J. Epidemiology and pathogenesis of cryptorchidism. Hum Reprod Update 2008; 14 (1) 49-58
• 7 Johnson WW. Cryptorchidism. JAMA 1939; 113: 25-27
• 8 Job JC, Toublanc JE, Chaussain JL, Gendrel D, Roger M, Canlorbe P. The pituitary-gonadal axis in cryptorchid infants and children. Eur J Pediatr 1987; 146 (Suppl. 02) S2-S5
• 9 Hadziselimović F, Thommen L, Girard J, Herzog B. The significance of postnatal gonadotropin surge for testicular development in normal and cryptorchid testes. J Urol 1986; 136 (1 Pt 2) 274-276
• 10 Kolon TF, Herndon CDA, Baker LA , et al; American Urological Assocation. Evaluation and treatment of cryptorchidism: AUA guideline. J Urol 2014; 192 (2) 337-345
• 11 Wood HM, Elder JS. Cryptorchidism and testicular cancer: separating fact from fiction. J Urol 2009; 181 (2) 452-461
• 12 Park K, Choi H. An evolution of orchiopexy: historical aspect. Korean J Urol 2010; 51 (3) 155-160
• 13 Bianchi A, Squire BR. Transscrotal orchidopexy: orchidopexy revised. Pediatr Surg Int 1989; 4: 189-192
• 14 Gordon M, Cervellione RM, Morabito A, Bianchi A. 20 years of transcrotal orchidopexy for undescended testis: results and outcomes. J Pediatr Urol 2010; 6 (5) 506-512
• 15 Satava RM. Identification and reduction of surgical error using simulation. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 2005; 14 (4) 257-261
• 16 Dindo D, Clavien PA. What is a surgical complication?. World J Surg 2008; 32 (6) 939-941
• 17 Carson JS, Cusick R, Mercer A , et al. Undescended testes: does age at orchiopexy affect survival of the testis?. J Pediatr Surg 2014; 49 (5) 770-773
• 18 Al-Mandil M, Khoury AE, El-Hout Y, Kogon M, Dave S, Farhat WA. Potential complications with the prescrotal approach for the palpable undescended testis? A comparison of single prescrotal incision to the traditional inguinal approach. J Urol 2008; 180 (2) 686-689
• 19 Rajimwale A, Brant WO, Koyle MA. High scrotal (Bianchi) single-incision orchidopexy: a “tailored” approach to the palpable undescended testis. Pediatr Surg Int 2004; 20 (8) 618-622
• 20 Callewaert PRH, Rahnama'i MS, Biallosterski BT, van Kerrebroeck PE. Scrotal approach to both palpable and impalpable undescended testes: should it become our first choice?. Urology 2010; 76 (1) 73-76
• 21 Ceccanti S, Zani A, Mele E, Cozzi DA. Orchidopexy without ligation of the processus vaginalis is not associated with an increased risk of inguinal hernia. Hernia 2014; 18 (3) 339-342
• 22 Iyer KR, Kumar V, Huddart SN, Bianchi A. The scrotal approach. Pediatr Surg Int 1995; 10: 58-60
• 23 Handa R, Kale R, Harjai M, Minocha A. Single scrotal incision orchiopexy for palpable undescended testis. Asian J Surg 2006; 29 (1) 25-27
• 24 Novaes HF, Carneiro Neto JA, Macedo Jr A, Barroso Júnior U. Single scrotal incision orchiopexy - a systematic review. Int Braz J Urol 2013; 39 (3) 305-311
• 25 Russinko PJ, Siddiq FM, Tackett LD, Caldamone AA. Prescrotal orchiopexy: an alternative surgical approach for the palpable undescended testis. J Urol 2003; 170 (6 Pt 1) 2436-2438
• 26 Docimo SG. The results of surgical therapy for cryptorchidism: a literature review and analysis. J Urol 1995; 154 (3) 1148-1152
• 27 McIntosh LA, Scrimgeour D, Youngson GG, Driver CP. The risk of failure after primary orchidopexy: an 18 year review. J Pediatr Urol 2013; 9 (6 Pt A): 759-762
• 28 Surana R, Puri P. Iatrogenic ascent of the testis: an under-recognized complication of inguinal hernia operation in children. Br J Urol 1994; 73 (5) 580-581
• 29 Ein SH, Nasr A, Wales PW, Ein A. Testicular atrophy after attempted pediatric orchidopexy for true undescended testis. J Pediatr Surg 2014; 49 (2) 317-322