Semin intervent Radiol 2015; 32(04): 428-438
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1564708
How I Do It
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Planning Arteriography for Yttrium-90 Microsphere Radioembolization

Ron C. Gaba
1   Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Illinois Hospital and Health Sciences System, Chicago, Illinois
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
10. November 2015 (online)

Yttrium-90 radioembolization (90Y RE) is a contemporary transcatheter locoregional therapy for primary and secondary hepatic malignancies that is commonly utilized in modern Interventional Radiology (IR) practice.[1] Unlike other targeted endovascular therapies, such as transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and transarterial embolization (TAE), the current standard of care protocol for 90Y RE treatment of liver tumors involves a two-stage treatment process consisting of a planning arteriography procedure followed by the therapeutic 90Y RE, typically performed 1 to 2 weeks later. The diagnostic planning procedure has threefold intent: (1) to delineate hepatic and tumor vascular anatomy relevant to 90Y microsphere dosimetry and administration; (2) to identify and possibly embolize extrahepatic vessels at risk for nontarget microsphere deposition; and (3) to quantify the degree of hepatopulmonary shunting using technetium-99m macroaggregated albumin (99mTc-MAA) scanning.[2] Given the multifactorial basis for performance of mapping arteriography, and despite some literature guidelines outlining procedure methodology,[3] [4] this procedure is often technically challenging, labor intensive, and time consuming. This article aims to present a simple overview of a single operator's technical approach to planning arteriography performed prior to 90Y RE—including tips, tricks, and pitfalls—based on experience gained in having performed hundreds of hepatic arteriography procedures. Technical details of 90Y RE dosimetry and microsphere administration are beyond the scope of the current topic, and will not be discussed.

 
  • References

  • 1 Garrean S, Joseph Espat N. Yttrium-90 internal radiation therapy for hepatic malignancy. Surg Oncol 2005; 14 (4) 179-193
  • 2 Salem R, Lewandowski RJ, Sato KT , et al. Technical aspects of radioembolization with 90Y microspheres. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 2007; 10 (1) 12-29
  • 3 Kennedy A, Nag S, Salem R , et al. Recommendations for radioembolization of hepatic malignancies using yttrium-90 microsphere brachytherapy: a consensus panel report from the radioembolization brachytherapy oncology consortium. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2007; 68 (1) 13-23
  • 4 Liu DM, Salem R, Bui JT , et al. Angiographic considerations in patients undergoing liver-directed therapy. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2005; 16 (7) 911-935
  • 5 Salem R, Thurston KG. Radioembolization with 90Yttrium microspheres: a state-of-the-art brachytherapy treatment for primary and secondary liver malignancies. Part 1: Technical and methodologic considerations. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2006; 17 (8) 1251-1278
  • 6 Fischman AM, Resnick NJ, Fung JW , et al. Transradial approach for hepatic arterial embolization: initial results and technique. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2013; 24: S93-S4
  • 7 Ray Jr CE, Gaba RC, Knuttinen MG, Minocha J, Bui JT. Multiple arteries supplying a single tumor vascular distribution: microsphere administration options for the interventional radiologist performing radioembolization. Semin Intervent Radiol 2014; 31 (2) 203-206
  • 8 Gaba RC, Vanmiddlesworth KA. Chemoembolic hepatopulmonary shunt reduction to allow safe yttrium-90 radioembolization lobectomy of hepatocellular carcinoma. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2012; 35 (6) 1505-1511
  • 9 Hamoui N, Minocha J, Memon K , et al. Prophylactic embolization of the gastroduodenal and right gastric arteries is not routinely necessary before radioembolization with glass microspheres. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2013; 24 (11) 1743-1745
  • 10 Lam MG, Banerjee S, Louie JD , et al. Root cause analysis of gastroduodenal ulceration after yttrium-90 radioembolization. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2013; 36 (6) 1536-1547
  • 11 McWilliams JP, Kee ST, Loh CT, Lee EW, Liu DM. Prophylactic embolization of the cystic artery before radioembolization: feasibility, safety, and outcomes. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2011; 34 (4) 786-792
  • 12 Atassi B, Bangash AK, Lewandowski RJ , et al. Biliary sequelae following radioembolization with Yttrium-90 microspheres. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2008; 19 (5) 691-697
  • 13 Bilbao JI, Garrastachu P, Herráiz MJ , et al. Safety and efficacy assessment of flow redistribution by occlusion of intrahepatic vessels prior to radioembolization in the treatment of liver tumors. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2010; 33 (3) 523-531
  • 14 Spreafico C, Morosi C, Maccauro M , et al. Intrahepatic flow redistribution in patients treated with radioembolization. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2015; 38 (2) 322-328
  • 15 Morante A, Romano M, Cuomo A , et al. Massive gastric ulceration after transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 63 (4) 718-720
  • 16 Gates VL, Marshall KG, Salzig K, Williams M, Lewandowski RJ, Salem R. Outpatient single-session yttrium-90 glass microsphere radioembolization. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2014; 25 (2) 266-270
  • 17 Liu D, Cade DN, Worsley D, Klass D, Lim H, Arepally A. Single procedure Yttrium-90 (SPY90): pilot study of a consolidated single procedure selective internal radiation therapy without prior-MAA nuclear medicine scan or prophylactic embolization utilizing Yttrium-90 resin microspheres. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2013; 36: S321