The Role of Auricular Prostheses (Epitheses) in Ear Reconstruction

Abstract

The artwork of making the epithesis by the dedicated anaplastologist is the prerequisite of acceptance by the patient and the key for success of this approach. However, computer science is helping with virtual planning and rapid prototyping, and it is likely to revolutionize this process in the near future. One of the advantages of the auricular prostheses is that it can be manufactured as a mirrored replica of the opposite side (if normal or near normal). Furthermore, the results are predictable, and may be shown to the patient before surgery. The developments of various implant systems allow secure retention even in unfavorable anatomic situations as in the ideally pneumatized mastoid process. The advantage of the plate systems is that they spread the loading forces to multiple smaller bone screws, rendering it thereby resistant to torque with abutment insertion or magnet change. Auricular prostheses fulfill three roles: (1) temporary measure, (2) rescue procedure in failed auricular (re)construction, and (3) definitive treatment option. Conventional retention by medical adhesives, sometimes helped by making use of the remnant, keeps its place in the use as a temporary measure or if the patient declines surgery. Today, implant-retained auricular prostheses made of silicone are state of the art for prosthetic rehabilitation of patients with auricular defects.

Keywords

epithesis - auricular prosthesis - osseointegrated implant - bone anchorage

• References

• 1 Federspil PA. Implant-retained craniofacial prostheses for facial defects. GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2009; 8: Doc03
• 2 Federspil PA. Ear epitheses as an alternative to autogenous reconstruction. Facial Plast Surg 2009; 25 (3) 190-203
• 3 Ariani N, Visser A, van Oort RP , et al. Current state of craniofacial prosthetic rehabilitation. Int J Prosthodont 2013; 26 (1) 57-67
• 4 Federspil PA. Auricular prostheses. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 2010; 68: 65-80
• 5 Brånemark PI, Hansson BO, Adell R , et al. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Suppl 1977; 16 (Suppl. 16) 1-132
• 6 Tjellström A, Lindström J, Hallén O, Albrektsson T, Brånemark PI. Osseointegrated titanium implants in the temporal bone. A clinical study on bone-anchored hearing aids. Am J Otol 1981; 2 (4) 304-310
• 7 Tjellström A, Lindström J, Nylén O , et al. The bone-anchored auricular episthesis. Laryngoscope 1981; 91 (5) 811-815
• 8 Miller KL, Faulkner G, Wolfaardt JF. Misfit and functional loading of craniofacial implants. Int J Prosthodont 2004; 17 (3) 267-273
• 9 Federspil PA, Federspil P, Schneider MH. Magnetverankerung in der Epithetik. In: Blankenstein F, ed., Magnete in der Zahnmedizin. Rottweil: Flohr Verlag; 2001: 104-109
• 10 Granström G. Craniofacial osseointegration. Oral Dis 2007; 13 (3) 261-269
• 11 Federspil PA, Plinkert PK. Bone anchored hearing aids always bilateral!. HNO 2002; 50 (5) 405-409
• 12 Hölzl M, Caffier P, Jungk J, Scherer H, Schrom T. The ti-epiplating system in bone anchored hearing aids. Laryngorhinootologie 2007; 86 (3) 193-199
• 13 Sandner A, Bloching M. Experiences with a new platelike implant system (TiEpiplating system) for rehabilitation of orbital and midfacial defects. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 2004; 221 (11) 978-984
• 14 Volkenstein S, Dazert S, Jahnke K, Schneider M, Neumann A. Prosthetic supply of tissue defects in head and neck surgery. Laryngorhinootologie 2007; 86 (12) 854-860
• 15 Brom J, Stöver T, Wagenblast J. Epithesial craniofacial reconstructions after mutilating surgery in head and neck cancer patients [in German]. Laryngorhinootologie 2013; 92 (1) 51-59 , quiz 60–61
• 16 Schneider M, Federspil PA, Neumann A, Schick B. A new implant system for orbital prosthetic rehabilitation: “epiplating mono” [in German]. Laryngorhinootologie 2014; 93 (6) 381-384
• 17 Federspil PA. Craniofacial prostheses for facial defects [in German]. HNO 2010; 58 (6) 621-631 , quiz 632
• 18 Granström G, Bergström K, Odersjö M, Tjellström A. Osseointegrated implants in children: experience from our first 100 patients. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2001; 125 (1) 85-92
• 19 Han K, Son D. Osseointegrated alloplastic ear reconstruction with the implant-carrying plate system in children. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 109 (2) 496-503 , discussion 504–505
• 20 Berghaus A. Implantate für die rekonstruktive Chirurgie der Nase und des Ohres. Laryngorhinootologie 2007; 86 (S1): 67-76
• 21 Siegert R, Magritz R. Die Rekonstruktion des äusseren Ohres. Laryngorhinootologie 2007; 86 (S1): 121-140
• 22 Staudenmaier R. Optimized auricular reconstruction with autologous cartilage: experience from 120 cases. HNO 2006; 54 (10) 749-755
• 23 Watson RM, Coward TJ, Forman GH. Results of treatment of 20 patients with implant-retained auricular prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995; 10 (4) 445-449
• 24 Tolman DE, Taylor PF. Bone-anchored craniofacial prosthesis study: irradiated patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996; 11 (5) 612-619
• 25 Parel SM, Tjellström A. The United States and Swedish experience with osseointegration and facial prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991; 6 (1) 75-79
• 26 Wolfaardt JF, Wilkes GH, Parel SM, Tjellström A. Craniofacial osseointegration: the Canadian experience. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993; 8 (2) 197-204
• 27 Junker OH. Epithetische Rehabilitation kraniofazialer Defekte. Eine Langzeituntersuchung über 12 Jahre bei 200 Patienten. In, Universitäts-HNO-Klinik. Homburg (Saar): Universität des Saarlandes; 2006
• 28 Farmand M. Die epithetische Rehablitation von Patienten mit Gesichtsdefekten mit dem Epitec-System - Grundlagen, Prinzipien, Resultate. In: Schwipper V, Tilkorn H, Sander U, ed., Fortschritte in der kraniofazialen chirurgischen Epithetik und Prothetik. Reinbek: Einhorn-Presse-Verlag; 1997: 78-88
• 29 Holgers KM, Roupe G, Tjellström A, Bjursten LM. Clinical, immunological and bacteriological evaluation of adverse reactions to skin-penetrating titanium implants in the head and neck region. Contact Dermat 1992; 27 (1) 1-7
• 30 Hultcrantz M. Outcome of the bone-anchored hearing aid procedure without skin thinning: a prospective clinical trial. Otol Neurotol 2011; 32 (7) 1134-1139