Facial Plast Surg 2016; 32(01): 088-094
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1570122
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Three-Dimensional Surface Imaging and the Continuous Evolution of Preoperative and Postoperative Assessment in Rhinoplasty

Garyfalia Lekakis
1   Department of ENT, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
,
Peter Claes
2   Department of Electrical Engineering, Medical Image Computing, Leuven, Belgium
,
Grant S. Hamilton III
3   Division of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
,
P. W. Hellings
1   Department of ENT, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
10. Februar 2016 (online)

Abstract

During the preoperative assessment in rhinoplasty, the surgeon takes a thorough history, performs a complete examination by assessing functional and aesthetic aspects of the nose, obtains a clear understanding of the patient's wishes, conducts facial analysis based on standardized photography, and communicates to the patient the goals and pitfalls of surgery. Computer imaging or morphing of the preoperative pictures of the nose has drawn a lot of interest in the last decade, and it is a sign of evolution of the preoperative consultation. Technological advances, also in the context of rhinoplasty, have led to the development of three-dimensional (3D) imaging techniques, and have completely revolutionized the way that surgeons manage their patients preoperatively and evaluate postoperative results today. The accurate 3D surface imaging aids the surgeon to communicate with the patient adequately before surgery, to set an appropriate surgical plan, and to measure the shape and volume changes of the patient's nose that result from the intervention. The present review provides an analysis on the current knowledge of 3D surface imaging in rhinoplasty derived from the literature, and highlights future directions of preoperative and postoperative assessment in the field.

 
  • References

  • 1 Werther JR, Freeman JP. Changes in nasal tip projection and rotation after septorhinoplasty: a cephalometric analysis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1998; 56 (6) 728-732 , discussion 733
  • 2 Byrd HS, Hobar PC. Rhinoplasty: a practical guide for surgical planning. Plast Reconstr Surg 1993; 91 (4) 642-654 , discussion 655–656
  • 3 Ingels K, Orhan KS. Measurement of preoperative and postoperative nasal tip projection and rotation. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2006; 8 (6) 411-415
  • 4 Nkenke E, Langer A, Laboureux X , et al. Validation of in vivo assessment of facial soft-tissue volume changes and clinical application in midfacial distraction: a technical report. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003; 112 (2) 367-380
  • 5 Henderson JL, Larrabee Jr WF, Krieger BD. Photographic standards for facial plastic surgery. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2005; 7 (5) 331-333
  • 6 Swamy RS, Sykes JM, Most SP. Principles of photography in rhinoplasty for the digital photographer. Clin Plast Surg 2010; 37 (2) 213-221
  • 7 Becker DG, Tardy Jr ME. Standardized photography in facial plastic surgery: pearls and pitfalls. Facial Plast Surg 1999; 15 (2) 93-99
  • 8 Shah AR, Dayan SH, Hamilton III GS. Pitfalls of photography for facial resurfacing and rejuvenation procedures. Facial Plast Surg 2005; 21 (2) 154-161
  • 9 Da Silveira AC, Daw Jr JL, Kusnoto B, Evans C, Cohen M. Craniofacial applications of three-dimensional laser surface scanning. J Craniofac Surg 2003; 14 (4) 449-456
  • 10 Alves PVM, Zhao L, Patel PK, Bolognese AM. Three-dimensional facial surface analysis of patients with skeletal malocclusion. J Craniofac Surg 2009; 20 (2) 290-296
  • 11 Honrado CP, Larrabee Jr WF. Update in three-dimensional imaging in facial plastic surgery. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004; 12 (4) 327-331
  • 12 Tzou C-HJ, Frey M. Evolution of 3D surface imaging systems in facial plastic surgery. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2011; 19 (4) 591-602 , vii
  • 13 Hajeer MY, Ayoub AF, Millett DT, Bock M, Siebert JP. Three-dimensional imaging in orthognathic surgery: the clinical application of a new method. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 2002; 17 (4) 318-330
  • 14 Hell B. 3D sonography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1995; 24 (1, Pt 2) 84-89
  • 15 Largo RD, Wettstein R, Fulco I , et al. Three-dimensional laser surface scanning in rhinosurgery. Facial Plast Surg 2013; 29 (2) 116-120
  • 16 Toriumi DM, Dixon TK. Assessment of rhinoplasty techniques by overlay of before-and-after 3D images. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2011; 19 (4) 711-723 , ix
  • 17 Yuen K, Kawakami S, Ogawara T, Inokuchi I, Maeta M, Masuda Y. Evaluation of facial palsy by Moiré topography. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1994; (Dec) S541-S544
  • 18 Kawai T, Natsume N, Shibata H, Yamamoto T. Three-dimensional analysis of facial morphology using moiré stripes. Part II. Analysis of normal adults. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1990; 19 (6) 359-362
  • 19 Tzou C-HJ, Artner NM, Pona I , et al. Comparison of three-dimensional surface-imaging systems. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2014; 67 (4) 489-497
  • 20 Beard LF, Burke PH. Evolution of a system of stereophotogrammetry for the study of facial morphology. Med Biol Illus 1967; 17 (1) 20-25
  • 21 Aldridge K, Boyadjiev SA, Capone GT, DeLeon VB, Richtsmeier JT. Precision and error of three-dimensional phenotypic measures acquired from 3dMD photogrammetric images. Am J Med Genet A 2005; 138A (3) 247-253
  • 22 Ayoub A, Garrahy A, Hood C , et al. Validation of a vision-based, three-dimensional facial imaging system. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2003; 40 (5) 523-529
  • 23 Weinberg SM, Scott NM, Neiswanger K, Brandon CA, Marazita ML. Digital three-dimensional photogrammetry: evaluation of anthropometric precision and accuracy using a Genex 3D camera system. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2004; 41 (5) 507-518
  • 24 Wong JY, Oh AK, Ohta E , et al. Validity and reliability of craniofacial anthropometric measurement of 3D digital photogrammetric images. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2008; 45 (3) 232-239
  • 25 Moscatiello F, Herrero Jover J, González Ballester MA, Carreño Hernández E, Piombino P, Califano L. Preoperative digital three-dimensional planning for rhinoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2010; 34 (2) 232-238
  • 26 Constantinides M. The rhinoplasty consultation and the business of rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2009; 17 (1) 1-5 , v
  • 27 Steiger JD. The rhinoplasty consult. Facial Plast Surg 2011; 27 (5) 393-396
  • 28 Gerstle TL, Ibrahim AMS, Kim PS, Lee BT, Lin SJ. A plastic surgery application in evolution: three-dimensional printing. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014; 133 (2) 446-451
  • 29 Pallanch J. Introduction to 3D imaging technologies for the facial plastic surgeon. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2011; 19 (4) xv-xvi , vii
  • 30 Chen HH, Javadi P, Daines SM, Williams III EF. Quantitative assessment of the longevity of poly-L-lactic acid as a volumizing filler using 3-dimensional photography. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2015; 17 (1) 39-43
  • 31 Most SP, Alsarraf R, Larrabee Jr WF. Outcomes of facial cosmetic procedures. Facial Plast Surg 2002; 18 (2) 119-124
  • 32 Honrado CP, Lee S, Bloomquist DS, Larrabee Jr WF. Quantitative assessment of nasal changes after maxillomandibular surgery using a 3-dimensional digital imaging system. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2006; 8 (1) 26-35
  • 33 van Heerbeek N, Ingels KJAO, van Loon B, Plooij JM, Bergé SJ. Three dimensional measurement of rhinoplasty results. Rhinology 2009; 47 (2) 121-125
  • 34 van Loon B, van Heerbeek N, Maal TJJ , et al. Postoperative volume increase of facial soft tissue after percutaneous versus endonasal osteotomy technique in rhinoplasty using 3D stereophotogrammetry. Rhinology 2011; 49 (1) 121-126
  • 35 van Loon B, Reddy SG, van Heerbeek N , et al. 3D stereophotogrammetric analysis of lip and nasal symmetry after primary cheiloseptoplasty in complete unilateral cleft lip repair. Rhinology 2011; 49 (5) 546-553
  • 36 van Loon B, Maal TJ, Plooij JM , et al. 3D Stereophotogrammetric assessment of pre- and postoperative volumetric changes in the cleft lip and palate nose. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010; 39 (6) 534-540
  • 37 Simanca E, Morris D, Zhao L, Reisberg D, Viana G. Measuring progressive soft tissue change with nasoalveolar molding using a three-dimensional system. J Craniofac Surg 2011; 22 (5) 1622-1625
  • 38 Dixon TK, Caughlin BP, Munaretto N, Toriumi DM. Three-dimensional evaluation of unilateral cleft rhinoplasty results. Facial Plast Surg 2013; 29 (2) 106-115
  • 39 Bared A, Rashan A, Caughlin BP, Toriumi DM. Lower lateral cartilage repositioning: objective analysis using 3-dimensional imaging. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2014; 16 (4) 261-267
  • 40 van Loon B, van Heerbeek N, Bierenbroodspot F , et al. Three-dimensional changes in nose and upper lip volume after orthognathic surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2015; 44 (1) 83-89
  • 41 Lee S. Three-dimensional photography and its application to facial plastic surgery. Arch Fac Plast Surg 2004; 6: 410-414
  • 42 Cingi C, Oghan F. Teaching 3D sculpting to facial plastic surgeons. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2011; 19 (4) 603-614 , viii
  • 43 Choi JW, Kim N. Clinical application of three-dimensional printing technology in craniofacial plastic surgery. Arch Plast Surg 2015; 42 (3) 267-277
  • 44 Michalski MH, Ross JS. The shape of things to come: 3D printing in medicine. JAMA 2014; 312 (21) 2213-2214
  • 45 Kim YS, Shin YS, Park Y , et al. The application of three-dimensional printing in animal model of augmentation rhinoplasty. Ann Biomed Eng 2015; 43 (9) 2153-2162
  • 46 Lindsay RW, Herberg M, Liacouras P. The use of three-dimensional digital technology and additive manufacturing to create templates for soft-tissue reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 130 (4) 629e-631e
  • 47 Pallanch J. 3D and the next dimension for facial plastic surgery. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2011; 19 (4) xix-xxi