Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials in (Un)aided Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Adults

Bram Van Dun; Anna Kania; Harvey Dillon

doi:10.1055/s-0035-1570333

Seminars in Hearing, Table of Contents

Semin Hear 2016; 37(01): 009-024
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1570333

Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials in (Un)aided Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Adults

Bram Van Dun

¹The HEARing CRC, Sydney, Australia

²National Acoustic Laboratories, Sydney, Australia

,

Anna Kania

¹The HEARing CRC, Sydney, Australia

,

Harvey Dillon

¹The HEARing CRC, Sydney, Australia

²National Acoustic Laboratories, Sydney, Australia

› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) are influenced by the characteristics of the stimulus, including level and hearing aid gain. Previous studies have measured CAEPs aided and unaided in individuals with normal hearing. There is a significant difference between providing amplification to a person with normal hearing and a person with hearing loss. This study investigated this difference and the effects of stimulus signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and audibility on the CAEP amplitude in a population with hearing loss. Twelve normal-hearing participants and 12 participants with a hearing loss participated in this study. Three speech sounds—/m/, /g/, and /t/—were presented in the free field. Unaided stimuli were presented at 55, 65, and 75 dB sound pressure level (SPL) and aided stimuli at 55 dB SPL with three different gains in steps of 10 dB. CAEPs were recorded and their amplitudes analyzed. Stimulus SNRs and audibility were determined. No significant effect of stimulus level or hearing aid gain was found in normal hearers. Conversely, a significant effect was found in hearing-impaired individuals. Audibility of the signal, which in some cases is determined by the signal level relative to threshold and in other cases by the SNR, is the dominant factor explaining changes in CAEP amplitude. CAEPs can potentially be used to assess the effects of hearing aid gain in hearing-impaired users.

Keywords

Cortical auditory evoked potential - hearing-impaired - normal-hearing - hearing aid - signal-to-noise ratio - audibility

Full Text

References

References
1 Martin BA, Tremblay KL, Stapells DR. Principles and applications of cortical auditory evoked potentials. In: Burkard R, Eggermont J, Don M, , eds. Auditory Evoked Potentials: Basic Principles and Clinical Application. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2007: 482-507
2 Ponton CW, Eggermont JJ, Kwong B, Don M. Maturation of human central auditory system activity: evidence from multi-channel evoked potentials. Clin Neurophysiol 2000; 111 (2) 220-236
3 Sharma A, Dorman MF, Spahr AJ. A sensitive period for the development of the central auditory system in children with cochlear implants: implications for age of implantation. Ear Hear 2002; 23 (6) 532-539
4 Hyde M. The N1 response and its applications. Audiol Neurootol 1997; 2 (5) 281-307
5 Lightfoot G. Summary of the N1–P2 cortical auditory evoked potential to estimate the auditory threshold in adults. Semin Hear 2016; 37 (01) 1-8
6 Dillon H. So, baby, how does it sound? Cortical assessment of infants with hearing aids. Hear J 2005; 58 (10) 10-17
7 Punch S, Van Dun B, King A, Carter L, Pearce W. Clinical experience of using cortical auditory evoked potentials in the treatment of infant hearing loss in Australia. Semin Hear 2016; 37 (01) 36-52
8 Kosaner J, Bayguzina S, Gültekin M. Monitoring adequacy of audio processor programs and auditory maturity using aided cortical assessment (ACA). Paper presented at: World Congress of Audiology; May 3–7, 2014; Brisbane, Australia
9 Gilley PM, Sharma A, Dorman M, Finley CC, Panch AS, Martin K. Minimization of cochlear implant stimulus artifact in cortical auditory evoked potentials. Clin Neurophysiol 2006; 117 (8) 1772-1782
10 Mc Laughlin M, Lopez Valdes A, Reilly RB, Zeng FG. Cochlear implant artifact attenuation in late auditory evoked potentials: a single channel approach. Hear Res 2013; 302: 84-95
11 Friesen LM, Picton TW. A method for removing cochlear implant artifact. Hear Res 2010; 259 (1–2) 95-106
12 Sharma A, Campbell J, Cardon G. Developmental and cross-modal plasticity in deafness: evidence from the P1 and N1 event related potentials in cochlear implanted children. Int J Psychophysiol 2015; 95 (2) 135-144
13 Sharma A, Martin K, Roland P , et al. P1 latency as a biomarker for central auditory development in children with hearing impairment. J Am Acad Audiol 2005; 16 (8) 564-573
14 Ponton CW, Don M, Eggermont JJ, Waring MD, Kwong B, Masuda A. Auditory system plasticity in children after long periods of complete deafness. Neuroreport 1996; 8 (1) 61-65
15 Purdy SC, Kelly AS. Changes in speech perception and auditory evoked potentials over time after unilateral cochlear implantation in postlinguistically deaf adults. Semin Hear 2016; 37 (01) 62-73
16 Martin BA, Boothroyd A. Cortical, auditory, evoked potentials in response to changes of spectrum and amplitude. J Acoust Soc Am 2000; 107 (4) 2155-2161
17 Won JH, Clinard CG, Kwon S , et al. Relationship between behavioral and physiological spectral-ripple discrimination. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2011; 12 (3) 375-393
18 Ross B, Tremblay KL, Picton TW. Physiological detection of interaural phase differences. J Acoust Soc Am 2007; 121 (2) 1017-1027
19 Miller S, Zhang Y. Neural coding of phonemic fricative contrast with and without hearing aid. Ear Hear 2014; 35 (4) e122-e133
20 Picton T. Hearing in time: evoked potential studies of temporal processing. Ear Hear 2013; 34 (4) 385-401
21 Tomlin D, Rance G. Maturation of the central auditory nervous system in children with auditory processing disorder. Semin Hear 2016; 37 (01) 74-83
22 Tremblay K, Kraus N, McGee T, Ponton C, Otis B. Central auditory plasticity: changes in the N1-P2 complex after speech-sound training. Ear Hear 2001; 22 (2) 79-90
23 Barlow N, Purdy SC, Sharma M, Giles E, Narne V. The effect of short-term auditory training on speech in noise perception and cortical auditory evoked potentials in adults with cochlear implants. Semin Hear 2016; 37 (01) 84-98
24 Hoppe U, Rosanowski F, Iro H, Eysholdt U. Loudness perception and late auditory evoked potentials in adult cochlear implant users. Scand Audiol 2001; 30 (2) 119-125
25 Bidelman GM, Villafuerte JW, Moreno S, Alain C. Age-related changes in the subcortical-cortical encoding and categorical perception of speech. Neurobiol Aging 2014; 35 (11) 2526-2540
26 Ross B, Fujioka T, Tremblay KL, Picton TW. Aging in binaural hearing begins in mid-life: evidence from cortical auditory-evoked responses to changes in interaural phase. J Neurosci 2007; 27 (42) 11172-11178
27 Tremblay KL, Piskosz M, Souza P. Effects of age and age-related hearing loss on the neural representation of speech cues. Clin Neurophysiol 2003; 114 (7) 1332-1343
28 Barnet AB. EEG audiometry in children under three years of age. Acta Otolaryngol 1971; 72 (1) 1-13
29 Rapin I, Graziani LJ. Auditory-evoked responses in normal, brain-damaged, and deaf infants. Neurology 1967; 17 (9) 881-894
30 Billings CJ, Tremblay KL, Souza PE, Binns MA. Effects of hearing aid amplification and stimulus intensity on cortical auditory evoked potentials. Audiol Neurootol 2007; 12 (4) 234-246
31 Billings CJ, Tremblay KL, Miller CW. Aided cortical auditory evoked potentials in response to changes in hearing aid gain. Int J Audiol 2011; 50 (7) 459-467
32 Marynewich S, Jenstad LM, Stapells DR. Slow cortical potentials and amplification—Part I: N1–P2 measures. Int J Otolaryngol 2012; 2012: 921513
33 Jenstad LM, Marynewich S, Stapells DR. Slow cortical potentials and amplification—Part II: Acoustic measures. Int J Otolaryngol 2012; 2012: 386542
34 Cody DTR, Klass DW. Cortical audiometry. Potential pitfalls in testing. Arch Otolaryngol 1968; 88 (4) 396-406
35 Korczak PA, Kurtzberg D, Stapells DR. Effects of sensorineural hearing loss and personal hearing aids on cortical event-related potential and behavioral measures of speech-sound processing. Ear Hear 2005; 26 (2) 165-185
36 Souza PE, Tremblay KL. New perspectives on assessing amplification effects. Trends Amplif 2006; 10 (3) 119-143
37 Carter L, Golding M, Dillon H, Seymour J. The detection of infant cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) using statistical and visual detection techniques. J Am Acad Audiol 2010; 21 (5) 347-356
38 Carter L, Dillon H, Seymour J, Seeto M, Van Dun B. Cortical auditory-evoked potentials (CAEPs) in adults in response to filtered speech stimuli. J Am Acad Audiol 2013; 24 (9) 807-822
39 Chang HW, Dillon H, Carter L, van Dun B, Young ST. The relationship between cortical auditory evoked potential (CAEP) detection and estimated audibility in infants with sensorineural hearing loss. Int J Audiol 2012; 51 (9) 663-670
40 Golding M, Dillon H, Seymour J, Carter L. The detection of adult cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) using an automated statistic and visual detection. Int J Audiol 2009; 48 (12) 833-842
41 Van Dun B, Carter L, Dillon H. Sensitivity of cortical auditory evoked potential detection for hearing-impaired infants in response to short speech sounds. Audiol Res 2012; 2e13: 65-76
42 Hagerman B, Olofsson Å. A method to measure the effect of noise reduction algorithms using simultaneous speech and noise. Acta Acust United Acust 2004; 90 (2) 356-361
43 International Organisation for Standardization. Acoustics—Reference zero for the calibration of audiometric equipment—Part 2: Reference equivalent threshold sound pressure levels for pure tones and insert earphones. Geneva, Switzerland; 1994
44 American Electroencephalographic Society. American Electroencephalographic Society guidelines for standard electrode position nomenclature. J Clin Neurophysiol 1991; 8 (2) 200-202
45 Billings C. Acoustic signal-to-noise ratios dominates auditory long latency responses. International Evoked Response Audiometry Study Group. June 9–13, 2013; New Orleans, LA, USA
46 Picton TW, Woods DL, Baribeau-Braun J, Healey TMG. Evoked potential audiometry. J Otolaryngol 1976; 6 (2) 90-119
47 Ross B, Lütkenhöner B, Pantev C, Hoke M. Frequency-specific threshold determination with the CERAgram method: basic principle and retrospective evaluation of data. Audiol Neurootol 1999; 4 (1) 12-27
48 Tremblay KL, Billings CJ, Friesen LM, Souza PE. Neural representation of amplified speech sounds. Ear Hear 2006; 27 (2) 93-103
49 Killion MC. Noise of ears and microphones. J Acoust Soc Am 1976; 59 (2) 424-433
50 Billings CJ, Papesh MA, Penman TM, Baltzell LS, Gallun FJ. Clinical use of aided cortical auditory evoked potentials as a measure of physiological detection or physiological discrimination. Int J Otolaryngol 2012; 2012: 365752
51 Ching TYC, Dillon H, Marnane V , et al. Outcomes of early- and late-identified children at 3 years of age: findings from a prospective population-based study. Ear Hear 2013; 34 (5) 535-552
52 Easwar V, Glista D, Purcell DW, Scollie SD. Hearing aid processing changes tone burst onset: effect on cortical auditory evoked potentials in individuals with normal audiometric thresholds. Am J Audiol 2012; 21 (1) 82-90
53 Easwar V, Purcell DW, Scollie SD. Electroacoustic comparison of hearing aid output of phonemes in running speech versus isolation: implications for aided cortical auditory evoked potentials testing. Int J Otolaryngol 2012; 2012: 518202
54 Easwar V, Glista D, Purcell DW, Scollie SD. The effect of stimulus choice on cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEP): consideration of speech segment positioning within naturally produced speech. Int J Audiol 2012; 51 (12) 926-931
55 Ching TYC, Zhang V, Hou S, Van Buynder P. Cortical auditory evoked potentials reveal changes in audibility with nonlinear frequency compression in hearing aids for children: clinical implications. Semin Hear 2016; 37 (01) 25-35
56 Glista D, Easwar V, Purcell DW, Scollie SD. A pilot study on cortical auditory evoked potentials in children: aided CAEPs reflect improved high-frequency audibility with frequency compression hearing aid technology. Int J Otolaryngol 2012; 2012: 982294
57 Picton TW, Alain C, Otten L, Ritter W, Achim A. Mismatch negativity: different water in the same river. Audiol Neurootol 2000; 5 (3–4) 111-139
58 Billings CJ. Uses and limitations of electrophysiology with hearing aids. Semin Hear 2013; 34 (4) 257-269
59 Tremblay KL, Kalstein L, Billings CJ, Souza PE. The neural representation of consonant-vowel transitions in adults who wear hearing aids. Trends Amplif 2006; 10 (3) 155-162