Download PDF
Semin Reprod Med 2016; 34(03): 168-174
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1571437
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Contraception in the Developing World: Special Considerations

Gillian B. Schivone
1   Department of OB/GYN, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
,
Paul D. Blumenthal
1   Department of OB/GYN, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
08 March 2016 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) estimates that there are 225 million women and girls with unmet contraceptive need yearly. Unmet need for contraception is defined as women who desire a delay in childbearing and are not using a modern method of contraception. It is projected that providing contraception to these women would avert 36 million abortions, 70,000 maternal deaths, and 52 million unintended pregnancies overall. In the past 30 years, there has been an increase both in population and in contraception use in the developing world. As a result, it is estimated that in 2015 there were 500 million contraceptive users in developing countries, which is nearly double the prevalence in 2000. Unfortunately, women and girls in developing nations still face many obstacles in obtaining modern methods of contraception. Particular challenges in the developing world include lack of access due to inadequate number of trained providers, fewer method options, and “stock-outs” of contraceptive supplies. Innovative strategies for decreasing unmet need will have to address these challenges, and will necessarily involve programmatic solutions such as community-based distribution and social marketing campaigns. Additionally, increasing uptake of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods will be essential for achieving the goal of decreasing unmet need.

Keywords

contraception - unmet need - LARC - task shifting - developing countries
 

  • References

  • 1 USAID. Family Planning from A to Z. FIGO World Congress of Gynecology and Obstetrics; 2015; Vancouver, BC; 2015
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 World Health Organization. Reproductive health strategy to accelerate progress towards the attainment of international development goals and targets. 2004. Available at: http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/general/RHR_04_8/en/ . Accessed October 12, 2015
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Jacobstein R. Long-acting and permanent contraception: an international development, service delivery perspective. J Midwifery Womens Health 2007; 52 (4) 361-367
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Sinding SW. What has happened to family planning since Cairo and what are the prospects for the future?. Contraception 2008; 78 (4, Suppl): S3-S6
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Cleland J, Bernstein S, Ezeh A, Faundes A, Glasier A, Innis J. Family planning: the unfinished agenda. Lancet 2006; 368 (9549) 1810-1827
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Altshuler A, Blumenthal PD. A Global Overview of Use and Practice of Contraception: Past, Present, and Future. In: Arora M, Blumenthal PD, Sheriar N, Joshi R, eds. World Clinics: Obstetrics and Gynecology. New Delhi, India: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers; 2013: 11-28
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Glasier A, Gülmezoglu AM, Schmid GP, Moreno CG, Van Look PFA. Sexual and reproductive health: a matter of life and death. Lancet 2006; 368 (9547) 1595-1607
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 United Nations. Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls. 2015. Available at: http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/gender-equality/ . Accessed October 12, 2015
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Tsui AO, Casterline J, Singh S , et al. Managing unplanned pregnancies in five countries: perspectives on contraception and abortion decisions. Glob Public Health 2011; 6 (Suppl. 01) S1-S24
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Alkema L, Kantorova V, Menozzi C, Biddlecom A. National, regional, and global rates and trends in contraceptive prevalence and unmet need for family planning between 1990 and 2015: a systematic and comprehensive analysis. Lancet 2013; 381 (9878) 1642-1652
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Cleland J, Machiyama K. Unmet need for family planning: past achievements and remaining challenges. Semin Reprod Med 2015; 33 (1) 11-16
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Bongaarts J. Global fertility and population trends. Semin Reprod Med 2015; 33 (1) 5-10
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Francis P. Encyclical Letter Laudato Si': On Care for our Common Home. 2015. Available at: http://w2.vatican.va/content/francesco/en/encyclicals/documents/papa-francesco_20150524_enciclica-laudato-si.html . Accessed October 22, 2015
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Ross JA, Winfrey WL. Contraceptive use, intention to use and unmet need during the extended postpartum period. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2001; 27 (1) 20-27
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Collumbien M, Gerressu M, Cleland J. Non-use and use of ineffective methods of contraception. In: Ezzati M, Lopez AD, Rodgers A, Murray CJL, eds. Comparative Quantification of Health Risks: The Global and Regional Burden of Disease Attributable to Selected Major Risk Factors. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2004: 1255-319
    Google Scholar
  • 16 World Health Organization. Unsafe Abortion: Global and Regional Estimates of the Incidence of Unsafe Abortion and Associated Mortality in 2008. 6th ed. Geneva: WHO; 2011
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Gaffikin L. Family planning and the environment: connected through human and community well-being. Outlook 2010; 27 (1) 1-8
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 United Nations. Goal 2: Achieve Universal Primary Education. 2015. Available at: http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/education.shtml . Accessed October 22, 2015
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Sedgh G, Hussain R. Reasons for contraceptive nonuse among women having unmet need for contraception in developing countries. Stud Fam Plann 2014; 45 (2) 151-169
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Blumenthal PD, Voedisch A, Gemzell-Danielsson K. Strategies to prevent unintended pregnancy: increasing use of long-acting reversible contraception. Hum Reprod Update 2011; 17 (1) 121-137
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Prata N, Weidert K, Fraser A, Gessessew A. Meeting rural demand: a case for combining community-based distribution and social marketing of injectable contraceptives in Tigray, Ethiopia. PLoS ONE 2013; 8 (7) e68794
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Bendavid E, Avila P, Miller G. United States aid policy and induced abortion in sub-Saharan Africa. Bull World Health Organ 2011; 89 (12) 873-880C
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Malhotra V, Bhat S. Strategies for family planning going forward - social marketing & expanding contraceptive choices package. Indian J Med Res 2014; 140 (Suppl): S6-S8
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Shelton JD, Angle MA, Jacobstein RA. Medical barriers to access to family planning. Lancet 1992; 340 (8831) 1334-1335
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 World Health Organization. Medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use. 2015 . Available at: http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/family_planning/Ex-Summ-MEC-5/en/ . Accessed October 21, 2015
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 FHI360. Contraceptive Technology Innovation. 2014. Available at: http://www.fhi360.org/resource/contraceptive-technology-innovation-brochure . Accessed October 23, 2015
    PubMed
  • 27 World Health Organization. Task shifting to improve access to contraceptive methods. 2013. Available at: http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/family_planning/task_shifting_access_contraceptives/en/ . Accessed October 21, 2015
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Charyeva Z, Oguntunde O, Orobaton N , et al. Task shifting provision of contraceptive implants to community health extension workers: results of operations research in northern Nigeria. Glob Health Sci Pract 2015; 3 (3) 382-394
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Marie Stopes International. Innovating mobile service delivery to increase FP choice and access for the per-urban poor. 2015. Available at: https://mariestopes.org/data-research/resources/innovating-mobile-service-delivery-increase-fp-choice-and-access-peri-urban . Accessed October 22, 2015
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Paravani A, Orgocka A. Contraceptive social marketing in Albania - the NESMARK story. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2013; 18 (3) 221-229
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Blumenthal PD, Shah NM, Jain K , et al. Revitalizing long-acting reversible contraceptives in settings with high unmet need: a multicountry experience matching demand creation and service delivery. Contraception 2013; 87 (2) 170-175
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Duvall S, Thurston S, Weinberger M, Nuccio O, Fuchs-Montgomery N. Scaling up delivery of contraceptive implants in sub-Saharan Africa: operational experiences of Marie Stopes International. Glob Health Sci Pract 2014; 2 (1) 72-92
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Khu NH, Vwalika B, Karita E , et al. Fertility goal-based counseling increases contraceptive implant and IUD use in HIV-discordant couples in Rwanda and Zambia. Contraception 2013; 88 (1) 74-82
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Chen BA, Reeves MF, Hayes JL, Hohmann HL, Perriera LK, Creinin MD. Postplacental or delayed insertion of the levonorgestrel intrauterine device after vaginal delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 116 (5) 1079-1087
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Mohamed SA, Kamel MA, Shaaban OM, Salem HT. Acceptability for the use of postpartum intrauterine contraceptive devices: Assiut experience. Med Princ Pract 2003; 12 (3) 170-175
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 El-Tagy A, Sakr E, Sokal DC, Issa AH. Safety and acceptability of post-abortal IUD insertion and the importance of counseling. Contraception 2003; 67 (3) 229-234
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Bednarek PH, Creinin MD, Reeves MF, Cwiak C, Espey E, Jensen JT ; Post-Aspiration IUD Randomization (PAIR) Study Trial Group. Immediate versus delayed IUD insertion after uterine aspiration. N Engl J Med 2011; 364 (23) 2208-2217
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Senlet P, Cagatay L, Ergin J, Mathis J. Bridging the Gap: Integrating Family Planning With Abortion Services in Turkey. Int Fam Plan Perspect 2001; 27 (2) 90-95
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Blumenthal PD, Eber M, Vajpayee J. Dedicated inserter facilitates immediate postpartum IUD insertion. Glob Health Sci Pract 2013; 1 (3) 428-429
    PubMedGoogle Scholar