Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 2016; 38(02): 053-055
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1571850
Editorial
Thieme Publicações Ltda Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

The Potential of Cesarean Section as a Causative Factor of Chronic Pelvic Pain

O potencial da cesárea como elemento causador de dor pélvica crônica
Antonio Alberto Nogueira
1   Gynecology and Obstetrics Department, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil
,
Júlio Cesar Rosa e Silva
1   Gynecology and Obstetrics Department, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil
,
Omero Benedito Poli Neto
1   Gynecology and Obstetrics Department, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

11 November 2015

04 December 2015

Publication Date:
01 February 2016 (online)

Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) is a prevalent condition among women, particularly those of reproductive age, estimated at around 4%.[1] In Brazil, the prevalence data are lacking, but it may be higher than 10%.[2] [3] The initial diagnosis is eminently clinical and, according to the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP), it consists of chronic or persistent pain perceived in pelvis-related structures, often associated with emotional, sexual, behavioral, and negative cognitive consequences, as well as symptoms suggestive of disorders in these systems. It includes both cyclic pain, such as dysmenorrhea, and the acyclic type. Although six months is the most widely used time criterion, it is arbitrary and, if the pain is not typically acute and central sensitization mechanisms are well documented (especially hyperalgesia), it can be considered chronic, regardless of time of symptom onset.

Among the several risk factors attributed to CPP,[4] we highlight the history of prior abdominal surgery, particularly low transverse incision of the abdominal wall (Pfannenstiel), commonly used in cesarean sections (CS) and other gynecological surgeries.[5] Considering that CS is the most frequently performed abdominal surgery in the world[6] and the fact that CS rates in Brazil are very high,[7] it is known that many CPP cases can be attributed to CS.[8]

In clinical practice, many professionals, especially gynecologists and obstetricians, attribute the development of postoperative adhesions as the cause of pain. Moreover, they underestimate the diagnosis of pain originating in the abdominal wall,[9] which is a confirmed cause of CPP, of simple treatment and a good response rate, preventing the need for surgical approach to clarify the diagnosis.

 
  • References

  • 1 Latthe P, Latthe M, Say L, Gülmezoglu M, Khan KS. WHO systematic review of prevalence of chronic pelvic pain: a neglected reproductive health morbidity. BMC Public Health 2006; 6: 177
  • 2 Silva GPOG, Nascimento AL, Michelazzo D , et al. High prevalence of chronic pelvic pain in women in Ribeirão Preto, Brazil and direct association with abdominal surgery. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2011; 66 (8) 1307-1312
  • 3 Coelho LS, Brito LM, Chein MB , et al. Prevalence and conditions associated with chronic pelvic pain in women from São Luís, Brazil. Braz J Med Biol Res 2014; 47 (9) 818-825
  • 4 Latthe P, Mignini L, Gray R, Hills R, Khan K. Factors predisposing women to chronic pelvic pain: systematic review. BMJ 2006; 332 (7544) 749-755
  • 5 Loos MJ, Scheltinga MR, Mulders LG, Roumen RM. The Pfannenstiel incision as a source of chronic pain. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 111 (4) 839-846
  • 6 Gibbons L, Belizan JM, Lauer JA, Betran AP, Merialdi M, Althabe F. Inequities in the use of cesarean section deliveries in the world. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 206 (4) 331.e1-331.e19
  • 7 Ribeiro VS, Figueiredo FP, Silva AA , et al. Why are the rates of cesarean section in Brazil higher in more developed cities than in less developed ones?. Braz J Med Biol Res 2007; 40 (9) 1211-1220
  • 8 Almeida EC, Nogueira AA, Candido dos Reis FJ, Rosa e Silva JC. Cesarean section as a cause of chronic pelvic pain. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2002; 79 (2) 101-104
  • 9 Montenegro ML, Gomide LB, Mateus-Vasconcelos EL , et al. Abdominal myofascial pain syndrome must be considered in the differential diagnosis of chronic pelvic pain. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2009; 147 (1) 21-24
  • 10 Perry CP. Peripheral neuropathies and pelvic pain: diagnosis and management. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2003; 46 (4) 789-796
  • 11 Partanen JV, Ojala TA, Arokoski JP. Myofascial syndrome and pain: A neurophysiological approach. Pathophysiology 2010; 17 (1) 19-28
  • 12 Lindsetmo RO, Stulberg J. Chronic abdominal wall pain—a diagnostic challenge for the surgeon. Am J Surg 2009; 198 (1) 129-134
  • 13 Jarrell J. Endometriosis and abdominal myofascial pain in adults and adolescents. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2011; 15 (5) 368-376
  • 14 Jarrell J, Giamberardino MA, Robert M, Nasr-Esfahani M. Bedside testing for chronic pelvic pain: discriminating visceral from somatic pain. Pain Res Treat 2011; 2011: 692102
  • 15 Simons DG. The nature of myofascial trigger points. Clin J Pain 1995; 11 (1) 83-84
  • 16 Tough EA, White AR, Richards S, Campbell J. Variability of criteria used to diagnose myofascial trigger point pain syndrome—evidence from a review of the literature. Clin J Pain 2007; 23 (3) 278-286
  • 17 Ling FW, Slocumb JC. Use of trigger point injections in chronic pelvic pain. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 1993; 20 (4) 809-815
  • 18 Iwama H, Akama Y. The superiority of water-diluted 0.25% to neat 1% lidocaine for trigger-point injections in myofascial pain syndrome: a prospective, randomized, double-blinded trial. Anesth Analg 2000; 91 (2) 408-409
  • 19 Montenegro MLLS, Braz CA, Rosa-e-Silva JC, Candido-dos-Reis FJ, Nogueira AA, Poli-Neto OB. Anaesthetic injection versus ischemic compression for the pain relief of abdominal wall trigger points in women with chronic pelvic pain. BMC Anesthesiol 2015; 15: 175
  • 20 Ney JP, Devine EB, Watanabe JH, Sullivan SD. Comparative efficacy of oral pharmaceuticals for the treatment of chronic peripheral neuropathic pain: meta-analysis and indirect treatment comparisons. Pain Med 2013; 14 (5) 706-719
  • 21 Vo T, Rice AS, Dworkin RH. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for neuropathic pain: how do we explain continued widespread use?. Pain 2009; 143 (3) 169-171
  • 22 Mettler L, Alhujeily M. Role of laparoscopy in identifying the clinical significance and cause of adhesions and chronic pelvic pain: a retrospective review at the Kiel School of Gynecological Endoscopy. JSLS 2007; 11 (3) 303-308
  • 23 Imudia AN, Kumar S, Saed GM, Diamond MP. Pathogenesis of Intra-abdominal and pelvic adhesion development. Semin Reprod Med 2008; 26 (4) 289-297
  • 24 Lauder CI, Garcea G, Strickland A, Maddern GJ. Abdominal adhesion prevention: still a sticky subject?. Dig Surg 2010; 27 (5) 347-358
  • 25 Walfisch A, Beloosesky R, Shrim A, Hallak M. Adhesion prevention after cesarean delivery: evidence, and lack of it. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 211 (5) 446-452
  • 26 Sharma D, Dahiya K, Duhan N, Bansal R. Diagnostic laparoscopy in chronic pelvic pain. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2011; 283 (2) 295-297
  • 27 Husain M, Sachan PK, Khan S, Lama L, Khan RN. Role of diagnostic laparoscopy in chronic and recurrent abdominal pain. Trop Gastroenterol 2013; 34 (3) 170-173
  • 28 ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins--Gynecology. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 51. Chronic pelvic pain. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 103 (3) 589-605
  • 29 Sulaiman H, Gabella G, Davis MSc C , et al. Presence and distribution of sensory nerve fibers in human peritoneal adhesions. Ann Surg 2001; 234 (2) 256-261
  • 30 Gerner-Rasmussen J, Burcharth J, Gögenur I. The efficacy of adhesiolysis on chronic abdominal pain: a systematic review. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2015; 400 (5) 567-576