Incidence, Predictors, and Postoperative Complications of Blood Transfusion in Thoracic and Lumbar Fusion Surgery: An Analysis of 13,695 Patients from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database
10 October 2015
03 February 2016
31 March 2016 (eFirst)
Study Design Retrospective cohort study.
Objective To identify predictive factors for blood transfusion and associated complications in lumbar and thoracic fusion surgeries.
Methods The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database was used to identify patients who underwent lumbar or thoracic fusion from 2010 to 2013. Multivariate analysis was used to determine predictive factors and postoperative complications associated with transfusion.
Results Out of 13,695 patients, 13,170 had lumbar fusion and 525 had thoracic fusion. The prevalence of transfusion was 31.8% for thoracic and 17.0% for lumbar fusion. The multivariate analysis showed that age between 50 and 60, age between 61 and 70, age > 70, dyspnea, American Society of Anesthesiologists class 3, bleeding disease, multilevel surgery, extended surgical time, return to operation room, and higher preoperative blood urea nitrogen (BUN) were predictors of blood transfusion for lumbar fusion. Multilevel surgery, preoperative BUN, and extended surgical time were predictors of transfusion for thoracic fusion. Patients receiving transfusions who underwent lumbar fusion were more likely to develop wound infection, venous thromboembolism, pulmonary embolism, and myocardial infarction and had longer hospital stay. Patients receiving transfusions who underwent thoracic fusion were more likely to have extended hospital stay.
Conclusion This study characterizes incidence, predictors, and postoperative complications associated with blood transfusion in thoracic and lumbar fusion. Pre- and postoperative planning for patients deemed to be at high risk of requiring blood transfusion might reduce postoperative complications in this population.
* These authors equally contributed to this paper.
- 1 Starkweather A. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion: an old concept with new techniques. J Neurosci Nurs 2006; 38 (1) 13-20 , 30
- 2 Huang YH, Ou CY. Significant blood loss in lumbar fusion surgery for degenerative spine. World Neurosurg 2015; 84 (3) 780-785
- 3 Martin CT, Pugely AJ, Gao Y, Mendoza-Lattes SA, Weinstein SL. The impact of renal impairment on short-term morbidity risk following lumbar spine surgeries. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2015; 40 (12) 909-916
- 4 Berenholtz SM, Pronovost PJ, Mullany D , et al. Predictors of transfusion for spinal surgery in Maryland, 1997 to 2000. Transfusion 2002; 42 (2) 183-189
- 5 Blumberg N. Allogeneic transfusion and infection: economic and clinical implications. Semin Hematol 1997; 34 (3) (Suppl. 02) 34-40
- 6 Innerhofer P, Walleczek C, Luz G , et al. Transfusion of buffy coat-depleted blood components and risk of postoperative infection in orthopedic patients. Transfusion 1999; 39 (6) 625-632
- 7 Osterhoff G, Burla L, Werner CM , et al. Role of pre-operative blood transfusion and subcutaneous fat thickness as risk factors for surgical site infection after posterior thoracic spine stabilization. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2015; 16 (3) 333-337
- 8 Basques BA, Anandasivam NS, Webb ML , et al. Risk factors for blood transfusion with primary posterior lumbar fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2015; 40 (22) 1792-1797
- 9 Birkmeyer JD, Shahian DM, Dimick JB , et al. Blueprint for a new American College of Surgeons: National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg 2008; 207 (5) 777-782
- 10 Raval MV, Dillon PW, Bruny JL , et al; ACS NSQIP Pediatric Steering Committee. Pediatric American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: feasibility of a novel, prospective assessment of surgical outcomes. J Pediatr Surg 2011; 46 (1) 115-121
- 11 Alam MM, Sobani ZA, Shamim MS, Ahmad K, Minai F. Primary elective spine arthrodesis: audit of institutional cross matched to transfused (C/T) ratio to develop blood product ordering guidelines. Surg Neurol Int 2013; 4 (5) (Suppl. 05) S368-S372
- 12 Zou H, Li Z, Sheng H , et al. Intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage, and recovery in patients undergoing lumbar spinal surgery. BMC Surg 2015; 15: 76
- 13 Zheng F, Cammisa Jr FP, Sandhu HS, Girardi FP, Khan SN. Factors predicting hospital stay, operative time, blood loss, and transfusion in patients undergoing revision posterior lumbar spine decompression, fusion, and segmental instrumentation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2002; 27 (8) 818-824
- 14 Butler JS, Burke JP, Dolan RT , et al. Risk analysis of blood transfusion requirements in emergency and elective spinal surgery. Eur Spine J 2011; 20 (5) 753-758
- 15 Blanchette CM, Wang PF, Joshi AV, Asmussen M, Saunders W, Kruse P. Cost and utilization of blood transfusion associated with spinal surgeries in the United States. Eur Spine J 2007; 16 (3) 353-363
- 16 Chawla T, Kakepoto GN, Khan MA. An audit of blood cross-match ordering practices at the Aga Khan University Hospital: first step towards a Maximum Surgical Blood Ordering Schedule. J Pak Med Assoc 2001; 51 (7) 251-254
- 17 Shander A, Hofmann A, Ozawa S, Theusinger OM, Gombotz H, Spahn DR. Activity-based costs of blood transfusions in surgical patients at four hospitals. Transfusion 2010; 50 (4) 753-765