Segmental Surface Referencing during Intraoperative Three-dimensional Image-Guided Spine Navigation: An Early Validation with Comparison to Automated Referencing
25 October 2015
16 February 2016
20 April 2016 (eFirst)
Study Design Interventional human cadaver study.
Objective Intraoperative three-dimensional (3-D)-guided navigation improves spine instrumentation accuracy. However, image acquisition may need to be repeated with segment hypermobility or distant target from reference frame (RF). The current study evaluates the usefulness of internal metal fiducials (IMFs) as surface references in enhancing registration accuracy and avoiding repeating imaging.
Methods Six fresh-frozen cadaveric human torsos were utilized. Posterior C1–T2 exposure was done, and three IMFs were inserted per level; intraoperative 3-D images were then acquired. Two registration methods were utilized: autoregistration (AR, group 1) and point registration using IMF (IMFR, group 2). Registration accuracy was checked by identifying IMFs in both groups. Pedicle screws inserted into C2, C4, C5, and C7 based on the two registration methods (three cadavers each) with RF on C7 and then on C2.
Results The mean registration error was lower with IMFR compared with AR (0.35 ± 0.5 mm versus 2.02 ± 0.85 mm, p = 0.0001). Overall, 34 pedicle screws were inserted (AR, 18; IMFR, 16). Final screw placement was comparable using both techniques (p = 0.58). Lateral screws violations were observed in four IMFR screws (1 to 2 mm) as compared with five in AR group (2 to 3 mm). Reregistration after moving RF to C2 was possible using surface screws in IMFR group, thus avoiding new 3-D image acquisition.
Conclusion During intraoperative 3-D navigation in spine procedures, surface fiducial registration using IMF provided superior accuracy over automated registration. It allowed repeat registration without repeating radiation during long spine segment instrumentations. More studies are needed to clarify both practical and clinical application of this method.
- 1 Castro Castro J, Rodino Padín J, Pinzón Millán A, Agulleiro Díaz JP, Villa Fernández JM, Pastor Zapata A. [Posterior lumbar fusion using the O-arm surgical imaging system: initial experience]. Neurocirugia (Astur) 2013; 24 (1) 1-8
- 2 Waschke A, Walter J, Duenisch P, Reichart R, Kalff R, Ewald C. CT-navigation versus fluoroscopy-guided placement of pedicle screws at the thoracolumbar spine: single center experience of 4,500 screws. Eur Spine J 2013; 22 (3) 654-660
- 3 Allam Y, Silbermann J, Riese F, Greiner-Perth R. Computer tomography assessment of pedicle screw placement in thoracic spine: comparison between free hand and a generic 3D-based navigation techniques. Eur Spine J 2013; 22 (3) 648-653
- 4 Lee MH, Lin MH, Weng HH , et al. Feasibility of intra-operative computed tomography navigation system for pedicle screw insertion of the thoraco-lumbar spine. J Spinal Disord Tech 2012;
- 5 Van de Kelft E, Costa F, Van der Planken D, Schils F. A prospective multicenter registry on the accuracy of pedicle screw placement in the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral levels with the use of the O-arm imaging system and StealthStation Navigation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2012; 37 (25) E1580-E1587
- 6 Bandela JR, Jacob RP, Arreola M, Griglock TM, Bova F, Yang M. Use of CT-based intraoperative spinal navigation: management of radiation exposure to operator, staff, and patients. World Neurosurg 2013; 79 (2) 390-394
- 7 Nottmeier EW, Bowman C, Nelson KL. Surgeon radiation exposure in cone beam computed tomography-based, image-guided spinal surgery. Int J Med Robot 2012; 8 (2) 196-200
- 8 Smith HE, Welsch MD, Sasso RC, Vaccaro AR. Comparison of radiation exposure in lumbar pedicle screw placement with fluoroscopy vs computer-assisted image guidance with intraoperative three-dimensional imaging. J Spinal Cord Med 2008; 31 (5) 532-537
- 9 Lange J, Karellas A, Street J , et al. Estimating the effective radiation dose imparted to patients by intraoperative cone-beam computed tomography in thoracolumbar spinal surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2013; 38 (5) E306-E312
- 10 Sun Y, Luebbers HT, Agbaje JO , et al. Validation of anatomical landmarks-based registration for image-guided surgery: an in-vitro study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2013; 41 (6) 522-526
- 11 Wang M, Song Z. Optimal number and distribution of points selected on the vertebra for surface matching in CT-based spinal navigation. Comput Aided Surg 2013; 18 (3–4) 93-100
- 12 Gertzbein SD, Robbins SE. Accuracy of pedicular screw placement in vivo. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1990; 15 (1) 11-14
- 13 Herring JL, Dawant BM, Maurer Jr CR, Muratore DM, Galloway RL, Fitzpatrick JM. Surface-based registration of CT images to physical space for image-guided surgery of the spine: a sensitivity study. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1998; 17 (5) 743-752
- 14 Tamura Y, Sugano N, Sasama T , et al. Surface-based registration accuracy of CT-based image-guided spine surgery. Eur Spine J 2005; 14 (3) 291-297
- 15 Glossop ND, Hu RW, Randle JA. Computer-aided pedicle screw placement using frameless stereotaxis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1996; 21 (17) 2026-2034
- 16 Ling JM, Dinesh SK, Pang BC , et al. Routine spinal navigation for thoraco-lumbar pedicle screw insertion using the O-arm three-dimensional imaging system improves placement accuracy. J Clin Neurosci 2014; 21 (3) 493-498
- 17 Winkler D, Vitzthum HE, Seifert V. Spinal markers: a new method for increasing accuracy in spinal navigation. Comput Aided Surg 1999; 4 (2) 101-104
- 18 Haberland N, Ebmeier K, Grunewald JP , et al. Incorporation of intraoperative computerized tomography in a newly developed spinal navigation technique. Computer Aided Surgery 2000; 5 (1) 18-27
- 19 Bredow J, Oppermann J, Kraus B , et al. The accuracy of 3D fluoroscopy-navigated screw insertion in the upper and subaxial cervical spine. Eur Spine J 2015; 24 (12) 2967-2976
- 20 Bydon M, Xu R, Amin AG , et al. Safety and efficacy of pedicle screw placement using intraoperative computed tomography: consecutive series of 1148 pedicle screws. J Neurosurg Spine 2014; 21 (3) 320-328
- 21 Srinivasan D, Than KD, Wang AC , et al. Radiation safety and spine surgery: systematic review of exposure limits and methods to minimize radiation exposure. World Neurosurg 2014; 82 (6) 1337-1343
- 22 Mountford PJ, Temperton DH. Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) 1990. Eur J Nucl Med 1992; 19 (2) 77-79
- 23 Mroz TE, Abdullah KG, Steinmetz MP, Klineberg EO, Lieberman IH. Radiation exposure to the surgeon during percutaneous pedicle screw placement. J Spinal Disord Tech 2011; 24 (4) 264-267
- 24 Baskar R. Emerging role of radiation induced bystander effects: cell communications and carcinogenesis. Genome Integr 2010; 1 (1) 13
- 25 Kim TT, Drazin D, Shweikeh F, Pashman R, Johnson JP. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of minimally invasive percutaneous pedicle screw placement with intraoperative CT (O-arm) image guidance navigation. Neurosurg Focus 2014; 36 (3) E1