Indian Journal of Neurotrauma 2016; 13(03): 131-141
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1586218
Original Article
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.

Prognostic Predictors of Decompressive Craniectomy in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Clinical Experience of 128 Cases

Pratap Chandra Nath
1   Department of Neurosurgery, SCB Medical College, Cuttack, Odisha, India
,
Manmath Kumar Dhir
1   Department of Neurosurgery, SCB Medical College, Cuttack, Odisha, India
,
Sanjib Mishra
1   Department of Neurosurgery, SCB Medical College, Cuttack, Odisha, India
,
Sudhansu Sekhar Mishra
2   Department of Neurosurgery, VSS Medical College, Burla, Sambalpur, Odisha, India
,
Srikant Das
2   Department of Neurosurgery, VSS Medical College, Burla, Sambalpur, Odisha, India
,
Rama Chandra Deo
1   Department of Neurosurgery, SCB Medical College, Cuttack, Odisha, India
,
Somnath Prasad Jena
1   Department of Neurosurgery, SCB Medical College, Cuttack, Odisha, India
,
Soubhagya Ranjan Tripathy
1   Department of Neurosurgery, SCB Medical College, Cuttack, Odisha, India
,
Sitansu Kumar Rout
1   Department of Neurosurgery, SCB Medical College, Cuttack, Odisha, India
,
Bikash Ranjan Behera
1   Department of Neurosurgery, SCB Medical College, Cuttack, Odisha, India
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

22 March 2016

21 June 2016

Publication Date:
10 August 2016 (online)

Abstract

Objectives The objective of this study was to analyze different parameters such as clinicoradiological presentation, surgical outcome, and factors associated with prognosis of traumatic brain injury patients undergoing decompressive craniectomy (DC).

Materials and Methods This observational study was done on all the cases of DC undertaken in our hospital during July 2013 to June 2015. In all cases, the age, sex, mode of injury, severity of injury, associated injuries, indications, computed tomography (CT) finding, complications, and outcomes in the form of morbidity and mortality were analyzed.

Results Out of all head injury patients admitted, only 3.036% underwent DC. The most common age group affected was 19 to 40 years (n = 49; 43.75%; p-value < 0.001). Male to female ratio was 3.8:1; 66.07% presented with Glasgow coma scale (GCS) score ≤ 8. Pupillary abnormality was found in 34 (30.35%) patients. ASDH was the most common (n = 97; 86.66%) CT finding. Road traffic accident (RTA) was the most common mode of injury found in 69.64% of patients. Aspiration pneumonia and ventilator-associated pneumonia were the most common nonneurosurgical complication found in 14.28% of patients. Total number of deaths was 30 (26.78%). On analysis, patients with low admission GCS, pupillary dilatation, trauma due to RTA, associated injury, and aspiration pneumonia show high mortality (p < 0.05). Eighty-two (73.21%) patients survived and 54 (48.21%) patients discharged with good neurological condition.

Conclusion DC yields good results in traumatic brain injury. GCS score < 8, associated subarachnoid hemorrhage, midline shift, intraoperative brain bulge, associated chest injury and long bone fracture, cerebral infraction, old age > 40 years, male sex, alcoholics, pupillary dilation, and aspiration pneumonia are the independent factors for increased mortality and disability.

 
  • References

  • 1 Chibbaro S, Tacconi L. Role of decompressive craniectomy in the management of severe head injury with refractory cerebral edema and intractable intracranial pressure. Our experience with 48 cases. Surg Neurol 2007; 68 (6) 632-638
  • 2 Martins ET, Linhares MN, Sousa DS , et al. Mortality in severe traumatic brain injury: a multivariated analysis of 748 Brazilian patients from Florianópolis city. J Trauma 2009; 67 (1) 85-90
  • 3 Hyder AA, Aggarwal A. The increasing burden of injuries in Eastern Europe and Eurasia: making the case for safety investments. Health Policy 2009; 89 (1) 1-13
  • 4 Kunze E, Meixensberger J, Janka M, Sörensen N, Roosen K. Decompressive craniectomy in patients with uncontrollable intracranial hypertension. Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien) 1998; 71 (Supplement): 16-18
  • 5 Cooper DJ, Rosenfeld JV, Murray L , et al; DECRA Trial Investigators; Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group. Decompressive craniectomy in diffuse traumatic brain injury. N Engl J Med 2011; 364 (16) 1493-1502
  • 6 Aarabi B, Hesdorffer DC, Ahn ES, Aresco C, Scalea TM, Eisenberg HM. Outcome following decompressive craniectomy for malignant swelling due to severe head injury. J Neurosurg 2006; 104 (4) 469-479
  • 7 Guerra WK, Gaab MR, Dietz H, Mueller JU, Piek J, Fritsch MJ. Surgical decompression for traumatic brain swelling: indications and results. J Neurosurg 1999; 90 (2) 187-196
  • 8 Huang AP, Tu YK, Tsai YH , et al. Decompressive craniectomy as the primary surgical intervention for hemorrhagic contusion. J Neurotrauma 2008; 25 (11) 1347-1354
  • 9 Kim KH. Predictors for functional recovery and mortality of surgically treated traumatic acute subdural hematomas in 256 patients. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2009; 45 (3) 143-150
  • 10 Hossain-Ibrahim MK, Tarnaris A, Wasserberg J. Decompressive craniectomy –friend or foe?. Trauma 2012; 14 (1) 16-38
  • 11 Alvis-Miranda H, Castellar-Leones SM, Moscote-Salazar LR. Decompressive craniectomy and traumatic brain injury: a review. Bull Emerg Trauma 2013; 1 (2) 60-68
  • 12 Nath PC, Mishra SS, Deo RC, Jena SP. Spectrum of pediatric head injury with management and outcome: a single tertiary care center study. Indian J Neurotrauma 2015; 12 (1) 10-18
  • 13 Skoglund TS, Eriksson-Ritzén C, Jensen C, Rydenhag B. Aspects on decompressive craniectomy in patients with traumatic head injuries. J Neurotrauma 2006; 23 (10) 1502-1509
  • 14 Sinha S, Raheja A, Garg M , et al. Decompressive craniectomy in traumatic brain injury: a single-center, multivariate analysis of 1,236 patients at a tertiary care hospital in India. Neurol India 2015; 63 (2) 175-183
  • 15 Qiu W, Guo C, Shen H , et al. Effects of unilateral decompressive craniectomy on patients with unilateral acute post-traumatic brain swelling after severe traumatic brain injury. Crit Care 2009; 13 (6) R185
  • 16 Haddad SH, Arabi YM. Critical care management of severe traumatic brain injury in adults. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2012; 20: 12
  • 17 Saul TG, Ducker TB. Effect of intracranial pressure monitoring and aggressive treatment on mortality in severe head injury. J Neurosurg 1982; 56 (4) 498-503
  • 18 Saul TG, Ducker TB. Intracranial pressure monitoring in patients with severe head injury. Am Surg 1982; 48 (9) 477-480
  • 19 Eisenberg HM, Frankowski RF, Contant CF, Marshall LF, Walker MD. High-dose barbiturate control of elevated intracranial pressure in patients with severe head injury. J Neurosurg 1988; 69 (1) 15-23
  • 20 Howells T, Elf K, Jones PA , et al. Pressure reactivity as a guide in the treatment of cerebral perfusion pressure in patients with brain trauma. J Neurosurg 2005; 102 (2) 311-317
  • 21 Bulger EM, Nathens AB, Rivara FP, Moore M, MacKenzie EJ, Jurkovich GJ ; Brain Trauma Foundation. Management of severe head injury: institutional variations in care and effect on outcome. Crit Care Med 2002; 30 (8) 1870-1876
  • 22 Mauritz W, Steltzer H, Bauer P, Dolanski-Aghamanoukjan L, Metnitz P. Monitoring of intracranial pressure in patients with severe traumatic brain injury: an Austrian prospective multicenter study. Intensive Care Med 2008; 34 (7) 1208-1215
  • 23 Stocchetti N, Penny KI, Dearden M , et al; European Brain Injury Consortium. Intensive care management of head-injured patients in Europe: a survey from the European brain injury consortium. Intensive Care Med 2001; 27 (2) 400-406
  • 24 Cremer OL, van Dijk GW, van Wensen E , et al. Effect of intracranial pressure monitoring and targeted intensive care on functional outcome after severe head injury. Crit Care Med 2005; 33 (10) 2207-2213
  • 25 Cremer OL. Does ICP monitoring make a difference in neurocritical care?. Eur J Anaesthesiol Suppl 2008; 42 (Suppl. 42) 87-93
  • 26 Shafi S, Diaz-Arrastia R, Madden C, Gentilello L. Intracranial pressure monitoring in brain-injured patients is associated with worsening of survival. J Trauma 2008; 64 (2) 335-340
  • 27 Alkhoury F, Kyriakides TC. Intracranial pressure monitoring in children with severe traumatic brain injury: National Trauma Data Bank-based review of outcomes. JAMA Surg 2014; 149 (6) 544-548
  • 28 Schneider GH, Bardt T, Lanksch WR, Unterberg A. Decompressive craniectomy following traumatic brain injury: ICP, CPP and neurological outcome. Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien) 2002; 81 (Supplement): 77-79
  • 29 Yang XF, Wen L, Shen F , et al. Surgical complications secondary to decompressive craniectomy in patients with a head injury: a series of 108 consecutive cases. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2008; 150 (12) 1241-1247 , discussion 1248
  • 30 Yang XJ, Hong GL, Su SB, Yang SY. Complications induced by decompressive craniectomies after traumatic brain injury. Chin J Traumatol 2003; 6 (2) 99-103
  • 31 Chen JW, Ruff RL, Eavey R, Wasterlain CG. Posttraumatic epilepsy and treatment. J Rehabil Res Dev 2009; 46 (6) 685-696