Neuropediatrics 2016; 47(05): 281-282
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1586224
Editorial Comment
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Of Phenobarbital for Neonatal Seizures: Response Rate and Refractoriness Predictors[*]

Georgia Ramantani
1   Division of Child Neurology, University Children's Hospital, Steinwiesstrasse 75, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland
2   Swiss Epilepsy Centre, Zurich, Switzerland
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
01 August 2016 (online)

Neonatal seizures constitute the most common and grave manifestation of neurologic dysfunction in the first weeks of life, reflecting a wide range of pre-, peri- or postnatal disorders of the central nervous system. The rapid developments in neonatal care in the past decades have facilitated a decrease in mortality, particularly in premature neonates, and at the same time, altered the scope of insults to which the immature brain is exposed. This has steered a shift from mortality to morbidity for neonates with seizures, since surviving neonates have an increased risk for postneonatal epilepsy and long-term neurodevelopmental disability.[1] [2] [3] [4] Neonatal seizures are acute symptomatic events, commonly triggered by hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE), stroke, or infection, and are only rarely associated with epilepsy per se. However, there is a growing body of evidence supporting that seizures themselves are aggravating brain damage, particularly in HIE,[5] [6] and therefore require treatment. The detection of seizures in neonates based on clinical presentation alone is hampered by the variability of their clinical expression, together with the high rate of electrographic-only seizures. The widespread use of continuous electroencephalography (EEG) or amplitude-integrated (a) EEG in the past years has facilitated a decrease in the latency to diagnosis and initiate treatment.[7]

Despite the urgent need for an effective as well as age-specific treatment for neonates, no clearly defined and evidence-based recommendations are currently available, as emphasized in the World Health Organization Guidelines.[8] The avalanche of antiepileptic drug (AED) development for older children and adults witnessed in the past decades had no (or little) impact on the prevalent management strategies for this most vulnerable age group.[9] Recent surveys indicate that phenobarbital remains the AED of choice among both neonatologists and child neurologists,[10] [11] [12] although seizure control is reportedly achieved in less than half of the cases, with an even lower efficacy regarding electrographic seizures.[13] [14] [15] Phenobarbital, chosen mainly due to extensive vast clinical experience as well as its inclusion in randomized controlled studies, has been shown to increase electroclinical dissociation,[14] thus providing false reassurance, unless EEG monitoring is used. Most importantly, there is evidence that phenobarbital itself may cause neurodevelopmental impairment and increase neuronal apoptosis.[16] In the meantime, several newer AEDs have been applied to the treatment of neonatal seizures,[17] though data from randomized controlled trials is still missing. Booth and Evans state in their Cochrane review regarding the treatment of neonatal seizures that “there is little evidence from randomized controlled trials to support the use of any of the anticonvulsants currently used in the neonatal period”.[18]

In this issue of Neuropediatrics, Spagnoli et al[19] bring this old drug, phenobarbital, back to the spotlight. In a retrospectively studied cohort of 91 neonates presenting with seizures to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), the authors have quantified the response rate to phenobarbital and identified predictors of lack of efficacy. Interestingly, phenobarbital response rates of 63% were higher than in past studies, most probably due to the exclusion of neonates with status epilepticus, previously highlighted as a predictor of refractoriness by the very same study group.[3] In this study, abnormal EEG background activity and the presence of electrographic-only seizures in neonates have been confirmed as adverse outcome predictors.

Poor response to AEDs has been identified as a predictor of adverse outcomes, particularly of postneonatal epilepsy in several studies.[2] [15] [20] The role of abnormal background EEG activity as a robust indicator of outcome following neonatal seizures has been recognized before, in contrast to the presence of isolated sharp waves.[21] In particular, the presence of an abnormal background EEG activity has been associated with the lack of response to phenobarbital,[13] [14] whereas responders presented with normal or mildly abnormal EEG background.[22] On the contrary, the identification of electrographic-only seizures in neonates as an adverse outcome predictor is particularly alarming, as it exposes a potential treatment gap and its dire consequences. At this time of ongoing debate regarding the treatment of electrographic-only seizures,[11] [23] this finding, together with the indication of adverse neurological outcomes in neonates with electrographic-only seizures[24] underlines the necessity for continuous EEG surveillance in the NICU to timely detect neonatal seizures and initiate AED administration. Although randomized controlled trials and large longitudinal cohort studies are a prerequisite for true progress in neonatal seizure management, optimizing seizure identification by the implementation of continuous EEG monitoring in itself may have the potential to improve outcomes.

* This article is an editorial on “Phenobarbital for neonatal seizures: Response rate and predictors of refractoriness” by Spagnoli et al (Neuropediatrics 2016;47(5):318–326).


 
  • References

  • 1 Glass HC, Shellhaas RA, Wusthoff CJ , et al; Neonatal Seizure Registry Study Group. Contemporary profile of seizures in neonates: a prospective cohort study. J Pediatr 2016; 174: 98-103.e1
  • 2 Ronen GM, Buckley D, Penney S, Streiner DL. Long-term prognosis in children with neonatal seizures: a population-based study. Neurology 2007; 69 (19) 1816-1822
  • 3 Pisani F, Cerminara C, Fusco C, Sisti L. Neonatal status epilepticus vs recurrent neonatal seizures: clinical findings and outcome. Neurology 2007; 69 (23) 2177-2185
  • 4 Ramantani G. Neonatal epilepsy and underlying aetiology: to what extent do seizures and EEG abnormalities influence outcome?. Epileptic Disord 2013; 15 (4) 365-375
  • 5 Miller SP, Weiss J, Barnwell A , et al. Seizure-associated brain injury in term newborns with perinatal asphyxia. Neurology 2002; 58 (4) 542-548
  • 6 Wirrell EC, Armstrong EA, Osman LD, Yager JY. Prolonged seizures exacerbate perinatal hypoxic-ischemic brain damage. Pediatr Res 2001; 50 (4) 445-454
  • 7 Shellhaas RA, Barks AK. Impact of amplitude-integrated electroencephalograms on clinical care for neonates with seizures. Pediatr Neurol 2012; 46 (1) 32-35
  • 8 World Health Organization. Guidelines on Neonatal Seizures. Geneva: 2011
  • 9 Pressler RM, Mangum B. Newly emerging therapies for neonatal seizures. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2013; 18 (4) 216-223
  • 10 Blume HK, Garrison MM, Christakis DA. Neonatal seizures: treatment and treatment variability in 31 United States pediatric hospitals. J Child Neurol 2009; 24 (2) 148-154
  • 11 van Rooij LGM, Hellström-Westas L, de Vries LS. Treatment of neonatal seizures. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2013; 18 (4) 209-215
  • 12 Clancy RR. Summary proceedings from the neurology group on neonatal seizures. Pediatrics 2006; 117 (3 Pt 2): S23-S27
  • 13 Boylan GB, Rennie JM, Chorley G , et al. Second-line anticonvulsant treatment of neonatal seizures: a video-EEG monitoring study. Neurology 2004; 62 (3) 486-488
  • 14 Boylan GB, Rennie JM, Pressler RM, Wilson G, Morton M, Binnie CD. Phenobarbitone, neonatal seizures, and video-EEG. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2002; 86 (3) F165-F170
  • 15 Painter MJ, Scher MS, Stein AD , et al. Phenobarbital compared with phenytoin for the treatment of neonatal seizures. N Engl J Med 1999; 341 (7) 485-489
  • 16 Bittigau P, Sifringer M, Genz K , et al. Antiepileptic drugs and apoptotic neurodegeneration in the developing brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002; 99 (23) 15089-15094
  • 17 Ramantani G, Ikonomidou C, Walter B, Rating D, Dinger J. Levetiracetam: safety and efficacy in neonatal seizures. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 2011; 15 (1) 1-7
  • 18 Booth D, Evans DJ. Anticonvulsants for neonates with seizures. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004; (4) CD004218
  • 19 Spagnoli C, Seri S, Pavlidis E, Mazzotta S, Pelosi A, Pisani F. Phenobarbital for neonatal seizures: response rate and predictors of refractoriness (epub ahead of print). Neuropediatrics 2016; 47 (5) 318-326
  • 20 Pisani F, Piccolo B, Cantalupo G , et al. Neonatal seizures and postneonatal epilepsy: a 7-y follow-up study. Pediatr Res 2012; 72 (2) 186-193
  • 21 Rowe JC, Holmes GL, Hafford J , et al. Prognostic value of the electroencephalogram in term and preterm infants following neonatal seizures. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1985; 60 (3) 183-196
  • 22 Connell J, Oozeer R, de Vries L, Dubowitz LM, Dubowitz V. Clinical and EEG response to anticonvulsants in neonatal seizures. Arch Dis Child 1989; 64 (4 Spec No): 459-464
  • 23 Silverstein FS, Jensen FE, Inder T, Hellstrom-Westas L, Hirtz D, Ferriero DM. Improving the treatment of neonatal seizures: National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke workshop report. J Pediatr 2008; 153 (1) 12-15
  • 24 McBride MC, Laroia N, Guillet R. Electrographic seizures in neonates correlate with poor neurodevelopmental outcome. Neurology 2000; 55 (4) 506-513