J Neurol Surg Rep 2016; 77(03): e121-e127
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1588060
Case Report
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Pathological and Topographical Classification of Craniopharyngiomas: A Literature Review

James Lubuulwa
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
,
Ting Lei
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

13 April 2016

26 July 2016

Publication Date:
22 August 2016 (online)

Abstract

Craniopharyngiomas (CPs) are clinically relevant tumors of the sellar region and are associated with high morbidity and occasional mortality. There are two different subtypes of CPs that differ clinically and pathologically: adamantinomatous CP and papillary CP. The differential diagnosis is still challenging even with developments in preoperative imaging as several tumors of the sellar/parasellar region share a continuum of clinical characteristics and imaging similarities. Several topographical classifications of CPs have been mentioned in literature, but to date, there has not been a consensus on a standard reference classification system and there is need to a develop such a model.

 
  • References

  • 1 Hoffman HJ. Surgical management of craniopharyngioma. Pediatr Neurosurg 1994; 21 (Suppl. 01) 44-49
  • 2 Bunin GR, Surawicz TS, Witman PA, Preston-Martin S, Davis F, Bruner JM. The descriptive epidemiology of craniopharyngioma. Neurosurg Focus 1997; 3 (6) e1
  • 3 Ortega-Porcayo LA, Ponce-Gómez JA, Martínez-Moreno M, Portocarrero-Ortíz L, Tena-Suck ML, Gómez-Amador JL. Primary ectopic frontotemporal craniopharyngioma. Int J Surg Case Rep 2015; 9: 57-60
  • 4 Bosnjak R, Benedicic M, Vittori A. Early outcome in endoscopic extended endonasal approach for removal of supradiaphragmatic craniopharyngiomas: a case series and a comprehensive review. Radiol Oncol 2013; 47 (3) 266-279
  • 5 Komotar RJ, Starke RM, Raper DM, Anand VK, Schwartz TH. Endoscopic endonasal compared with microscopic transsphenoidal and open transcranial resection of craniopharyngiomas. World Neurosurg 2012; 77 (2) 329-341
  • 6 Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD , et al. The 2007 WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system. Acta Neuropathol 2007; 114 (2) 97-109
  • 7 Wang W, Chen XD, Bai HM , et al. Malignant transformation of craniopharyngioma with detailed follow-up. Neuropathology 2015; 35 (1) 50-55
  • 8 Ishida M, Hotta M, Tsukamura A , et al. Malignant transformation in craniopharyngioma after radiation therapy: a case report and review of the literature. Clin Neuropathol 2010; 29 (1) 2-8
  • 9 Lauriola L, Doglietto F, Novello M , et al. De novo malignant craniopharyngioma: case report and literature review. J Neurooncol 2011; 103 (2) 381-386
  • 10 Coppens JR, Couldwell WT. Staged use of the transsphenoidal approach to resect superior third ventricular craniopharyngiomas. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2010; 53 (1) 40-43
  • 11 Wilson DA, Duong H, Teo C, Kelly DF. The supraorbital endoscopic approach for tumors. World Neurosurg 2014; 82 (6, Suppl): S72-S80
  • 12 Gu Y, Zhang X, Hu F , et al. Suprachiasmatic translamina terminalis corridor used in endoscopic endonasal approach for resecting third ventricular craniopharyngioma. J Neurosurg 2015; 122 (5) 1166-1172
  • 13 Takano S, Akutsu H, Mizumoto M, Yamamoto T, Tsuboi K, Matsumura A. Neuroendoscopy followed by radiotherapy in cystic craniopharyngiomas–a long-term follow-up. World Neurosurg 2015; 84 (5) 1305-1315.e1-2
  • 14 Lee CC, Yang HC, Chen CJ , et al. Gamma Knife surgery for craniopharyngioma: report on a 20-year experience. J Neurosurg 2014; 121 (Suppl): 167-178
  • 15 Liu A, Wang JM, Li GL , et al. Clinical and pathological analysis of benign brain tumors resected after Gamma Knife surgery. J Neurosurg 2014; 121 (Suppl): 179-187
  • 16 Shukla D. Transcortical transventricular endoscopic approach and Ommaya reservoir placement for cystic craniopharyngioma. Pediatr Neurosurg 2015; 50 (5) 291-294
  • 17 Yamini B, Narayanan M. Craniopharyngiomas: an update. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2006; 6 (Suppl. 09) S85-S92
  • 18 Uh J, Merchant TE, Li Y , et al. Effects of surgery and proton therapy on cerebral white matter of craniopharyngioma patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2015; 93 (1) 64-71
  • 19 Pulsifer MB, Sethi RV, Kuhlthau KA, MacDonald SM, Tarbell NJ, Yock TI. Early cognitive outcomes following proton radiation in pediatric patients with brain and central nervous system tumors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2015; 93 (2) 400-407
  • 20 Maarouf M, El Majdoub F, Fuetsch M , et al. Stereotactic intracavitary brachytherapy with P-32 for cystic craniopharyngiomas in children. Strahlenther Onkol 2016; 192 (3) 157-165
  • 21 Kickingereder P, Maarouf M, El Majdoub F , et al. Intracavitary brachytherapy using stereotactically applied phosphorus-32 colloid for treatment of cystic craniopharyngiomas in 53 patients. J Neurooncol 2012; 109 (2) 365-374
  • 22 Martinez-Barbera JP. 60 years of neuroendocrinology: biology of human craniopharyngioma: lessons from mouse models. J Endocrinol 2015; 226 (2) T161-T172
  • 23 Esheba GE, Hassan AA. Comparative immunohistochemical expression of β-catenin, EGFR, ErbB2, and p63 in adamantinomatous and papillary craniopharyngiomas. J Egypt Natl Canc Inst 2015; 27 (3) 139-145
  • 24 Hussain I, Eloy JA, Carmel PW, Liu JK. Molecular oncogenesis of craniopharyngioma: current and future strategies for the development of targeted therapies. J Neurosurg 2013; 119 (1) 106-112
  • 25 Scagliotti V, Avagliano L, Gualtieri A , et al. Histopathology and molecular characterisation of intrauterine-diagnosed congenital craniopharyngioma. Pituitary 2016; 19 (1) 50-56
  • 26 Larkin SJ, Ansorge O. Pathology and pathogenesis of craniopharyngiomas. Pituitary 2013; 16 (1) 9-17
  • 27 Müller HL. Craniopharyngioma. Endocr Rev 2014; 35 (3) 513-543
  • 28 Crotty TB, Scheithauer BW, Young Jr WF , et al. Papillary craniopharyngioma: a clinicopathological study of 48 cases. J Neurosurg 1995; 83 (2) 206-214
  • 29 Sohn CH, Baik SK, Kim SP, Kim IM, Sevick RJ. Craniopharyngioma in the temporal lobe: a case report. Korean J Radiol 2004; 5 (1) 72-74
  • 30 Nourbakhsh A, Brown B, Vannemreddy P, Lian T, Nanda A, Guthikonda B. Extracranial infrasellar ectopic craniopharyngioma: a case report and review of the literature. Skull Base 2010; 20 (6) 475-480
  • 31 Link MJ, Driscoll CL, Giannini C. Isolated, giant cerebellopontine angle craniopharyngioma in a patient with Gardner syndrome: case report. Neurosurgery 2002; 51 (1) 221-225 , discussion 225–226
  • 32 Jiang RS, Wu CY, Jan YJ, Hsu CY. Primary ethmoid sinus craniopharyngioma: a case report. J Laryngol Otol 1998; 112 (4) 403-405
  • 33 Lee YH, Kim SD, Lim DJ, Park JY, Chung YG, Kim YS. Isolated petroclival craniopharyngioma with aggressive skull base destruction. Yonsei Med J 2009; 50 (5) 729-731
  • 34 Jurkiewicz E, Bekiesińska-Figatowska M, Duczkowski M , et al. Antenatal diagnosis of the congenital craniopharyngioma. Pol J Radiol 2010; 75 (1) 98-102
  • 35 Lonjon M, Dran G, Casagrande F, Vandenbos F, Mas JC, Richelme C. Prenatal diagnosis of a craniopharyngioma: a new case with radical surgery and review. Childs Nerv Syst 2005; 21 (3) 177-180
  • 36 Joó JG, Rigó Jr J, Sápi Z, Timár B. Foetal craniopharyngioma diagnosed by prenatal ultrasonography and confirmed by histopathological examination. Prenat Diagn 2009; 29 (2) 160-163
  • 37 Kostadinov S, Hanley CL, Lertsburapa T, O'Brien B, He M. Fetal craniopharyngioma: management, postmortem diagnosis, and literature review of an intracranial tumor detected in utero. Pediatr Dev Pathol 2014; 17 (5) 409-412
  • 38 Pascual JM, Prieto R, Castro-Dufourny I, Carrasco R, Strauss S, Barrios L. Development of intracranial approaches for craniopharyngiomas: an analysis of the first 160 historical procedures. Neurosurg Focus 2014; 36 (4) E13
  • 39 Pascual JM, González-Llanos F, Barrios L, Roda JM. Intraventricular craniopharyngiomas: topographical classification and surgical approach selection based on an extensive overview. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2004; 146 (8) 785-802
  • 40 Fukushima T, Hirakawa K, Kimura M, Tomonaga M. Intraventricular craniopharyngioma: its characteristics in magnetic resonance imaging and successful total removal. Surg Neurol 1990; 33 (1) 22-27
  • 41 Davies MJ, King TT, Metcalfe KA, Monson JP. Intraventricular craniopharyngioma: a long-term follow-up of six cases. Br J Neurosurg 1997; 11 (6) 533-541
  • 42 Jeswani S, Nuño M, Wu A , et al. Comparative analysis of outcomes following craniotomy and expanded endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal resection of craniopharyngioma and related tumors: a single-institution study. J Neurosurg 2016; 124 (3) 627-638
  • 43 Kasliwal MK, Dua SG, Harbhajanka A, Nag S, Jhaveri MD, Moftakhar R. Intrasphenoidal Rathke's cleft cyst. J Clin Neurosci 2015; 22 (10) 1678-1682
  • 44 Choi SH, Kwon BJ, Na DG, Kim JH, Han MH, Chang KH. Pituitary adenoma, craniopharyngioma, and Rathke cleft cyst involving both intrasellar and suprasellar regions: differentiation using MRI. Clin Radiol 2007; 62 (5) 453-462
  • 45 Leuthardt EC, Lim CC, Shah MN , et al. Use of movable high-field-strength intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging with awake craniotomies for resection of gliomas: preliminary experience. Neurosurgery 2011; 69 (1) 194-205 , discussion 205–206
  • 46 Lu JF, Zhang J, Wu JS , et al. Awake craniotomy and intraoperative language cortical mapping for eloquent cerebral glioma resection: preliminary clinical practice in 3.0 T intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging integrated surgical suite [in Chinese]. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi 2011; 49 (8) 693-698
  • 47 Nimsky C, Ganslandt O, von Keller B, Fahlbusch R. Preliminary experience in glioma surgery with intraoperative high-field MRI. Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien) 2003; 88: 21-29
  • 48 Hölscher T, Draganski B, Postert T, Bogdahn U, Wilkening W. Brain perfusion imaging of a craniopharyngioma by transcranial duplex sonography. J Neuroimaging 2003; 13 (4) 303-306
  • 49 Xin W, Rubin MA, McKeever PE. Differential expression of cytokeratins 8 and 20 distinguishes craniopharyngioma from Rathke cleft cyst. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2002; 126 (10) 1174-1178
  • 50 Kim JH, Paulus W, Heim S. BRAF V600E mutation is a useful marker for differentiating Rathke's cleft cyst with squamous metaplasia from papillary craniopharyngioma. J Neurooncol 2015; 123 (1) 189-191
  • 51 Nielsen EH, Feldt-Rasmussen U, Poulsgaard L , et al. Incidence of craniopharyngioma in Denmark (n = 189) and estimated world incidence of craniopharyngioma in children and adults. J Neurooncol 2011; 104 (3) 755-763
  • 52 Sorva R, Heiskanen O. Craniopharyngioma in Finland. A study of 123 cases. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1986; 81 (3–4) 85-89
  • 53 Sorva R, Jääskinen J, Heiskanen O, Perheentupa J. Postoperative computed tomographic control of 38 patients with craniopharyngioma. Surg Neurol 1988; 29 (2) 115-119
  • 54 Behari S, Banerji D, Mishra A , et al. Intrinsic third ventricular craniopharyngiomas: report on six cases and a review of the literature. Surg Neurol 2003; 60 (3) 245-252 , discussion 252–253
  • 55 Pascual JM, Prieto R, Mazzarello P. Sir Victor Horsley: pioneer craniopharyngioma surgeon. J Neurosurg 2015; 123 (1) 39-51
  • 56 Brastianos PK, Taylor-Weiner A, Manley PE , et al. Exome sequencing identifies BRAF mutations in papillary craniopharyngiomas. Nat Genet 2014; 46 (2) 161-165
  • 57 Yaşargil MG, Curcic M, Kis M, Siegenthaler G, Teddy PJ, Roth P. Total removal of craniopharyngiomas. Approaches and long-term results in 144 patients. J Neurosurg 1990; 73 (1) 3-11
  • 58 Samii M, Tatagiba M. Surgical management of craniopharyngiomas: a review. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 1997; 37 (2) 141-149
  • 59 Kassam AB, Gardner PA, Snyderman CH, Carrau RL, Mintz AH, Prevedello DM. Expanded endonasal approach, a fully endoscopic transnasal approach for the resection of midline suprasellar craniopharyngiomas: a new classification based on the infundibulum. J Neurosurg 2008; 108 (4) 715-728
  • 60 Qi S, Lu Y, Pan J, Zhang X, Long H, Fan J. Anatomic relations of the arachnoidea around the pituitary stalk: relevance for surgical removal of craniopharyngiomas. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2011; 153 (4) 785-796
  • 61 Fatemi N, Dusick JR, de Paiva Neto MA, Malkasian D, Kelly DF. Endonasal versus supraorbital keyhole removal of craniopharyngiomas and tuberculum sellae meningiomas. Neurosurgery 2009; 64 (5) (Suppl. 02) 269-284 , discussion 284–286
  • 62 Matsuo T, Kamada K, Izumo T, Nagata I. Indication and limitations of endoscopic extended transsphenoidal surgery for craniopharyngioma. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2014; 54 (12) 974-982