Synlett 2017; 28(02): 214-220
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1588600
letter
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Synthetic Study on Acremoxanthone A: Construction of Bicyclo [3.2.2]nonane CD Skeleton and Fusion of AB Rings

Yoichi Hirano
Department of Chemistry, Tokyo Institute of Technology, 2-12-1 O-okayama, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 152-8551, Japan   Email: ksuzuki@chem.titech.ac.jp
,
Kensei Tokudome
Department of Chemistry, Tokyo Institute of Technology, 2-12-1 O-okayama, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 152-8551, Japan   Email: ksuzuki@chem.titech.ac.jp
,
Hiroshi Takikawa
Department of Chemistry, Tokyo Institute of Technology, 2-12-1 O-okayama, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 152-8551, Japan   Email: ksuzuki@chem.titech.ac.jp
,
Keisuke Suzuki*
Department of Chemistry, Tokyo Institute of Technology, 2-12-1 O-okayama, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 152-8551, Japan   Email: ksuzuki@chem.titech.ac.jp
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 01 August 2016

Accepted after revision: 30 August 2016

Publication Date:
21 September 2016 (online)


Abstract

Toward the total synthesis of acremoxanthone A, a model study has revealed a convergent approach to construct the ABCDE ring system. The key steps include: (1) an effective construction of the bicyclo[3.2.2]nonane skeleton, (2) protocol for generating the bridgehead anion and trapping, and (3) 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition of a nitrile oxide to the internal alkene.

Supporting Information

 
  • References and Notes

    • 1a Isaka M, Palasarn S, Auncharoen P, Komwijit S, Jones EB. G. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009; 50: 284
    • 1b Meléndez-González C, Murià-González MJ, Anaya AL, Hernández-Bautista BE, Hernández-Ortega S, González MC, Glenn AE, Hanlin RT, Macías-Rubalcava ML. Chem. Biodiversity 2015; 12: 133
    • 1c Intaraudom C, Bunbamrung N, Dramae A, Boonyuen N, Komwijit S, Rachtawee P, Pittayakhajonwut P. Tetrahedron 2016; 72: 1415
    • 2a Tabata N, Suzumura Y, Tomoda H, Masuma R, Haneda K, Kishi M, Iwai Y, Ōmura S. J. Antibiot. 1993; 46: 749
    • 2b Tabata N, Tomoda H, Iwai Y, Ōmura S. J. Antibiot. 1996; 49: 267
    • 2c Chen G.-D, Chen Y, Gao H, Shen L.-Q, Wu Y, Li X.-X, Li Y, Guo L.-D, Cen Y.-Z, Yao X.-S. J. Nat. Prod. 2013; 76: 702
    • 3a Milat M.-L, Prangé T, Ducrot P.-H, Tabet J.-C, Einhorn J, Blein J.-P, Lallemand J.-Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992; 114: 1478
    • 3b Ducrot P.-H, Einhorn J, Kerhoas L, Lallemand J.-Y, Milat M.-L, Blein J.-P, Neuman A, Prangé T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996; 37: 3121
    • 4a Hertweck C. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009; 48: 4688
    • 4b Das A, Khosla C. Acc. Chem. Res. 2009; 42: 631
    • 4c Hertweck C, Luzhetskyy A, Rebets Y, Bechthold A. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2007; 24: 162
    • 4d Zhou H, Li T, Tang Y. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2010; 27: 839

      For other congeners, see:
    • 5a Ueda J, Takagi M, Shin-ya K. J. Antibiot. 2010; 63: 615
    • 5b Wu B, Wiese J, Wenzel-Storjohann A, Malien S, Schmaljohann R, Imhoff JF. Chem. Eur. J. 2016; 22: 7452

    • For a review, see:
    • 5c Masters K.-S, Bräse S. Chem. Rev. 2012; 112: 3717
    • 6a Duffault J.-M, Tellier F. Synth. Commun. 1998; 28: 2467
    • 6b Kramer CS, Nieger M, Bräse S. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2014; 2150
    • 6c Kramer CS, Bräse S. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2013; 9: 1414
    • 7a Yamashita Y, Hirano Y, Takada A, Takikawa H, Suzuki K. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013; 52: 6658
    • 7b Takahashi N, Kanayama T, Okuyama K, Kataoka H, Fukaya H, Suzuki K, Matsumoto T. Chem. Asian J. 2011; 6: 1752
    • 8a Stork G, Danishefsky S, Ohashi M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1967; 89: 5459
    • 8b Kashima C. Heterocycles 1979; 12: 1343
    • 8c Baraldi PG, Barco A, Benetti S, Pollini GP, Simoni D. Synthesis 1987; 857
    • 9a Martínez AG, Vilar ET, López JC, Alonso JM, Hanack M, Subramanian LR. Synthesis 1991; 353
    • 9b Ioannou S, Nicolaides AV. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009; 50: 6938
  • 10 For a review, see: Kraus GA, Hon Y.-S, Thomas PJ, Laramay S, Liras S, Hanson J. Chem. Rev. 1989; 89: 1591
    • 11a Bingham RC, Schleyer Pv. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1971; 93: 3189
    • 11b Gleicher GJ, Schleyer Pv. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1967; 89: 582
    • 11c Takeuchi K, Akiyama F, Ikai K, Shibata T, Kato M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1988; 29: 873
  • 12 Baraldi PG, Barco A, Benetti S, Pollini GP, Zanirato V. Tetrahedron Lett. 1984; 25: 4291
  • 13 Mukaiyama T, Matsuo J, Kitagawa H. Chem. Lett. 2000; 1250
    • 14a Kelly SA, Foricher Y, Mann J, Bentley JM. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2003; 1: 2865
    • 14b Foricher Y, Mann J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000; 41: 2007

    • For reviews, see:
    • 14c Dounay AB, Overman LE. Chem. Rev. 2003; 103: 2945
    • 14d Beletskaya IP, Cheprakov AV. Chem. Rev. 2000; 100: 3009
  • 15 Experimental Procedure for the Palladium-Catalyzed Conjugate Addition A mixture of enone 8 (4.82 g, 14.3 mmol), Pd(OAc)2 (641 mg, 2.86 mmol), Ph3P (3.00 g, 11.4 mmol), and i-Pr2NEt (29.9 mL, 171 mmol) in DMA (240 mL) was degassed by sonication under reduced pressure. After stirring for 3 h at 110 °C, the reaction was stopped by adding sat. aq NH4Cl, and the mixture was extracted with Et2O (4×). The combined organic extracts were washed with brine, dried (Na2SO4), and concentrated in vacuo. The residue was purified by flash column chromatography (silica gel, hexane–EtOAc = 9:1 to 8:1) to afford ketone 9 (2.51 g, 68%) and ketone 10 (608 mg, 17%) both as white solids. Rf = 0.43 (hexane–acetone = 4:1). mp 98–99 °C (Et2O–hexane, colorless plate). 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 1.42 (s, 3 H), 1.52 (s, 3 H), 1.92–2.01 (m, 1 H), 2.66–2.73 (m, 1 H), 2.67 (br d, J = 19.2 Hz), 2.76 (dd, 1 H, J = 19.2, 6.0 Hz), 3.19 (d, 1 H, J = 17.4 Hz), 3.23–3.32 (m, 1 H), 3.51 (d, 1 H, J = 17.4 Hz), 4.38 (dd, 1 H, J = 8.7, 6.9 Hz), 7.10–7.19 (m, 3 H), 7.19–7.25 (m, 1 H). 13C NMR (150 Hz, CDCl3): δ = 26.5, 27.5, 34.7, 38.3, 41.0, 44.3, 77.9, 84.5, 110.9, 126.8, 127.4, 129.6, 130.6, 132.4, 141.2, 210.0. IR (ATR): 2991, 2937, 1727, 1385, 1253, 1220, 1081, 987, 884, 756, 715 cm–1. HRMS (APCI): m/z calcd for C16H18NaO3 [M + Na]+: 281.1154; found: 281.1148.
  • 16 CCDC 1496235 (9) and 1496234 (10) contain the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. The data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/getstructures.
    • 17a Kim S, Lee S, Lee T, Ko H, Kim D. J. Org. Chem. 2006; 71: 8661
    • 17b van den Berg RJ. B. H. N, van den Elst H, Korevaar CG. N, Aerts JM. F. G, van der Marel GA, Overkleeft HS. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2011; 6685
  • 18 Toward the SN1-type reaction, triflate 19 appears to be more stable than the saturated scaffold B. Two C=C bonds in 19 may destabilize the bridgehead cation by the inductive electron-withdrawing (–I) effect (see ref. 11c).
    • 19a Lansbury PT, Sidler JD. Tetrahedron Lett. 1965; 6: 691
    • 19b Lansbury PT, Pattison VA, Sidler JD, Bieber JB. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1966; 88: 78
  • 20 Neumann H, Seebach D. Tetrahedron Lett. 1976; 45: 7347
  • 21 Zimmerman HE, Lapin YA, Nesterov EE, Sereda GA. J. Org. Chem. 2000; 65: 7740
  • 22 Due to the volatility of the protonated compound 21, the D2O quenching is not reliable.
  • 23 Kitahara K, Toma T, Shimokawa J, Fukuyama T. Org. Lett. 2008; 10: 2259
  • 24 In the original report (ref. 22), a TBS group was employed for O-protecting hydroxylamine. However, our preliminary studies suggested that the O-TBS group was labile under conditions using organolithium reagents, and we used an O-allyl group instead.
  • 25 Gore MP, Gould SJ, Weller DD. J. Org. Chem. 1992; 57: 2774
    • 26a Cooley JH, Misra BN, Throckmorton JR, Bills WD. J. Med. Chem. 1968; 11: 196
    • 26b Koyama J, Sugita T, Suzuta Y, Irie H. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1983; 31: 2601
  • 27 Experimental Procedure for the Nucleophilic Addition of Bridgehead Anion A flask was charged with t-BuLi (1.69 M in n-pentane, 479 μL, 810 μmol), to which a solution of iodide 2 (79.4 mg, 270 μmol, azeotropically dried with toluene) in THF (3.0 mL) was added at –78 °C. After stirring for 10 min at this temperature, a solution of aldehyde 23 (347 mg, 891 μmol, azeotropically dried with toluene) in THF (6.0 mL) was added. The reaction was allowed to warm gradually to 0 °C over 1.5 h. After stirring for 30 min at this temperature, the reaction was stopped by adding sat. aq NH4Cl, and the mixture was extracted with EtOAc (3×). The combined organic extracts were washed with brine, dried ­(Na2SO4), and concentrated in vacuo. The residue was purified by flash column chromatography (silica gel, hexane–toluene–acetone = 7:1:1) to afford alcohol 28 (121 mg, 80%) as colorless oil. Rf = 0.29 (hexane–EtOAc = 2:1). 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 2.33 (s, 3 H), 2.34 (br s, 1 H), 2.47 (s, 3 H), 2.55 (br d, 1 H, J = 17.1 Hz), 3.08 (br d, 1 H, J = 17.1 Hz), 3.75 (dd, 1 H, J = 6.6, 6.3 Hz), 3.78 (s, 3 H), 3.93 (br, 1 H), 4.13 (br, 1 H), 4.20 (br, 1 H), 4.62 (br, 1 H), 4.91–5.16 (m, 3 H), 5.40–5.53 (m, 1 H), 5.73 (d, 1 H, J = 8.0 Hz), 6.38 (dd, 1 H, J = 8.0, 6.3 Hz), 6.42 (d, 1 H, J = 8.1 Hz), 6.54 (dd, 1 H, J = 8.1, 6.6 Hz), 6.65 (s, 1 H), 6.90 (d, 1 H, J = 7.2 Hz), 6.93–7.04 (m, 2 H), 7.04–7.14 (m, 2 H), 7.40 (d, 2 H, J = 8.1 Hz), 7.87 (d, 2 H, J = 8.1 Hz). 13C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 21.7, 22.0, 34.6, 43.7, 46.2, 46.9, 55.9, 73.3, 78.5, 111.3, 117.9, 119.6, 120.7, 125.2, 126.2, 127.1, 129.6, 129.7, 130.1, 130.6 (2 C), 132.4, 132.5, 133.70, 133.72, 136.7, 139.0, 139.5, 142.9, 144.9, 158.5. IR (neat): 3542, 2937, 1355, 1303, 1167, 913, 730, 539, 505 cm–1. ESI-HRMS: m/z calcd for C33H36NO5S [M + H]+: 558.2309; found: 558.2302.
  • 28 Das B, Holla H, Mahender G, Banerjee J, Reddy MR. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004; 45: 7347
  • 29 Experimental Procedure for 1,3-Dipolar Cycloaddition To a solution of hemiacetal (Z)-30′ (8.2 mg, 23 μmol) in MeCN (0.5 mL) were added NaHCO3 (2.5 mg, 30 μmol) and PhI(OAc)2 (9.6 mg, 30 μmol) at 0 °C. After stirring for 16 h at room temperature, the reaction was stopped by adding sat. aq NH4Cl, and the mixture was extracted with EtOAc (3×). The combined organic extracts were washed with brine, dried (Na2SO4), and concentrated in vacuo. The residue was purified by PTLC (hexane–EtOAc = 1:1) to afford isoxazoline 31 (6.6 mg, 80%) as a white solid. Rf = 0.43 (hexane–EtOAc = 1:1). 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 2.46 (s, 3 H), 3.06 (d, 1 H, J = 18.0 Hz), 3.74 (dd, 1 H, J = 6.6, 1.2 Hz), 3.78 (d, 1 H, J = 18.0 Hz), 3.98 (s, 3 H), 4.21 (d, 1 H, J = 10.5 Hz), 5.20 (dd, 1 H, J = 10.5, 1.2 Hz), 5.63 (d, 1 H, J = 9.0 Hz), 6.58 (dd, 1 H, J = 9.0, 6.6 Hz), 7.04 (s, 1 H), 7.10–7.15 (m, 2 H), 7.17 (d, 1 H, J = 7.6 Hz), 7.18–7.23 (m, 1 H), 7.61 (s, 1 H). 13C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 22.0, 35.7, 45.6, 50.1, 56.3, 56.8, 82.0, 116.5, 117.4, 121.1, 126.4, 126.5, 127.5, 128.9, 131.98, 132.00, 135.3, 135.7, 136.5, 142.0, 150.2, 156.9, 197.4. IR (neat): 2924, 2852, 1687, 1602, 1311, 1066, 900, 753, 733 cm–1. ESI-HRMS: m/z calcd for C23H20NO3 [M + H]+: 358.1443; found: 358.1442.