Synlett 2017; 28(08): 929-933
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1588702
letter
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

5-Alkyl-8-hydroxyquinolines: Synthesis and Application in Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells

Victoria S. Manthou
a   Laboratory of Organic Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Panepistimiopolis, 15771 Athens, Greece   Email: vougiouk@chem.uoa.gr
,
Dorothea Perganti
b   Institute of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology NCSR ‘Demokritos’, 15310 Agia Paraskevi Attikis, Greece   Email: p.falaras@inn.demokritos.gr
,
Georgios Rotas
a   Laboratory of Organic Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Panepistimiopolis, 15771 Athens, Greece   Email: vougiouk@chem.uoa.gr
,
Polycarpos Falaras*
b   Institute of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology NCSR ‘Demokritos’, 15310 Agia Paraskevi Attikis, Greece   Email: p.falaras@inn.demokritos.gr
,
Georgios C. Vougioukalakis*
a   Laboratory of Organic Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Panepistimiopolis, 15771 Athens, Greece   Email: vougiouk@chem.uoa.gr
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 08 November 2016

Accepted after revision: 17 January 2017

Publication Date:
08 February 2017 (online)


Abstract

The use of co-adsorbents in dye-sensitized solar cells (DSCs) increases both the power-conversion efficiency and long-term stability of these devices. Co-adsorbents usually consist of a hydrophobic moiety attached on a carboxylic or phosphoric acid terminal anchoring group, which chemisorbs on the semiconductor surface. In this work, the synthesis of a new family of 8-quinolinol derivatives bearing alkyl chains of variable length at the 5-position is described and their comparative efficiency as effective bidentate co-adsorbents in DSCs is evaluated. The key step towards their straightforward modular synthesis is a Suzuki coupling between 5-chloro-8-methoxyquinoline and alkyltrifluoroborates. The new compounds showed better performance as co-adsorbents in terms of cell efficiency as compared to their alkylcarboxylic acid analogues, with the best results obtained from the derivative bearing the longer dodecyl alkyl chain.

Supporting Information

 
  • References and Notes

    • 1a Vougioukalakis GC, Philippopoulos AI, Stergiopoulos T, Falaras P. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2011; 255: 2602
    • 1b Hagfeldt A, Boschloo G, Sun L, Kloo L, Pettersson H. Chem. Rev. 2010; 110: 6595
    • 1c O’Regan B, Gratzel M. Nature (London, U.K.) 1991; 353: 737
  • 2 Mathew S, Yella A, Gao P, Humphry-Baker R, Curchod BF. E, Ashari-Astani N, Tavernelli I, Rothlisberger U, Nazeerudin MK, Grätzel M. Nat. Chem. 2014; 6: 242
    • 3a Vougioukalakis GC, Konstantakou M, Pefkianakis EK, Kabanakis AN, Stergiopoulos T, Kontos AG, Andreopoulou AK, Kallitsis JK, Falaras P. Asian J. Org. Chem. 2014; 3: 953
    • 3b Vougioukalakis GC, Stergiopoulos T, Kotos AG, Pefkianakis EK, Papadopoulos K, Falaras P. Dalton Trans. 2013; 42: 6582
    • 3c Anselmi C, Mosconi E, Pastore M, Ronca E, De Angelis F. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2012; 14: 15963
    • 3d Clifford JN, Martinez-Ferrero E, Viterisi A, Palomares E. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011; 40: 1635
    • 3e Yella A, Lee H.-W, Tsao HN, Yi C, Chandiran AK, Nazeeruddin MK, Diau EW.-G, Yeh C.-Y, Zakeeruddin SM, Grätzel M. Science 2011; 334: 629
    • 4a Rourke CO, Bowler DR. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2014; 26: 195302
    • 4b Wiberg J, Marinado T, Hagberg DP, Sun L, Hagfeldt A, Albinsson B. J. Phys. Chem. C 2009; 113: 3881
    • 5a Hou R, Yuan S, Ren X, Zhao Y, Wang Z, Zhang M, Li D, Shi L. Electrochim. Acta 2015; 154: 190
    • 5b Zhang L.-P, Jiang K.-J, Chen Q, Li G, Yang L.-M. RSC Adv. 2015; 5: 46206
    • 5c Michinobu T, Satoh N, Cai J, Li Y, Han L. J. Mater. Chem. C 2014; 2: 3367
  • 6 He H, Gurung A, Si L. Chem. Commun. 2012; 48: 5910
  • 7 Si L, He H, Zhu K. New J. Chem. 2014; 38: 1565
  • 8 Manthou VS, Pefkianakis EK, Falaras P, Vougioukalakis GC. ChemSusChem 2015; 8: 588
    • 9a Dong Y, Wei L, Fan R, Yang Y, Wang P. RSC Adv. 2016; 6: 39972
    • 9b Hou R, Yuan S, Ren X, Zhao Y, Wang Z, Zhang M, Li D, Shi L. Electrochim. Acta 2015; 154: 190
    • 10a Oliveri V, Vecchio G. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2016; 120: 252
    • 10b Prachayasittikul V, Prachayasittikul S, Ruchirawat S, Prachayasittikul V. Drug Des., Dev. Ther. 2013; 7: 1157
    • 10c Albrecht M, Fiege M, Osetska O. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2008; 252: 812
  • 11 Hojjatie M, Muralidharan S, Dietz ML, Freiser H. Synth. Commun. 1989; 19: 2273
  • 12 Spectroscopic Data for Compound 4 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 8.43 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1 Η), 7.45 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1 Η), 7.44 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1 Η), 6.94 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1 Η), 4.06 (s, 3 H), 3.07–3.04 (m, 2 H), 1.83–1.77 (m, 2 H), 1.45 (sext, J = 7.4 Hz, 2 Η), 0.96 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 3 Η). 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 161.94, 153.50, 139.52, 132.21, 124.63, 124.62, 121.72, 121.36, 106.80, 55.40, 38.33, 31.47, 22.07, 13.35. ESI-HRMS: m/z calcd for C14H17ClNO: 250.0999; found: 250.0994 [M + H]+.
  • 13 Spectroscopic Data for Compound 5 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 8.59 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1 H), 8.20 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 2 H), 8.02 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1 H), 7.57–7.41 (m, 4 H), 6.99 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1 H).
    • 14a Kovalev IS, Kopchuk DS, Zyryanov GV, Rusinov VL, Chupakhin ON, Charushin VN. Russ. Chem. Rev. 2015; 84: 1191
    • 14b Hintermann L, Schmitz M, Englert U. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007; 46: 5164
    • 14c Wolf C, Lerebours R. J. Org. Chem. 2003; 68: 7077
    • 14d Pinard E, Alanine A, Bourson A, Büttelmann B, Heitz M.-P, Mutel RG. V, Trube G, Wyler R. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2002; 12: 2615
    • 14e Gros P, Fort Y, Caubere P. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1997; 3597
    • 14f Mongin F, Fourquez J.-M, Rault S, Levacher V, Godard A, Trécourt F, Quéguiner G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995; 36: 8415
    • 15a Fleury-Brégeot N, Presset M, Beaumard F, Colombel V, Oehlrich D, Rombouts F, Molander GA. J. Org. Chem. 2012; 77: 10399
    • 15b Albrecht M, Blau O, Zauner J. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 1999; 3165
    • 15c Nakano Y, Imai D. Synthesis 1997; 1425
  • 16 Beesu M, Caruso G, Salyer AC. D, Khetani KK, Sil D, Weerasinghe M, Tanji H, Ohto U, Shimizu T, David SA. J. Med. Chem. 2015; 58: 7833
  • 17 Darses S, Genet J.-P. Chem. Rev. 2008; 108: 288
    • 18a Fleury-Brégeot N, Oehlrich D, Rombouts F, Molander GA. Org. Lett. 2013; 15: 1536
    • 18b Dreher SD, Lim S.-E, Sandrock DL, Molander GA. J. Org. Chem. 2009; 74: 3626
  • 19 Representative Synthetic Procedure for the Dodecyl Derivative 1c
    Potassium Dodecyltrifluoroborate (7c)
    Dry and degassed Et2O (20 mL) was added in flame-dried grinded magnesium turnings (300.0 mmol, 3.60 g, flame activated) under argon. Then, 1-bromododecane (50.0 mmol, 12.46 g) was added dropwise, resulting in a gentle refluxing mixture, and stirred for 1 h. The as-prepared Grignard reagent solution was added dropwise under Ar to a cooled (–78 °C), dry, and degassed THF (50 mL) solution of trimethyl borate (75 mmol, 7.79 g), and the mixture was stirred for 1 h at that temperature and at r.t. for another 1 h. After cooling to 0 °C, a 4.5 M aq KHF2 solution (205 mmol, 45.5 mL) was added dropwise, and the resulting mixture was stirred for 30 min. The solvents were evaporated, the residue was extracted with hot acetone (3 × 50 mL), and the combined extracts were filtered. The filtrate was condensed to minimum volume solution, the product precipitated out after addition of Et2O (30 mL), filtered, and dried at 45 °C in vacuo (2 × 10–3 mbar), furnishing pure 7c as a white powder (7.00 g, 50%). 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d 6): δ = 1.30–1.05 (m, 22 H), 0.88–0.82 (m, 3 H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO-d 6): δ = 33.13, 31.24, 29.44, 29.21, 29.15, 29.06, 28.98, 28.66, 25.62, 22.02, 13.88. 5-Dodecyl-8-methoxyquinoline (3c) A degassed mixture of 2 (3.07 mmol, 0.59 g), 7c (3.38 mmol, 934 mg), Na2CO3 (9.21 mmol, 0.98 g), Pd(OAc)2 (0.25 mmol, 0.06 g), and RuPhos (0.50 mmol, 0.23 g) in toluene–water (5:1, 15.3 mL) was stirred at 100 °C under argon for 24 h. After cooling to r.t., water (15 mL) was added, and the mixture was extracted with EtOAc (3 × 15 mL). The combined organic layers were dried (MgSO4) and the solvents evaporated. The residue was purified by column chromatography (EtOAc–PE = 1:1) yielding 3c as yellow oil (0.90 g, 90 %, Rf = 0.5). 1H NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 8.93 (dd, J = 4.2, 1.6 Hz, 1 H), 8.32 (dd, J = 8.6, 1.6 Hz, 1 H), 7.45 (dd, J = 8.6, 4.2 Hz, 1 H), 7.28 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1 H), 6.97 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1 H), 4.07 (s, 3 H), 2.99–2.92 (m, 2 H), 1.75–1.60 (m, 2 H), 1.45–1.25 (m, 20 H), 0.90–0.84 (m, 3 H). 13C NMR (50 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 153.82, 148.69, 140.59, 132.48, 130.73, 127.86, 126.07, 121.27, 107.12, 55.95, 32.03, 31.15, 29.76, 29.74, 29.64, 29.46, 22.80, 14.25. 5-Dodecyl-8-quinolinol (1c) A solution of methoxyquinoline 3c (2.75 mmol, 900 mg) in aq HBr (48%, 11.8 mL) was stirred at reflux for 22 h. After cooling to r.t., the mixture was washed with Et2O (30 mL), the organic washing was decanted, and the aqueous phase was basified with NaHCO3 (pH 8) and extracted with Et2O (3 × 30 mL). The combined organic phases were dried (MgSO4), the solvent was evaporated, and the residue was purified with column chromatography (EtOAc–PE = 1:9) affording 1c as pale yellow powder (373 mg, 43 %, Rf = 0.6). 1H NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 8.78 (dd, J = 4.2, 1.4 Hz, 1 H), 8.35 (dd, J = 8.5, 1.4 Hz, 1 H), 8.30 (br s, 1 H), 7.46 (dd, J = 8.5, 4.2 Hz, 1 H), 7.28 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1 H), 7.10 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1 H), 2.99–2.91 (m, 2 H), 1.74–1.60 (m, 2 H), 1.42–1.26 (m, 18 H), 0.91–0.85 (m, 3 H). 13C NMR (50 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 150.56, 147.33, 138.78, 132.95, 129.50, 127.11, 127.11, 121.38, 109.47, 32.07, 31.94, 31.40, 29.81, 29.78, 29.68, 29.50, 22.84, 14.27. ESI-HRMS: m/z calcd for C17H24NO: 314.2484; found: 314.2478 [M + H]+.