Synlett 2018; 29(08): 1092-1094
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1591530
letter
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Ambient-Pressure Asymmetric Preparation of S,S-DICHED, a C 2-Symmetrical Director for Matteson Reactions

Kevin Bojaryn
Institut für Organische Chemie, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Universitätsstraße 7, 45141 Essen, Germany   Email: Christoph.Hirschhaeuser@uni-due.de
,
Chris Hoffmann
Institut für Organische Chemie, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Universitätsstraße 7, 45141 Essen, Germany   Email: Christoph.Hirschhaeuser@uni-due.de
,
Felix R. Struth
Institut für Organische Chemie, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Universitätsstraße 7, 45141 Essen, Germany   Email: Christoph.Hirschhaeuser@uni-due.de
,
Institut für Organische Chemie, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Universitätsstraße 7, 45141 Essen, Germany   Email: Christoph.Hirschhaeuser@uni-due.de
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 15 November 2017

Accepted after revision: 19 December 2017

Publication Date:
19 January 2018 (online)


◊ These authors contributed equally to this work.

Abstract

A synthesis of S,S-DICHED (dicyclohexylethane-1,2-diol), a C 2-symmetrical chiral director for Matteson homologations, is described. It relies on the insertion of lithiated S-2-cyclohexyloxirane into cyclohexylboronic acid pinacol ester and proceeds in three linear steps from readily available starting materials. No step requires chromatography or any specialized equipment.

Supporting Information

 
  • References and Notes


    • Recent reviews:
    • 1a Matteson DS. J. Org. Chem. 2013; 78: 10009
    • 1b Thomas SP. French RM. Jheengut V. Aggarwal VK. Chem. Rec. 2009; 9: 24

    • Original articles:
    • 1c Matteson DS. Majumdar D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980; 102: 7588
    • 1d Matteson DS. Ray R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980; 102: 7590
    • 1e Tripathy PB. Matteson DS. Synthesis 1990; 200
    • 2a Hoffmann RW. Ditrich K. Köster G. Stürmer R. Chem. Ber. 1989; 122: 1783
    • 2b Sharpless KB. Amberg W. Bennani YL. Crispino GA. Hartung J. Jeong KS. Kwong HL. Morikawa K. Wang ZM. J. Org. Chem. 1992; 57: 2768
  • 3 Hiscox WC. Matteson DS. J. Org. Chem. 1996; 61: 8315
  • 4 Ref. 3 reports problems with overreduction when using the procedure described in ref. 2. Our attempts to run the procedure in ref. 3 on 0.5–2 g scales required some dilution, leading to mixtures of starting material and (partially) hydrogenated product. Ref. (3) also describes RhCl3 recovery.
    • 5a Vedrenne E. Wallner OA. Vitale M. Schmidt F. Aggarwal VK. Org. Lett. 2009; 11: 165

    • Also see:
    • 5b Alwedi E. Zakharov LN. Blakemore PR. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2014; 6643
  • 6 Huang K. Wang H. Stepanenko V. De Jesús M. Torruellas C. Correa W. Ortiz-Marciales M. J. Org. Chem. 2011; 76: 1883
  • 7 We initially thought that the 1,2-rearrangement/epoxide opening had to be facilitated by a Lewis acid, the role of which could be fulfilled by excess boronate. However, attempts to replace it with ZnCl2 or TMSCl (added after LiTMP) resulted in lower conversions of 5 and thus lower yields. The formation of an ate complex of type 10 after the 1,2-rearrangement would explain this observation if the rearrangement occurs as fast/faster than the formation of 9.
  • 8 Singh RP. Matteson DS. J. Org. Chem. 2000; 65: 6650
  • 9 Struth FR. Hirschhäuser C. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2016; 958
  • 10 Based on our previous studies (ref. 9) we expected a de of 80% for the homologation of 11 with LiCHX2 under the employed conditions. However, we did expect the de to increase again after substitution with vinyl Grignard (→ 12) due to the double stereodifferentiation discovered by Matteson for this type of chiral director (ref. 1e). See Supporting Information for further discussion.
  • 11 Matteson DS. Beedle EC. Kandil AA. J. Org. Chem. 1987; 52: 5034
  • 12 Procedure for the Preparation of SS -1 Immediately before the reaction, LiTMP was prepared in a separate flask by addition of n-BuLi (2 equiv, 1.6 M in hexanes) to a solution of dry tetramethylpiperidine (2 equiv) in dry THF (1 L/mol of LiTMP) at 0 °C. The LiTMP solution was stirred for 0.5 h at r.t., transferred into a dropping funnel and added dropwise to a solution of epoxide 5 (1 equiv) and boronate 6 (2 equiv) in THF (1 L/mol of 6) with cooling in an ice bath (0 °C). Afterwards the reaction mixture was stirred for 0.5 h at 0 °C and 1.5 h at 13–14 °C (p-xylene/dry ice bath). The reaction mixture was cooled to 0 °C before aq. NaOH (2 M, 3.5 equiv) and aq. H2O2 (30%, 10 equiv) were added simultaneously. After stirring for 30 min aq. Na2S2O5 (2 M) was added over the course of 15 min at the same temperature. Stirring was continued for 5 min before Et2O and H2O were added and the phases were separated. The aqueous layer was re-extracted with Et2O, and the combined organic layers were washed with sat. aq. NH4Cl, brine and aq. NaOH (1 M). The organic phase was dried over MgSO4, filtered, and the solvent was removed in vacuo to yield a yellow solid. Recrystallization from EtOH or chromatography on silica (CyHex/EtOAc, 9:1) yielded SS-1 in 55–60% yield. Rf = 0.28 (CyHex/EtOAc, 4:1). 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 3.45–3.25 (m, 2 H), 1.95–1.42 (m, 12 H), 1.34–0.95 (m, 10 H). 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 75.1, 40.4, 29.6, 28.2, 26.4, 26.2, 26.1. 1H NMR and 13C NMR data were consistent with those previously reported by: Scott MS. Lucas AC. Luckhurst CA. Prodger JC. Dixon DJ. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2006; 4: 1313