Minimally Invasive Direct Lateral Corpectomy of the Thoracolumbar Spine for Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression

Terence Tan; Jocelyn Chu; Christopher Thien; Yi Yuen Wang

doi:10.1055/s-0036-1592159

Journal of Neurological Surgery Part A: Central European Neurosurgery, Table of Contents

J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2017; 78(04): 358-367
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1592159

Original Article

Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Minimally Invasive Direct Lateral Corpectomy of the Thoracolumbar Spine for Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression

Authors

Terence Tan

¹Department of Neurosurgery, St. Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Jocelyn Chu

¹Department of Neurosurgery, St. Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Christopher Thien

¹Department of Neurosurgery, St. Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Yi Yuen Wang

¹Department of Neurosurgery, St. Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Abstract

Objectives To evaluate the feasibility, safety, clinical, and radiologic outcomes of a minimally invasive direct lateral-approach corpectomy (MIDLaC) for decompression and stabilization of symptomatic metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC).

Methods A retrospective study on a prospective cohort was conducted. Nineteen patients were consecutively treated with MIDLaC and posterior pedicle screw fixation between May 2012 and July 2014. Demographic information and radiologic outcomes including sagittal deformity correction and vertebral body height were recorded. Operative variables (operative duration, blood loss) and clinical variables (Tokuhashi score, mortality, complication rate, pain visual analogue scale [VAS], opioid usage, and Frankel grade) were recorded and analyzed.

Results All nineteen patients (mean age: 67.6 ± 12.7 years) successfully underwent MIDLaC with excellent neural decompression. Operative duration was 188.4 ± 30.3 minutes for single-level MIDLaC and 327.2 ± 71.9 minutes for multilevel surgery (p < 0.0001). Mean blood loss per spinal level was 390.8 mL with a decrease to 102.3 mL excluding renal cell MSCC. A total of 47.4% of patients had a Tokuhashi score of 0 to 8. There was one approach-related complication and one perioperative mortality. The overall complication rate was 15.8% (n = 3) with no postoperative wound infections. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates at 6 months were 0.50. Overall, 31.6% of patients improved by one or more Frankel grades, and no patients demonstrated worsening neurology postoperatively. VAS was significantly improved postoperatively (p < 0.05). Vertebral body height was significantly increased (+7.6 ± 8.1 mm; p = 0.002), with improvements in lumbar lordosis (8.3 ± 7.3 degrees) and thoracic kyphosis (2.4 ± 7.1 degrees) postoperatively.

Conclusion MIDLaC is a safe and feasible palliative approach in the management of MSCC with encouraging early clinical outcomes. Further prospective studies are required to define the role of MIDLaC in the management of MSCC vis-à-vis other mini-open or minimally invasive techniques.

Keywords

spinal cord compression - neoplasm metastasis - corpectomy

Full Text

References

References
1 Abrams HL, Spiro R, Goldstein N. Metastases in carcinoma; analysis of 1000 autopsied cases. Cancer 1950; 3 (01) 74-85
2 Clain A. Secondary malignant disease of bone. Br J Cancer 1965; 19: 15-29
3 Schaberg J, Gainor BJ. A profile of metastatic carcinoma of the spine. Spine 1985; 10 (01) 19-20
4 Ryken TC, Eichholz KM, Gerszten PC, Welch WC, Gokaslan ZL, Resnick DK. Evidence-based review of the surgical management of vertebral column metastatic disease. Neurosurg Focus 2003; 15 (05) E11
5 Sciubba DM, Gokaslan ZL. Diagnosis and management of metastatic spine disease. Surg Oncol 2006; 15 (03) 141-151
6 Rades D, Fehlauer F, Schulte R. , et al. Prognostic factors for local control and survival after radiotherapy of metastatic spinal cord compression. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24 (21) 3388-3393
7 Rades D, Dunst J, Schild SE. The first score predicting overall survival in patients with metastatic spinal cord compression. Cancer 2008; 112 (01) 157-161
8 Sioutos PJ, Arbit E, Meshulam CF, Galicich JH. Spinal metastases from solid tumors. Analysis of factors affecting survival. Cancer 1995; 76 (08) 1453-1459
9 Levack P, Graham J, Collie D. , et al; Scottish Cord Compression Study Group. Don't wait for a sensory level—listen to the symptoms: a prospective audit of the delays in diagnosis of malignant cord compression. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2002; 14 (06) 472-480
10 Livingston KE, Perrin RG. The neurosurgical management of spinal metastases causing cord and cauda equina compression. J Neurosurg 1978; 49 (06) 839-843
11 Greenberg HS, Kim JH, Posner JB. Epidural spinal cord compression from metastatic tumor: results with a new treatment protocol. Ann Neurol 1980; 8 (04) 361-366
12 Findlay GF. Adverse effects of the management of malignant spinal cord compression. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1984; 47 (08) 761-768
13 Young RF, Post EM, King GA. Treatment of spinal epidural metastases. Randomized prospective comparison of laminectomy and radiotherapy. J Neurosurg 1980; 53 (06) 741-748
14 Patchell RA, Tibbs PA, Regine WF. , et al. Direct decompressive surgical resection in the treatment of spinal cord compression caused by metastatic cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 2005; 366 (9486): 643-648
15 Klimo Jr P, Thompson CJ, Kestle JR, Schmidt MH. A meta-analysis of surgery versus conventional radiotherapy for the treatment of metastatic spinal epidural disease. Neuro Oncol 2005; 7 (01) 64-76
16 Rompe JD, Eysel P, Hopf C, Heine J. Metastatic spinal cord compression—options for surgical treatment. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1993; 123 (3–4): 135-140
17 Tokuhashi Y, Matsuzaki H, Oda H, Oshima M, Ryu J. A revised scoring system for preoperative evaluation of metastatic spine tumor prognosis. Spine 2005; 30 (19) 2186-2191
18 Tomita K, Kawahara N, Kobayashi T, Yoshida A, Murakami H, Akamaru T. Surgical strategy for spinal metastases. Spine 2001; 26 (03) 298-306
19 Uribe JS, Dakwar E, Le TV, Christian G, Serrano S, Smith WD. Minimally invasive surgery treatment for thoracic spine tumor removal: a mini-open, lateral approach. Spine 2010; 35 (26, Suppl): S347-S354
20 Cole JS, Patchell RA. Metastatic epidural spinal cord compression. Lancet Neurol 2008; 7 (05) 459-466
21 Bauer HC. Posterior decompression and stabilization for spinal metastases. Analysis of sixty-seven consecutive patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1997; 79 (04) 514-522
22 Cooper PR, Errico TJ, Martin R, Crawford B, DiBartolo T. A systematic approach to spinal reconstruction after anterior decompression for neoplastic disease of the thoracic and lumbar spine. Neurosurgery 1993; 32 (01) 1-8
23 Fourney DR, Abi-Said D, Rhines LD. , et al. Simultaneous anterior-posterior approach to the thoracic and lumbar spine for the radical resection of tumors followed by reconstruction and stabilization. J Neurosurg 2001; 94 (2, Suppl): 232-244
24 Peeling L, Frangou E, Hentschel S, Gokaslan ZL, Fourney DR. Refinements to the simultaneous anterior-posterior approach to the thoracolumbar spine. J Neurosurg Spine 2010; 12 (05) 456-461
25 Gokaslan ZL, York JE, Walsh GL. , et al. Transthoracic vertebrectomy for metastatic spinal tumors. J Neurosurg 1998; 89 (04) 599-609
26 Xu R, Garcés-Ambrossi GL, McGirt MJ. , et al. Thoracic vertebrectomy and spinal reconstruction via anterior, posterior, or combined approaches: clinical outcomes in 91 consecutive patients with metastatic spinal tumors. J Neurosurg Spine 2009; 11 (03) 272-284
27 Akeyson EW, McCutcheon IE. Single-stage posterior vertebrectomy and replacement combined with posterior instrumentation for spinal metastasis. J Neurosurg 1996; 85 (02) 211-220
28 Sundaresan N, Shah J, Foley KM, Rosen G. An anterior surgical approach to the upper thoracic vertebrae. J Neurosurg 1984; 61 (04) 686-690
29 Lu DC, Lau D, Lee JG, Chou D. The transpedicular approach compared with the anterior approach: an analysis of 80 thoracolumbar corpectomies. J Neurosurg Spine 2010; 12 (06) 583-591
30 Dimar II JR, Wilde PH, Glassman SD, Puno RM, Johnson JR. Thoracolumbar burst fractures treated with combined anterior and posterior surgery. Am J Orthop 1996; 25 (02) 159-165
31 Wang JC, Boland P, Mitra N. , et al. Single-stage posterolateral transpedicular approach for resection of epidural metastatic spine tumors involving the vertebral body with circumferential reconstruction: results in 140 patients. Invited submission from the Joint Section Meeting on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves, March 2004. J Neurosurg Spine 2004; 1 (03) 287-298
32 Chou D, Lu DC. Mini-open transpedicular corpectomies with expandable cage reconstruction. Technical note. J Neurosurg Spine 2011; 14 (01) 71-77
33 Lall RR, Smith ZA, Wong AP, Miller D, Fessler RG. Minimally invasive thoracic corpectomy: surgical strategies for malignancy, trauma, and complex spinal pathologies. Minim Invasive Surg 2012; 2012: 213791
34 Harrington KD. Metastatic disease of the spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1986; 68 (07) 1110-1115
35 Huang TJ, Hsu RW, Liu HP. , et al. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery to the upper thoracic spine. Surg Endosc 1999; 13 (02) 123-126
36 Kim DH, Jaikumar S, Kam AC. Minimally invasive spine instrumentation. Neurosurgery 2002; 51 (5, Suppl): S15-S25
37 Saigal R, Wadhwa R, Mummaneni PV, Chou D. Minimally invasive extracavitary transpedicular corpectomy for the management of spinal tumors. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2014; 25 (02) 305-315
38 Ofluoglu O. Minimally invasive management of spinal metastases. Orthop Clin North Am 2009; 40 (01) 155-168 , viii v iii.
39 Huang TJ, Hsu RW, Li YY, Cheng CC. Minimal access spinal surgery (MASS) in treating thoracic spine metastasis. Spine 2006; 31 (16) 1860-1863
40 Payer M, Sottas C. Mini-open anterior approach for corpectomy in the thoracolumbar spine. Surg Neurol 2008; 69 (01) 25-31 ; discussion 31–32
41 Stener B. Complete removal of vertebrae for extirpation of tumors. A 20-year experience. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989; (245) 72-82