J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2017; 78(04): 337-343
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1594012
Original Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Neurosurgical Resident Training in Germany

Martin N. Stienen
1   Service de Neurochirurgie, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, Genève, Switzerland
Jens Gempt
2   Neurochirurgische Klinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, München, Germany
Oliver P. Gautschi
1   Service de Neurochirurgie, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, Genève, Switzerland
Andreas K. Demetriades
3   Department of Neurosurgery, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, United Kingdom
David Netuka
4   Department of Neurosurgery, Charles University, Central Military Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
Dominique E. Kuhlen
5   Department of Neurosurgery, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Lugano, Switzerland
Karl Schaller
1   Service de Neurochirurgie, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, Genève, Switzerland
Florian Ringel
6   Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Mainz, Deutschland
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

02 November 2015

18 April 2016

Publication Date:
30 November 2016 (online)


Introduction Efficient neurosurgical training is of paramount importance to provide continuing high-quality medical care to patients. In this era of law-enforced working hour restrictions, however, maintaining high-quality training can be a challenge and requires some restructuring. We evaluated the current status of resident training in Germany.

Methods An electronic survey was sent to European neurosurgical trainees between June 2014 and March 2015. The responses of German trainees were compared with those of trainees from other European countries. Logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the effect size of the relationship between a trainee being from Germany and the outcome (e.g., satisfaction, working time).

Results Of 532 responses, 95 were from German trainees (17.8%). In a multivariate analysis corrected for baseline group differences, German trainees were 29% as likely as non-German trainees to be satisfied with clinical lectures given at their teaching facility (odds ratio [OR]: 0.29; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.18–0.49; p < 0.0001). The satisfaction rate with hands-on operating room exposure was 73.9% and equal to the rate in Europe (OR: 0.94; 95% CI, 0.56–1.59; p = 0.834). German trainees were 2.3 times as likely to perform a lumbar spine intervention as the primary surgeon within the first year of training (OR: 2.27; 95% CI, 1.42–3.64; p = 0.001). However, they were less likely to perform a cervical spine procedure within 24 months of training (OR: 0.38; 95% CI, 0.17–0.82; p = 0.014) and less likely to perform a craniotomy within 36 months of training (OR: 0.49; 95% CI, 0.31–0.79; p = 0.003). Only 25.6% of German trainees currently adhere to the weekly limit of 48 hours as requested from the European Working Time Directive 2003/88/EC, and in an international comparison, German trainees were twice as likely to work > 50 hours per week (OR: 2.13; 95% CI, 1.25–3.61; p = 0.005). This working time, however, is less spent in the operating suite (OR: 0.26; 95% CI, 0.11–0.59; p = 0.001) and more doing administrative work (OR: 1.83; 95% CI, 1.13–2.96; p = 0.015).

Conclusion Some theoretical and practical aspects of neurosurgical training are superior, but a considerable proportion of relevant aspects are inferior in Germany compared with other European countries. The present analyses provide the opportunity for a critical review of the local conditions in German training facilities.

Supplementary Material

  • References

  • 1 Omerhodzic I, Tonge M, Matos B. , et al. Neurosurgical training programme in selected European countries: from the young neurosurgeons' point of view. Turk Neurosurg 2012; 22 (03) 286-293
  • 2 Izquierdo JM. A programme of neurosurgical education. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1990; 107 (3-4): 171-178
  • 3 Long DM. European Union of Medical Specialists. The ideal neurosurgical training curriculum. Acta Neurochir Suppl 2004; 90: 21-31
  • 4 Burkhardt JK, Zinn PO, Bozinov O, Colen RR, Bertalanffy H, Kasper EM. Neurosurgical education in Europe and the United States of America. Neurosurg Rev 2010; 33 (04) 409-417
  • 5 EUR-Lex. Access to European Union law. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:32003L0088
  • 6 Schaller K. Neurosurgical training under European law. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2013; 155 (03) 547
  • 7 Stienen MN, Netuka D, Demetriades AK. , et al. Neurosurgical resident education in Europe—results of a multinational survey. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2016; 158 (01) 3-15
  • 8 Stienen MN, Netuka D, Demetriades AK. , et al. Working time of neurosurgical residents in Europe—results of a multinational survey. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2016; 158 (01) 17-25
  • 9 Stienen MN, Joswig H, Jucker D, Hildebrandt G, Schaller K, Gautschi OP. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: is surgical education safe?. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2015; 157 (08) 1395-1404
  • 10 Stienen MN, Smoll NR, Hildebrandt G, Schaller K, Gautschi OP. Early surgical education of residents is safe for microscopic lumbar disc surgery. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2014; 156 (06) 1205-1214
  • 11 Stienen MN, Smoll NR, Tessitore E, Schaller K, Hildebrandt G, Gautschi OP. Surgical resident education in noninstrumented lumbar spine surgery: a prospective observational study with a 4.5-year follow-up. World Neurosurg 2015; 84 (06) 1589-1597
  • 12 Joswig H, Hock C, Hildebrandt G, Schaller K, Stienen MN. Microscopic lumbar spinal stenosis decompression: is surgical education safe?. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2016; 158 (02) 357-366
  • 13 Stienen MN, Netuka D, Demetriades AK, Ringel F. , et al. Residency program trainee-satisfaction correlate with results of the European board examination in neurosurgery. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2016; 158 (10) 1823-30 . doi: 10.1007/s00701-016-2917-y
  • 14 Brennum J. European neurosurgical education—the next generation. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2000; 142 (10) 1081-1087