Pneumologie 2017; 71(S 01): S1-S125
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1598310
Posterbegehung – Sektion Klinische Pneumologie
COPD I – Andreas Rembert Koczulla/Marburg, Henrik Watz/Großhansdorf
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Validity and usability of physical activity monitoring in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)

T Böselt
1  Klinik für Innere Medizin, Schwerpunkt Pneumologie, Philipps Universität Marburg
,
M Spielmanns
2  Medizinische Klinik und Ambulante Pneumologische Rehabilitation in Leverkusen (April)
,
C Nell
1  Klinik für Innere Medizin, Schwerpunkt Pneumologie, Philipps Universität Marburg
,
JH Storre
3  Abt. Pneumologie, Lungenklinik, Kliniken der Stadt Köln gGmbH, University of Witten/Herdecke
,
W Windisch
3  Abt. Pneumologie, Lungenklinik, Kliniken der Stadt Köln gGmbH, University of Witten/Herdecke
,
L Magerhans
4  Klinik für Innere Medizin, Schwerpunkt Nephrologie, Philipps Universität Marburg
,
B Beutel
1  Klinik für Innere Medizin, Schwerpunkt Pneumologie, Philipps Universität Marburg
,
K Kenn
5  Schön Klinik Berchtesgadener Land; Philipps Universität Marburg
,
T Greulich
6  Klinik für Innere Medizin, Schwerpunkt Pneumologie, Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg, Standort Marburg
,
P Alter
6  Klinik für Innere Medizin, Schwerpunkt Pneumologie, Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg, Standort Marburg
,
C Vogelmeier
6  Klinik für Innere Medizin, Schwerpunkt Pneumologie, Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg, Standort Marburg
,
AR Koczulla
6  Klinik für Innere Medizin, Schwerpunkt Pneumologie, Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg, Standort Marburg
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
23 February 2017 (online)

 

Background:

A large proportion of COPD patients do not achieve the recommended level of physical activity. It is suggested that feedback on the level activity by using an activity monitoring device (PAM) increase awareness and may stimulate patients to increase their physical activity in daily life. Our objective was to assess the validity and usability of a simple and low-cost physical activity monitor (Polar A300™) when compared with the validated and established Bodymedia Sensewear™ (SWA) device.

Methods:

To assess the diagnostic equivalent, two different PAM devices were used in parallel in 20 COPD patients GOLD I to IV during 3 consecutive days of daily life. Both systems were compared in terms of steps, calories burned, daily activity time and metabolic equivalents using linear regression analysis and Bland-Altman plots. Practical usability was examined by a 16-item-questionnaire.

Results:

High correlations of both devices were observed with regard to the sensed step count (r = 0.96; p < 0.01) and calories burned (r = 0.74; p < 0.01), and a lower correlation of daily activity (r = 0.25; p < 0.01) was found. Data analysis over 3 days showed that 90% of the steps (95% CI -4223 to 1887), 100% of the calories (95% CI -2798 to 1887), 90% of the daily activity data (95% CI -12.32, 4065) and 95% of the MET (95% CI -3.11 to 2.75) were within the limits of agreement. A favorable usability (system-, information- and interface quality) of the A300™ device was shown (p < 0.01).

Conclusion:

The A300™ device with easy practical usability was shown not to be inferior for assessment of physical activity time, step count and calorie consumption in COPD patients when compared with the SWA. It is suggested to consider widespread available devices as commonly used for monitoring recreational sporting activities also in patients for assessment of physical activity in daily live.