Residents' Learning Curve of Lumbar Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injections

Abstract

Background and Study Aims There is a paucity of literature on beginners' training and on its connection with patient safety for transforaminal epidural steroid injections (TFESIs). This study retrospectively assessed the learning curves and associated complications of neurosurgery residents never previously exposed to TFESI and compared them with experienced board-certified faculty neurosurgeons (BCFNs).

Material and Methods Procedure time in minutes, dose-area product (DAP) in cGy*cm², periprocedural observations, and complications in 354 TFESIs for radicular pain secondary to lumbar disk herniation or lumbar spinal stenosis were extracted from operative notes and the electronic infiltration logbook in the per-injection format. Learning curves for 238 residents and 116 BCFN TFESIs in terms of procedure time and DAP were estimated using monotone regression.

Results Residents' TFESI procedure time and DAP reached BCFN level (4.7 minutes and 140.2 Gy*cm²) after 67 and 68 cases, respectively. Residents' TFESIs were unsuccessful in 1.7%, mostly for severe obesity and hypertrophied facet joints, but no severe complications were noted. Obesity, however, did not result in increased procedure times or radiation exposure in general. Residents were faster and required less fluoroscopy in TFESI of the upper lumbar nerve roots than for L5 or S1 in particular.

Conclusion The residents' learning curve for TFESIs in terms of procedure time and radiation exposure can be overcome safely after < 70 TFESIs. An outcome analysis correlating to the interventionalist's training level would be worth investigating in future studies.

Keywords

learning curve - lumbar disk herniation - lumbar spinal stenosis - resident training - transforaminal epidural steroid injection

• References

• 1 Rathmell JP, Benzon HT, Dreyfuss P. , et al. Safeguards to prevent neurologic complications after epidural steroid injections: consensus opinions from a multidisciplinary working group and national organizations. Anesthesiology 2015; 122 (05) 974-984
• 2 Brändle K, Stienen MN, Neff A, Hildebrandt G, Joswig H. Ten-day response to CT-guided spinal infiltration therapy in more than a thousand patients. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2016; 77 (03) 181-194
• 3 Tiegs-Heiden CA, Murthy NS, Geske JR. , et al. Fluoroscopically guided transforaminal epidural steroid injections at a quaternary-care teaching institution: effect of trainee involvement and patient body mass index on fluoroscopy time and patient dose. Clin Radiol 2016; 71 (01) e16-e20
• 4 Rados I, Sakic K, Fingler M, Kapural L. Efficacy of interlaminar vs transforaminal epidural steroid injection for the treatment of chronic unilateral radicular pain: prospective, randomized study. Pain Med 2011; 12 (09) 1316-1321
• 5 Ackerman III WE, Ahmad M. The efficacy of lumbar epidural steroid injections in patients with lumbar disc herniations. Anesth Analg 2007; 104 (05) 1217-1222
• 6 Gharibo CG, Varlotta GP, Rhame EE, Liu EC, Bendo JA, Perloff MD. Interlaminar versus transforaminal epidural steroids for the treatment of subacute lumbar radicular pain: a randomized, blinded, prospective outcome study. Pain Physician 2011; 14 (06) 499-511
• 7 Schaufele MK, Hatch L, Jones W. Interlaminar versus transforaminal epidural injections for the treatment of symptomatic lumbar intervertebral disc herniations. Pain Physician 2006; 9 (04) 361-366
• 8 Manchikanti L, Cash KA, Pampati V, Damron KS, McManus CD. Evaluation of lumbar transforaminal epidural injections with needle placement and contrast flow patterns: a prospective, descriptive report. Pain Physician 2004; 7 (02) 217-223
• 9 Smuck M, Zheng P, Chong T, Kao MC, Geisser ME. Duration of fluoroscopic-guided spine interventions and radiation exposure is increased in overweight patients. PM R 2013; 5 (04) 291-296 ; quiz 296
• 10 R Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. 2013. Available at: http://www.R-project.org/ . Accessed October 24, 2016
• 11 Joswig H, Hock C, Hildebrandt G, Schaller K, Stienen MN. Microscopic lumbar spinal stenosis decompression: is surgical education safe?. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2016; 158 (02) 357-366
• 12 Joswig H, Richter H, Haile SR, Hildebrandt G, Fournier JY. Introducing Interlaminar full-endoscopic lumbar diskectomy: a critical analysis of complications, recurrence rates, and outcome in view of two spinal surgeons' learning curves. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2016; 77 (05) 406-415
• 13 Stienen MN, Joswig H, Jucker D, Hildebrandt G, Schaller K, Gautschi OP. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: is surgical education safe?. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2015; 157 (08) 1395-1404
• 14 Stienen MN, Smoll NR, Hildebrandt G, Schaller K, Gautschi OP. Early surgical education of residents is safe for microscopic lumbar disc surgery. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2014; 156 (06) 1205-1214
• 15 Stienen MN, Smoll NR, Tessitore E, Schaller K, Hildebrandt G, Gautschi OP. Surgical resident education in noninstrumented lumbar spine surgery: a prospective observational study with a 4.5-year follow-up. World Neurosurg 2015; 84 (06) 1589-1597
• 16 Joswig H, Gautschi OP, El Rahal A. , et al. Cranioplasty: is surgical education safe?. World Neurosurg 2016; 91: 81-88
• 17 Visco CJ, Kennedy DJ, Chimes GP. , et al. Programmatic design for teaching the introductory skills and concepts of lumbar spine procedures to physiatry residents: a prospective multiyear study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2013; 92 (03) 248-257
• 18 Smuck M, Abbott Z, Zemper E. Interpretation of contrast dispersal patterns by experienced and inexperienced interventionalists. PM R 2009; 1 (01) 55-59
• 19 Ramsay CR, Grant AM, Wallace SA, Garthwaite PH, Monk AF, Russell IT. Assessment of the learning curve in health technologies. A systematic review. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2000; 16 (04) 1095-1108