Download PDF
J Reconstr Microsurg 2017; 33(08): 544-548
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1602740
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Donor-Site Outcomes for the Osteocutaneous Radial Forearm Free Flap

Ellen S. Satteson
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
,
Adam C. Satteson
2   Department of Otolaryngology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
,
Joshua D. Waltonen
2   Department of Otolaryngology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
,
Zhongyu Li
3   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
,
Ethan R. Wiesler
3   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
,
Peter J. Apel
3   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
,
Benjamin R. Graves
3   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

09 October 2016

23 March 2017

Publication Date:
10 May 2017 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background This study sought to characterize the donor-site complications associated with the osteocutaneous radial forearm free flap (ORFFF) used for mandibular reconstruction, as well as to compare donor-site complications between the ORFFF and fasciocutaneous radial forearm free flap (FRFFF).

Methods An Institution Review Board approved, retrospective review identified all ORFFF and FRFFF performed for head and neck reconstruction with a single otolaryngology surgeon at an academic medical center over a 3-year period. Patients requiring an ORFFF underwent harvest of half of the diaphyseal diameter of the radius with prophylactic plating performed by hand surgeons. Donor-site outcomes including infection, skin graft loss, tendon exposure, neuropathy, radius fracture, hardware complications, and need for additional donor-site surgery were compared.

Results In this study, 25 patients underwent ORFFF harvest, and 52 underwent FRFFF harvest. There was one radius fracture occurring in association with a hardware infection requiring reoperation. No fractures or other major donor-site complications were seen in the FRFFF group. Similar rates of minor complications were noted with skin graft take less than 50% in 4% (n = 1) and 8% (n = 4) with ORFFF and FRFFF, respectively, and tendon exposure in 8% (n = 2) and 15% (n = 8) with ORFFF and FRFFF, respectively. No soft tissue infections or sensory neuropathies were seen. Mean follow-up was 14.2 months for the ORFFF group and 11.7 months for the FRFFF group.

Conclusion The risk of fracture following ORFFF harvest with prophylactic plating is small. Other donor-site complication rates were similar with both flap techniques.

Keywords

osteocutaneous - outcomes - radial forearm free flap

Letter to this article:

Donor-Site Outcomes for the Osteocutaneous Radial Forearm Free FlapJ Reconstr Microsurg 2017; 33(08): e3-e4
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1635087

 

  • References

  • 1 Yang GF, Chen PJ, Gao YZ. , et al. Forearm free skin flap transplantation: a report of 56 cases. 1981. Br J Plast Surg 1997; 50 (03) 162-165
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Smith RB, Henstrom DK, Karnell LH, Chang KC, Goldstein DP, Funk GF. Scapula osteocutaneous free flap reconstruction of the head and neck: impact of flap choice on surgical and medical complications. Head Neck 2007; 29 (05) 446-452
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Song R, Gao Y, Song Y, Yu Y, Song Y. The forearm flap. Clin Plast Surg 1982; 9 (01) 21-26
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Arganbright JM, Tsue TT, Girod DA. , et al. Outcomes of the osteocutaneous radial forearm free flap for mandibular reconstruction. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013; 139 (02) 168-172
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Richardson D, Fisher SE, Vaughan ED, Brown JS. Radial forearm flap donor-site complications and morbidity: a prospective study. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997; 99 (01) 109-115
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Werle AH, Tsue TT, Toby EB, Girod DA. Osteocutaneous radial forearm free flap: its use without significant donor site morbidity. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000; 123 (06) 711-717
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Handschel J, Hassanyar H, Depprich RA. , et al. Nonvascularized iliac bone grafts for mandibular reconstruction--requirements and limitations. In Vivo 2011; 25 (05) 795-799
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Mehta RP, Deschler DG. Mandibular reconstruction in 2004: an analysis of different techniques. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004; 12 (04) 288-293
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Ling XF, Peng X. What is the price to pay for a free fibula flap? A systematic review of donor-site morbidity following free fibula flap surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 129 (03) 657-674
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Virgin FW, Iseli TA, Iseli CE. , et al. Functional outcomes of fibula and osteocutaneous forearm free flap reconstruction for segmental mandibular defects. Laryngoscope 2010; 120 (04) 663-667
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Thoma A, Khadaroo R, Grigenas O. , et al. Oromandibular reconstruction with the radial-forearm osteocutaneous flap: experience with 60 consecutive cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 104 (02) 368-378 , discussion 379–380
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Nuñez VA, Pike J, Avery C, Rosson JW, Johnson P. Prophylactic plating of the donor site of osteocutaneous radial forearm flaps. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1999; 37 (03) 210-212
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Sinclair CF, Gleysteen JP, Zimmermann TM. , et al. Assessment of donor site morbidity for free radial forearm osteocutaneous flaps. Microsurgery 2012; 32 (04) 255-260
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Villaret DB, Futran NA. The indications and outcomes in the use of osteocutaneous radial forearm free flap. Head Neck 2003; 25 (06) 475-481
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Kim JH, Rosenthal EL, Ellis T, Wax MK. Radial forearm osteocutaneous free flap in maxillofacial and oromandibular reconstructions. Laryngoscope 2005; 115 (09) 1697-1701
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Gonzalez-Castro J, Petrisor D, Ballard D, Wax MK. The double-barreled radial forearm osteocutaneous free flap. Laryngoscope 2016; 126 (02) 340-344
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Silverman DA, Przylecki WH, Shnayder Y, Tsue TT, Girod DA, Andrews BT. Expanding the utilization of the osteocutaneous radial forearm free flap beyond mandibular reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg 2016; 32 (05) 361-365
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 El-Khatib HA, Hammouda AH. Reverse osseofasciocutaneous radial forearm flap for thumb reconstruction: a flap design and case series. J Hand Surg Am 2005; 30 (06) 1298-1304
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Jevtović D, Dordević B, Gacević M, Sijan G. Reconstruction of the thumb using a forearm osseofasciocutaneous reverse flap [in Serbian]. Vojnosanit Pregl 2002; 59 (06) 601-607
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Yajima H, Tamai S, Yamauchi T, Mizumoto S. Osteocutaneous radial forearm flap for hand reconstruction. J Hand Surg Am 1999; 24 (03) 594-603
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Shahryar Kamrani R, Farhoud AR, Nabian MH, Farhadi L. Treatment of nonunion of forearm bones using radial forearm bone flap. Trauma Mon 2015; 20 (04) e22622
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Mullett H, Hausman M, Zaidemberg C. Recalcitrant distal humeral and proximal forearm nonunion: salvage using an extended pedicled radial forearm osseous flap. J Trauma 2008; 64 (04) E60-E64
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar