CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 2017; 39(08): 403-407
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1603965
Original Article
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Evaluation of Cases of Abdominal Wall Endometriosis at Universidade Estadual de Campinas in a period of 10 Years

Avaliação dos casos de endometriose de parede abdominal na Universidade Estadual de Campinas em um período de 10 anos
Daniela Angerame Yela
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (Unicamp), Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil
,
Lucas Trigo
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (Unicamp), Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil
,
Cristina Laguna Benetti-Pinto
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (Unicamp), Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

21 January 2017

03 April 2017

Publication Date:
21 June 2017 (online)

Abstract

Purpose To determine the clinical and epidemiological characteristics of abdominal wall endometriosis (AWE), as well as the rate and recurrence factors for the disease.

Methods A retrospective study of 52 women with AWE was performed at Universidade Estadual de Campinas from 2004 to 2014. Of the 231 surgeries performed for the diagnosis of endometriosis, 52 women were found to have abdominal wall endometriosis (AWE). The frequencies, means and standard deviations of the clinical characteristics of these women were calculated, as well as the recurrence rate of AWE. To determine the risk factors for disease recurrence, Fisher's exact test was used.

Results The mean age of the patients was 30.71 ± 5.91 years. The main clinical manifestations were pain (98%) and sensation of a mass (36.5%). We observed that 94% of these women had undergone at least 1 cesarean section, and 73% had used medication for the postoperative control of endometriosis. The lesion was most commonly located in the cesarean section scar (65%). The recurrence rate of the disease was of 26.9%. All 14 women who had relapsed had surgical margins compromised in the previous surgery. There was no correlation between recurrent AWE and a previous cesarean section (p = 0.18), previous laparotomy (p = 0.11), previous laparoscopy (p = 0.12) and postoperative hormone therapy (p = 0.51).

Conclusion Women with previous cesarean sections with local pain or lumps should be investigated for AWE. The recurrence of AWE is high, especially when the first surgery is not appropriate and leaves compromised surgical margins.

Resumo

Objetivos Determinar as características clínicas e epidemiológicas da endometriose de parede, bem como sua taxa de recorrência e os fatores que levam a ela.

Métodos Estudo retrospectivo, em que se avaliaram 52 mulheres com endometriose de parede na Universidade Estadual de Campinas no período de 2004 a 2014. Entre as 231 cirurgias para diagnosticar endometriose, foram encontradas 52 mulheres que apresentavam endometriose de parede. Foram calculadas as frequências, a média e o desvio padrão das características clínicas destas mulheres, bem como a taxa de recorrência da endometriose de parede. Para determinar os fatores de risco de recorrência, foi utilizado o teste exato de Fisher.

Resultados A idade média das mulheres foi de 30.71 ± 5,91 anos. As principais manifestações clínicas foram dor (98%) e sensação do nódulo (36,5%). Foi observado que 94% dessas mulheres tinham pelo menos uma cesárea, e 73% destas fizeram uso de medicação para controle da endometriose no pós-operatório. A localização mais frequente da lesão foi na cicatriz da cesárea (65%). A taxa de recorrência da doença foi de 26,9%. Todas as 14 mulheres que tiveram recidiva tinham margens cirúrgicas comprometidas na cirurgia prévia. Não houve correlação entre a endometriose de parede recorrente e a cesariana prévia (p = 0,18), a laparotomia prévia (p = 0,11), a laparoscopia prévia (p = 0,12) e receber terapia hormonal no pós-operatório (p = 0,51).

Conclusão Mulheres com antecedente de cesárea anterior com dor local ou nódulo devem ser investigadas com relação à endometriose de parede. A recorrência do endometrioma de parede é alta, principalmente quando a primeira cirurgia não é adequada, e deixa margens cirúrgicas comprometidas.

 
  • References

  • 1 Giudice LC, Kao LC. Endometriosis. Lancet 2004; 364 (9447): 1789-1799
  • 2 Bektaş H, Bilsel Y, Sari YS. , et al. Abdominal wall endometrioma; a 10-year experience and brief review of the literature. J Surg Res 2010; 164 (01) e77-e81
  • 3 Douglas C, Rotimi O. Extragenital endometriosis--a clinicopathological review of a Glasgow hospital experience with case illustrations. J Obstet Gynaecol 2004; 24 (07) 804-808
  • 4 Mascaretti G, Di Berardino C, Mastrocola N, Patacchiola F. Endometriosis: rare localizations in two cases. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 2007; 34 (02) 123-125
  • 5 Liu K, Zhang W, Liu S, Dong B, Liu Y. Hepatic endometriosis: a rare case and review of the literature. Eur J Med Res 2015; 20: 48
  • 6 Lee HJ, Park YM, Jee BC, Kim YB, Suh CS. Various anatomic locations of surgically proven endometriosis: A single-center experience. Obstet Gynecol Sci 2015; 58 (01) 53-58
  • 7 Badawy SZ, Shrestha P. Recurrent catamenial pneumothorax suggestive of pleural endometriosis. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol 2014; 2014: 756040
  • 8 Huang H, Li C, Zarogoulidis P. , et al. Endometriosis of the lung: report of a case and literature review. Eur J Med Res 2013; 18: 13
  • 9 Mostafa HA, Saad JH, Nadeem Z, Alharbi F. Rectus abdominis endometriosis. A descriptive analysis of 10 cases concerning this rare occurrence. Saudi Med J 2013; 34 (10) 1035-1042
  • 10 Nezhat C, King LP, Paka C, Odegaard J, Beygui R. Bilateral thoracic endometriosis affecting the lung and diaphragm. JSLS 2012; 16 (01) 140-142
  • 11 Veeraswamy A, Lewis M, Mann A, Kotikela S, Hajhosseini B, Nezhat C. Extragenital endometriosis. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2010; 53 (02) 449-466
  • 12 Nominato NS, Prates LFVS, Lauar I, Morais J, Maia L, Geber S. Caesarean section greatly increases risk of scar endometriosis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2010; 152 (01) 83-85
  • 13 Nominato NS, Prates LFVS, Lauar I, Morais J, Maia L, Geber S. [Scar endometriosis: a retrospective study of 72 patients]. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 2007; 29 (08) 423-427 Portuguese
  • 14 Sinha R, Kumar M, Matah M. Abdominal scar endometriosis after Caesarean section: a rare entity. Australas Med J 2011; 4 (01) 60-62
  • 15 Chang Y, Tsai EM, Long CY, Chen YH, Kay N. Abdominal wall endometriomas. J Reprod Med 2009; 54 (03) 155-159
  • 16 Papavramidis TS, Sapalidis K, Michalopoulos N. , et al. Spontaneous abdominal wall endometriosis: a case report. Acta Chir Belg 2009; 109 (06) 778-781
  • 17 Wasfie T, Gomez E, Seon S, Zado B. Abdominal wall endometrioma after cesarean section: a preventable complication. Int Surg 2002; 87 (03) 175-177
  • 18 Sirito R, Puppo A, Centurioni MG, Gustavino C. Incisional hernia on the 5-mm trocar port site and subsequent wall endometriosis on the same site: a case report. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 193 (3 Pt 1): 878-880
  • 19 Rao R, Devalia H, Zaidi A. Post-caesarean incisional hernia or scar endometrioma?. Surgeon 2006; 4 (01) 55-56
  • 20 Leite GKC, Carvalho LFP, Korkes H, Guazzelli TF, Kenj G, Viana AdeT. Scar endometrioma following obstetric surgical incisions: retrospective study on 33 cases and review of the literature. Sao Paulo Med J 2009; 127 (05) 270-277
  • 21 Ding Y, Zhu J. A retrospective review of abdominal wall endometriosis in Shanghai, China. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2013; 121 (01) 41-44
  • 22 Vilarino FL, Bianco B, Martins ACM, Christofolini DM, Barbosa CP. [Surgical scar endometriosis: a series of 42 patients]. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 2011; 33 (03) 123-127 Portuguese
  • 23 Ecker AM, Donnellan NM, Shepherd JP, Lee TT. Abdominal wall endometriosis: 12 years of experience at a large academic institution. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 211 (04) 363.e1-363.e5
  • 24 Horton JD, Dezee KJ, Ahnfeldt EP, Wagner M. Abdominal wall endometriosis: a surgeon's perspective and review of 445 cases. Am J Surg 2008; 196 (02) 207-212
  • 25 Zhao X, Lang J, Leng J, Liu Z, Sun D, Zhu L. Abdominal wall endometriomas. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2005; 90 (03) 218-222
  • 26 Akbulut S, Sevinc MM, Bakir S, Cakabay B, Sezgin A. Scar endometriosis in the abdominal wall: a predictable condition for experienced surgeons. Acta Chir Belg 2010; 110 (03) 303-307
  • 27 de Oliveira MA, de Leon ACP, Freire EC, de Oliveira HC. Risk factors for abdominal scar endometriosis after obstetric hysterotomies: a case-control study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2007; 86 (01) 73-80
  • 28 Wicherek L, Klimek M, Skret-Magierlo J. , et al. The obstetrical history in patients with Pfannenstiel scar endometriomas--an analysis of 81 patients. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2007; 63 (02) 107-113
  • 29 Nissotakis C, Zouros E, Revelos K, Sakorafas GH. Abdominal wall endometrioma: a case report and review of the literature. AORN J 2010; 91 (06) 730-742 , quiz 743–745