PDF herunterladen
CC BY 4.0 · Surg J (N Y) 2017; 03(04): e163-e166
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1608651
Review Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

A New Era of Minimally Invasive Surgery: Progress and Development of Major Technical Innovations in General Surgery Over the Last Decade

Manjunath Siddaiah-Subramanya
1   Department of Surgery, Logan Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
2   Department of Medicine, Griffith University, Queensland, Australia
3   Department of Medicine, University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia
,
Kor Woi Tiang
1   Department of Surgery, Logan Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
2   Department of Medicine, Griffith University, Queensland, Australia
3   Department of Medicine, University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia
,
Masimba Nyandowe
4   Department of Surgery, Townsville Hospital, Townsville, Queensland, Australia
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

02. August 2017

26. September 2017

Publikationsdatum:
09. November 2017 (online)

   Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) continues to play an important role in general surgery as an alternative to traditional open surgery as well as traditional laparoscopic techniques. Since the 1980s, technological advancement and innovation have seen surgical techniques in MIS rapidly grow as it is viewed as more desirable. MIS, which includes natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) and single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS), is less invasive and has better cosmetic results. The technological growth and adoption of NOTES and SILS by clinicians in the last decade has however not been uniform. We look at the differences in new developments and advancement in the different techniques in the last 10 years. We also aim to explain these differences as well as the implications in general surgery for the future.

Keywords

laparoscopy - innovation - minimally invasive surgery - keyhole surgery - natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery - single-incision laparoscopic surgery
 

  • References

  • 1 Trajtenberg M. A penny for your quotes-patent citations and the value of innovations. RAND J Econ 1990; 21 (01) 172-187
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Hughes-Hallett A, Mayer EK, Pratt PJ, Vale JA, Darzi AW. Quantitative analysis of technological innovation in minimally invasive surgery. Br J Surg 2015; 102 (02) e151-e157
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Diana M, Marescaux J. Robotic surgery. Br J Surg 2015; 102 (02) e15-e28
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Nicolau S, Soler L, Mutter D, Marescaux J. Augmented reality in laparoscopic surgical oncology. Surg Oncol 2011; 20 (03) 189-201
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 D'Agostino J, Diana M, Vix M, Soler L, Marescaux J. Three-dimensional virtual neck exploration before parathyroidectomy. N Engl J Med 2012; 367 (11) 1072-1073
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Marescaux J, Leroy J, Gagner M. , et al. Transatlantic robot-assisted telesurgery. Nature 2001; 413 (6854): 379-380
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Haidegger T, Sándor J, Benyó Z. Surgery in space: the future of robotic telesurgery. Surg Endosc 2011; 25 (03) 681-690
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Kirkpatrick AW, Keaney M, Kmet L. , et al. Intraperitoneal gas insufflation will be required for laparoscopic visualization in space: a comparison of laparoscopic techniques in weightlessness. J Am Coll Surg 2009; 209 (02) 233-241
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Doarn CR, Anvari M, Low T, Broderick TJ. Evaluation of teleoperated surgical robots in an enclosed undersea environment. Telemed J E Health 2009; 15 (04) 325-335
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Lum MJH, Rosen J, King H. , et al. Telesurgery via unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) with a field deployable surgical robot. Stud Health Technol Inform 2007; 125: 313-315
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Rayman R, Croome K, Galbraith N. , et al. Robotic telesurgery: a real-world comparison of ground- and satellite-based internet performance. Int J Med Robot 2007; 3 (02) 111-116
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Delaney CP, Lynch AC, Senagore AJ, Fazio VW. Comparison of robotically performed and traditional laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 2003; 46 (12) 1633-1639
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Kanji A, Gill RS, Shi X, Birch DW, Karmali S. Robotic-assisted colon and rectal surgery: a systematic review. Int J Med Robot 2011; 7 (04) 401-407
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Woo Y, Hyung WJ, Pak KH. , et al. Robotic gastrectomy as an oncologically sound alternative to laparoscopic resections for the treatment of early-stage gastric cancers. Arch Surg 2011; 146 (09) 1086-1092
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Leroy J, Diana M, Perretta S, Wall J, De Ruijter V, Marescaux J. Original technique to close the transrectal viscerotomy access in a NOTES transrectal and transgastric segmental colectomy. Surg Innov 2011; 18 (03) 193-200
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Clark J, Sodergren MH, Purkayastha S. , et al. The role of robotic assisted laparoscopy for oesophagogastric oncological resection; an appraisal of the literature. Dis Esophagus 2011; 24 (04) 240-250
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Melvin WS, Dundon JM, Talamini M, Horgan S. Computer-enhanced robotic telesurgery minimizes esophageal perforation during Heller myotomy. Surgery 2005; 138 (04) 553-558 , discussion 558–559
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Hagen ME, Pugin F, Chassot G. , et al. Reducing cost of surgery by avoiding complications: the model of robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg 2012; 22 (01) 52-61
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Markar SR, Karthikesalingam AP, Venkat-Ramen V, Kinross J, Ziprin P. Robotic vs. laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in morbidly obese patients: systematic review and pooled analysis. Int J Med Robot 2011; 7 (04) 393-400
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Breitenstein S, Nocito A, Puhan M, Held U, Weber M, Clavien PA. Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a case-matched control study. Ann Surg 2008; 247 (06) 987-993
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Chen Y, Yan J, Yuan Z, Yu S, Wang Z, Zheng Q. A meta-analysis of robotic-assisted pancreatectomy versus laparoscopic and open pancreatectomy. Saudi Med J 2013; 34 (12) 1229-1236
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Sbrana F. , et al. Robotic liver surgery: results for 70 resections. Surgery 2011; 149 (01) 29-39
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Al-Akash M, Boyle E, Tanner WANOTES. N.O.T.E.S.: the progression of a novel and emerging technique. Surg Oncol 2009; 18 (02) 95-103
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Kalloo AN, Singh VK, Jagannath SB. , et al. Flexible transgastric peritoneoscopy: a novel approach to diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in the peritoneal cavity. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 60 (01) 114-117
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Varadarajulu S, Tamhane A, Drelichman ER. Patient perception of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery as a technique for cholecystectomy. Gastrointest Endosc 2008; 67 (06) 854-860
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Hazey JW, Narula VK, Renton DB. , et al. Natural-orifice transgastric endoscopic peritoneoscopy in humans: Initial clinical trial. Surg Endosc 2008; 22 (01) 16-20
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Shih SP, Kantsevoy SV, Kalloo AN. , et al. Hybrid minimally invasive surgery–a bridge between laparoscopic and translumenal surgery. Surg Endosc 2007; 21 (08) 1450-1453
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Zornig C, Emmermann A, von Waldenfels HA, Mofid H. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy without visible scar: combined transvaginal and transumbilical approach. Endoscopy 2007; 39 (10) 913-915
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Mintz Y, Horgan S, Cullen J, Falor E, Talamini MA. Dual-lumen natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES): a new method for performing a safe anastomosis. Surg Endosc 2008; 22 (02) 348-351
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Katsarelias D, Polydorou A, Tsaroucha A. , et al. Endoloop application as an alternative method for gastrotomy closure in experimental transgastric surgery. Surg Endosc 2007; 21 (10) 1862-1865
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Ryou M, Pai RD, Sauer JS, Rattner DW, Thompson CC. Evaluating an optimal gastric closure method for transgastric surgery. Surg Endosc 2007; 21 (04) 677-680
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 De la, Mora JG, Rajan E, Rea D. In-vivo full thickness endoluminal gastroplication using tissue anchors in a live pig model. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 61 (05) 223
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Leven J, Burschka D, Kumar R. , et al. DaVinci canvas: a telerobotic surgical system with integrated, robot-assisted, laparoscopic ultrasound capability. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 2005; 8 (Pt 1): 811-818
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Su LM, Vagvolgyi BP, Agarwal R, Reiley CE, Taylor RH, Hager GD. Augmented reality during robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: toward real-time 3D-CT to stereoscopic video registration. Urology 2009; 73 (04) 896-900
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Hostettler A, George D, Rémond Y, Nicolau SA, Soler L, Marescaux J. Bulk modulus and volume variation measurement of the liver and the kidneys in vivo using abdominal kinetics during free breathing. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2010; 100 (02) 149-157
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Kang X, Azizian M, Wilson E. , et al. Stereoscopic augmented reality for laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 2014; 28 (07) 2227-2235
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar