Am J Perinatol 2018; 35(07): 643-647
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1608875
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Nasogastric Feeding Tubes May Not Contribute to Gastroesophageal Reflux in Preterm Infants

Swati V. Murthy
1   Department of Neonatology, Thomas Jefferson University, Nemours, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
,
Apryle Funderburk
2   Pediatrix Medical Group, Columbia, South Carolina
,
Sheeja Abraham
3   Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Thomas Jefferson University, Nemours, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
,
Michele Epstein
1   Department of Neonatology, Thomas Jefferson University, Nemours, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
,
Joan DiPalma
3   Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Thomas Jefferson University, Nemours, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
,
Zubair H. Aghai
1   Department of Neonatology, Thomas Jefferson University, Nemours, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
› Institutsangaben
Funding This study was supported by the Institutional Development Award (IDeA) (Aghai) from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under grant number U54-GM104941 (PI: Binder-Macleod) and NIH COBRE P30GM114736 (PI: Thomas H. Shaffer).
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

01. August 2017

21. Oktober 2017

Publikationsdatum:
30. November 2017 (online)

Abstract

Objective The objective was to determine if the presence of a nasogastric (NG) feeding tube is associated with increased gastroesophageal reflux (GER) and acid exposure in preterm infants.

Study Design This is a retrospective study on preterm infants [gestational age (GA) <37 weeks] who were evaluated by multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH monitoring (MII-pH) between October 2009 and March 2016. Infants were divided into two groups, NG tube present and no feeding tube. GER events per hour and the percent of time with pH <4 during a 24-hour period were then compared.

Results Eighty-three infants were included, 41 had an NG tube present and 42 did not. The group without an NG tube had significantly more reflux events per hour (2.3 ± 2.9 vs. 1.3 ± 0.8, p < 0.05) even after adjusting for differences in birth weight, GA, corrected GA, and total fluid intake. There was no significant difference in acidic events per hour and acid exposure time between the two groups.

Conclusion The presence of a 5-French NG tube is not associated with an increase in GER or acid exposure in preterm infants. In fact, it appears that infants fed through an NG tube have fewer episodes of GER.

 
  • References

  • 1 Farhath S, He Z, Nakhla T. , et al. Pepsin, a marker of gastric contents, is increased in tracheal aspirates from preterm infants who develop bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Pediatrics 2008; 121 (02) e253-e259
  • 2 Ferlauto JJ, Walker MW, Martin MS. Clinically significant gastroesophageal reflux in the at-risk premature neonate: relation to cognitive scores, days in the NICU, and total hospital charges. J Perinatol 1998; 18 (6 Pt 1): 455-459
  • 3 Frakaloss G, Burke G, Sanders MR. Impact of gastroesophageal reflux on growth and hospital stay in premature infants. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1998; 26 (02) 146-150
  • 4 Grant L, Cochran D. Can pH monitoring reliably detect gastro-oesophageal reflux in preterm infants?. Archives of disease in childhood Fetal and neonatal edition 2001; 85 (03) F155-157 ; discussion F157–158
  • 5 Corvaglia L, Rotatori R, Ferlini M, Aceti A, Ancora G, Faldella G. The effect of body positioning on gastroesophageal reflux in premature infants: evaluation by combined impedance and pH monitoring. J Pediatr 2007; 151 (06) 591-596
  • 6 Omari TI, Barnett CP, Benninga MA. , et al. Mechanisms of gastro-oesophageal reflux in preterm and term infants with reflux disease. Gut 2002; 51 (04) 475-479
  • 7 Peter CS, Wiechers C, Bohnhorst B, Silny J, Poets CF. Influence of nasogastric tubes on gastroesophageal reflux in preterm infants: a multiple intraluminal impedance study. J Pediatr 2002; 141 (02) 277-279
  • 8 Noviski N, Yehuda YB, Serour F, Gorenstein A, Mandelberg A. Does the size of nasogastric tubes affect gastroesophageal reflux in children?. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1999; 29 (04) 448-451
  • 9 Dotson RG, Robinson RG, Pingleton SK. Gastroesophageal reflux with nasogastric tubes. Effect of nasogastric tube size. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1994; 149 (06) 1659-1662
  • 10 Kuo B, Castell DO. The effect of nasogastric intubation on gastroesophageal reflux: a comparison of different tube sizes. Am J Gastroenterol 1995; 90 (10) 1804-1807
  • 11 Nobile S, Noviello C, Cobellis G, Carnielli VP. Are infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia prone to gastroesophageal reflux? A prospective observational study with esophageal pH-impedance monitoring. J Pediatr 2015; 167 (02) 279-285.e1
  • 12 Del Buono R, Wenzl TG, Rawat D, Thomson M. Acid and nonacid gastro-oesophageal reflux in neurologically impaired children: investigation with the multiple intraluminal impedance procedure. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2006; 43 (03) 331-335
  • 13 Jadcherla SR, Chan CY, Moore R, Malkar M, Timan CJ, Valentine CJ. Impact of feeding strategies on the frequency and clearance of acid and nonacid gastroesophageal reflux events in dysphagic neonates. J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2012; 36 (04) 449-455
  • 14 Castell DO. Nasogastric tubes permit reflux and aspiration: is there any evidence?. Ann Intern Med 2000; 132 (07) 594-595
  • 15 López-Alonso M, Moya MJ, Cabo JA, Ribas J, del Carmen Macías M, Silny J, Sifrim D. Twenty-four-hour esophageal impedance-pH monitoring in healthy preterm neonates: rate and characteristics of acid, weakly acidic, and weakly alkaline gastroesophageal reflux. Pediatrics 2006; 118 (02) e299-e308