Skull Base Reconstruction in the Pediatric Patient

Abstract

Introduction Pediatric skull base and craniofacial reconstruction presents a unique challenge since the potential benefits of therapy must be balanced against the cumulative impact of multimodality treatment on craniofacial growth, donor-site morbidity, and the potential for serious psychosocial issues.

Objectives To suggest an algorithm for skull base reconstruction in children and adolescents after tumor resection.

Materials and Methods Comprehensive literature review and summary of our experience.

Results We advocate soft-tissue reconstruction as the primary technique, reserving bony flaps for definitive procedures in survivors who have reached skeletal maturity. Free soft-tissue transfer in microvascular technique is the mainstay for reconstruction of large, three-dimensional defects, involving more than one anatomic region of the skull base, as well as defects involving an irradiated field. However, to reduce total operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, and donor-site morbidity, locoregional flaps are better be considered the flap of first choice for skull base reconstruction in children and adolescents, as long as the flap is large enough to cover the defect. Our “workhorse” for dural reconstruction is the double-layer fascia lata. Advances in endoscopic surgery, image guidance, alloplastic grafts, and biomaterials have increased the armamentarium for reconstruction of small and mid-sized defects.

Conclusions Skull base reconstruction using locoregional flaps or free flaps may be safely performed in pediatrics. Although the general principles of skull base reconstruction are applicable to nearly all patients, the unique demands of skull base surgery in pediatrics merit special attention. Multidisciplinary care in experienced centers is of utmost importance.

Keywords

skull base surgery - pediatric oncology - microvascular - free tissue reconstruction - endoscopic - skull base reconstruction

Note

This is an original manuscript reviewed by all authors and not under consideration for publication elsewhere.

• References

• 1 Gil Z, Constantini S, Spektor S. , et al. Skull base approaches in the pediatric population. Head Neck 2005; 27 (08) 682-689
• 2 Moore BA, DeMonte F, Robb GL, Chang DW. Reconstruction of ablative skull base defects in the pediatric population. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 120 (03) 719-727
• 3 Brockmeyer D, Gruber DP, Haller J, Shelton C, Walker ML. Pediatric skull base surgery. 2. Experience and outcomes in 55 patients. Pediatr Neurosurg 2003; 38 (01) 9-15
• 4 Weizman N, Gil Z, Wasserzug O. , et al. Surgical ablation and free flap reconstruction in children with malignant head and neck tumors. Skull Base 2011; 21 (03) 165-170
• 5 Schmalbach CE, Webb DE, Weitzel EK. Anterior skull base reconstruction: a review of current techniques. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2010; 18 (04) 238-243
• 6 Boyle JO, Shah KC, Shah JP. Craniofacial resection for malignant neoplasms of the skull base: an overview. J Surg Oncol 1998; 69 (04) 275-284
• 7 Gruber DP, Brockmeyer D. Pediatric skull base surgery. 1. Embryology and developmental anatomy. Pediatr Neurosurg 2003; 38 (01) 2-8
• 8 Irish JC, Gullane PJ, Gentili F. , et al. Tumors of the skull base: outcome and survival analysis of 77 cases. Head Neck 1994; 16 (01) 3-10
• 9 Demonte F, Moore BA, Chang DW. Skull base reconstruction in the pediatric patient. Skull Base 2007; 17 (01) 39-51
• 10 Nameki H, Kato T, Nameki I, Ajimi Y. Selective reconstructive options for the anterior skull base. Int J Clin Oncol 2005; 10 (04) 223-228
• 11 Gil Z, Abergel A, Leider-Trejo L. , et al. A comprehensive algorithm for anterior skull base reconstruction after oncological resections. Skull Base 2007; 17 (01) 25-37
• 12 Patel A, Otterburn D, Saadeh P, Levine J, Hirsch DL. 3D volume assessment techniques and computer-aided design and manufacturing for preoperative fabrication of implants in head and neck reconstruction. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2011; 19 (04) 683-709 , ix ix.
• 13 Reiser V, Alterman M, Shuster A. , et al. V-stand--a versatile surgical platform for oromandibular reconstruction using a 3-dimensional virtual modeling system. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2015; 73 (06) 1211-1226
• 14 Bernal-Sprekelsen M, Rioja E, Enseñat J. , et al. Management of anterior skull base defect depending on its size and location. BioMed Res Int 2014; 2014: 346873
• 15 Soudry E, Turner JH, Nayak JV, Hwang PH. Endoscopic reconstruction of surgically created skull base defects: a systematic review. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2014; 150 (05) 730-738
• 16 Zuniga MG, Turner JH, Chandra RK. Updates in anterior skull base reconstruction. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2016; 24 (01) 75-82
• 17 Pang D, Tse HH, Zwienenberg-Lee M, Smith M, Zovickian J. The combined use of hydroxyapatite and bioresorbable plates to repair cranial defects in children. J Neurosurg 2005; 102 (1, Suppl) 36-43
• 18 Lin AY, Kinsella Jr CR, Rottgers SA. , et al. Custom porous polyethylene implants for large-scale pediatric skull reconstruction: early outcomes. J Craniofac Surg 2012; 23 (01) 67-70
• 19 Brevi BC, Magri AS, Toma L, Sesenna E. Cranioplasty for repair of a large bone defect with autologous and homologous bone in children. J Pediatr Surg 2010; 45 (04) E17-E20
• 20 Wolfe SA. The utility of pericranial flaps. Ann Plast Surg 1978; 1 (02) 147-153
• 21 Gil Z, Fliss DM. Pericranial wrapping of the frontal bone after anterior skull base tumor resection. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 116 (02) 395-398 , discussion 399
• 22 Gullane PJ, Lipa JE, Novak CB, Neligan PC. Reconstruction of skull base defects. Clin Plast Surg 2005; 32 (03) 391-399 , vii
• 23 Kassam A, Thomas AJ, Snyderman C. , et al. Fully endoscopic expanded endonasal approach treating skull base lesions in pediatric patients. J Neurosurg 2007; 106 (2, Suppl) 75-86
• 24 Shah RN, Surowitz JB, Patel MR. , et al. Endoscopic pedicled nasoseptal flap reconstruction for pediatric skull base defects. Laryngoscope 2009; 119 (06) 1067-1075
• 25 Hadad G, Bassagasteguy L, Carrau RL. , et al. A novel reconstructive technique after endoscopic expanded endonasal approaches: vascular pedicle nasoseptal flap. Laryngoscope 2006; 116 (10) 1882-1886
• 26 Kassam AB, Thomas A, Carrau RL. , et al. Endoscopic reconstruction of the cranial base using a pedicled nasoseptal flap. Neurosurgery 2008; 63 (01) (Suppl. 01) ONS44-ONS52 , discussion ONS52–ONS53
• 27 Ghosh A, Hatten K, Learned KO. , et al. Pediatric nasoseptal flap reconstruction for suprasellar approaches. Laryngoscope 2015; 125 (11) 2451-2456
• 28 Purcell PL, Shinn JR, Otto RK, Davis GE, Parikh SR. Nasoseptal flap reconstruction of pediatric sellar defects: a radiographic feasibility study and case series. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2015; 152 (04) 746-751
• 29 Prevedello DM, Barges-Coll J, Fernandez-Miranda JC. , et al. Middle turbinate flap for skull base reconstruction: cadaveric feasibility study. Laryngoscope 2009; 119 (11) 2094-2098
• 30 Yano T, Tanaka K, Kishimoto S, Iida H, Okazaki M. Review of skull base reconstruction using locoregional flaps and free flaps in children and adolescents. Skull Base 2011; 21 (06) 359-364
• 31 Gil Z, Patel SG, Cantu G. , et al; International Collaborative Study Group. Outcome of craniofacial surgery in children and adolescents with malignant tumors involving the skull base: an international collaborative study. Head Neck 2009; 31 (03) 308-317
• 32 Shlomi B, Chaushu S, Gil Z, Chaushu G, Fliss DM. Effects of the subcranial approach on facial growth and development. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007; 136 (01) 27-32
• 33 Carty MJ, Ferraro N, Upton J. Reconstruction of pediatric cranial base defects: a review of a single microsurgeon's 30-year experience. J Craniofac Surg 2009; 20 (Suppl. 01) 639-645
• 34 Gil Z, Abergel A, Spektor S. , et al. Quality of life following surgery for anterior skull base tumors. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003; 129 (12) 1303-1309