Nervenheilkunde 2009; 28(11): 789-796
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1627161
Fortbildung
Schattauer GmbH

Schlaganfallprävention aus praktisch klinischer Sicht

Prevention of stroke for clinical purposes
K.-H. Grotemeyer
1   Neurologische Klinik, Klinikum Saarbrücken
,
K. C. Grotemeyer
1   Neurologische Klinik, Klinikum Saarbrücken
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Eingegangen am: 04 April 2009

angenommen am: 10 April 2009

Publication Date:
20 January 2018 (online)

Zusammenfassung

Der Arzt steht oft vor dem Problem, dass er weiß, was die Leitlinien der DGN zur Sekundärprophylaxe des Schlaganfalles sagen. Nur muss der Arzt einen Patienten, den er z. B. nie in eine Studie hätte aufnehmen können, behandeln. Hierzu bedarf es eines Pragmatismus, der die Kosten für das System, aber vor allem die individuelle Situation des Patienten berücksichtigen muss. Hinzu kommt, dass Studien Fragen offen lassen. Für die Wahl des Aggregationshemmers ist die individuelle Situation des Patienten wichtig. Blutdrucksenkung bei Patienten, die zu wenig Flüssigkeit aufnehmen, muss hinterfragt werden. 24-Stunden- Blutdruckmessungen sollten zur Beurteilungsbasis werden, um nächtliche Blutdruckabfälle nicht zu übersehen. Lipidsenker sind statistisch zwar bei älteren Patienten in der Hirninfarktprophylaxe wirksam, dürften aber kaum die erste und wichtigste Maßnahme darstellen. Wichtig ist bei allen medikamentös möglichen Einzeleffekten die Machbarkeit in der Praxis, z. B. die Gesamtmenge der verordneten Medikamente im Auge zu behalten.

Summary

The physician knows the guidelines from the German Neurology Society (DGN) for the prevention of a second stroke. However, for the treatment of a patient pragmatism is necessary and the costs for the system have to be regarded. Furthermore, clinical studies can leave unanswered questions. For the choice of the aggregation inhibitor the individual situation of the patient should be regarded. Blood pressure has to be observed and regulated. Lipid-lowering agents are effective for elderly patients as prevention, but not as first choice treatment. For every medical treatment, practical and clinical usefulness should be regarded.

 
  • Literatur

  • 1 Adams JR. et al. Update to the AHA/ASA recommendations for the prevention of stroke in patients with stroke and transient ischemic attack. Stroke 2008; 39: 1647-52.
  • 2 Amarenco P. et al. The stroke prevention by aggressive reduction in cholesterol levels (SPARCL) investigators. High-dose atorvastatin after stroke or transient ischemic attack. N Engl J Med 2006; 355: 549-59.
  • 3 Aguilar M. et al. Effect of anticoagulation versus antiplatelet therapy on ischemic stroke (fatal and non fatal). Stroke 2008; 39: 1399-400.
  • 4 Albers GW. et al. Antithrombotic and thrombolytic therapy for ischemic stroke. Chest 1998; 114: 683S-698S.
  • 5 Bauersachs RM. et al. Überbrückung der oralen Antikoagulation bei interventionellen Eingriffen. Dtsch Ärztebl 2007; 104 (Suppl. 18) A1237.
  • 6 Belch J. et al. Benefit of oral anticoagulant over antiplatelet therapy in a trial fibrillation depends on the quality of international normalize ratio control achieved by centers and countries as measured by time in therapeutic range. Circulation 2008; 118: 2029-37.
  • 7 Bhatt DL. et al. Amplified benefit of clopidogrel versus aspirin in patients with diabetes mellitus. Am J Cardiology 2002; 90: 625-8.
  • 8 Bhatt DL. et al. Clopidogrel and aspirin versus aspirin alone for the prevention of a therothrombotic events. N Engl J Med 2006; 354: 1706-17.
  • 9 Bousser MG. et al. “AICLA” controlled trial of aspirin and dipyridamole in the secondary prevention of athero-thrombotic cerebral ischemia. Stroke 1983; 14 (Suppl. 01) 5-14.
  • 10 CAPRIE Steering Committee.. A randomized, blinded, trial of clopidogrel versus aspirin in patients at risk of ischaemic events. Lancet 1996; 348: 1329-39.
  • 11 Chan F. et al. Clopidogrel versus aspirin and esomeprazole to prevent recurrent ulcer bleeding. N Engl J Med 2005; 352: 238-44.
  • 12 Chaturvedi S. et al. Effect of atorvastatin in elderly patients with a recent stroke or transient ischemic attack. Neurology 2009; 72: 688-94.
  • 13 Dahlöf B. et al. Prevention of cardiovascular events with an antihypertensive regimen of amlodipine adding perindopril as required versus atenolol adding bendroflumethiazide as required, in the Anglo-Scandinavian cardiac outcomes trial-blood pressure lowering arm (ASCOT-BPLA): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2005; 366: 895-906.
  • 14 Diener HC. et al. A European stroke prevention study. 2. Dipyridamole and acetylsalicylic acid in the secondary prevention of stroke. J Neurol Sci 1996; 143 1–2 1-13.
  • 15 Diener HC. et al. Aspirin and clopidogrel compared with clopidogrel alone after recent ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack in high-risk patients (MATCH): randomised, double-blind, placebocontrolled trial. Lancet 2004; 30: 364.
  • 16 Diener HC, Putzki N. (Eds.). Leitlinien für Diagnostik und Therapie in der Neurologie. Stuttgart: Thieme; 2008
  • 17 Derry S, Loke YK. Risk of gastrointestinal haemorrhage with long term use of aspirin: meta-analysis. BMJ 2000; 321: 1183-7.
  • 18 Eikelboom JW. et al. Clopidogrel for high atherothrombotic risk and ischemic stabilization, management and avoidance (CHARISMA) investigators. Incomplete inhibition of thromboxane biosynthesis by acetylsalicylic acid: determinants and effect on cardiovascular risk. Circulation 2008; 118: 1705-12.
  • 19 European Atrial Fibrillation Trial (EAFT) Study Group.. Secondary prevention in non rheumatic atrial fibrillation after transient ischaemic attack or minor stroke. Lancet 1993; 342: 1255-62.
  • 20 Gladstone DJ. et al. Potentially preventable strokes in high-risk patients with a trial fibrillation who are not adequately anticoagulated. Stroke 2009; 40: 235-40.
  • 21 Grotemeyer KH. Effects of acetylsalicylic acid in stroke patients. Evidence of nonresponders in a subpopulation of treated patients. Thromb Res. 1991; 63 (Suppl. 06) 587-93.
  • 22 Grotemeyer KH. et al. Piracetam versus acetylsalicylic acid in secondary stroke prophylaxis. A double-blind, randomized, parallel group, 2 year follow-up study. J Neurol Sci 2000; 181 1–2 65-72.
  • 23 Grotemeyer KH, Auge A. Smoking induces “nonresponse” under ASA and ticlopidine treatment. Stroke 2000; 32: 379.
  • 24 Haunstein KO. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of oral Anticoagulants, especially phenprocoumon. Semin Throm Hemos 1999; 25: 5.
  • 25 Jaenecke J. Antikoagulanzien und Fibrinolysetherapie. Stuttgart: Thieme; 1996
  • 26 Janka HU. Thrombozytenfunktion bei diabetischer Angiopathie. Stuttgart: Thieme; 1983
  • 27 Krasopoulos G. et al. Aspirin “resistance” and risk of cardiovascular morbidity: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2008; 336: 195-8.
  • 28 No author.. High-dose acetylsalicylic acid after cerebral infarction. A Swedish Cooperative Study. Stroke 1987; 18 (Suppl. 02) 325-34.
  • 29 Ogawa H. et al. Low-dose aspirin for primary prevention of atherosclerotic events in patients with type 2 diabetes. A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2008; 300 (Suppl. 18) 2134-41.
  • 30 Pringle S, MacWalter R. Prevention of progression of arterial disease and diabetes Study Group; diabetes registry group; Royal College of Physicians Edinburgh. The prevention of progression of arterial disease and diabetes (POPADAD) trial: factorial randomised placebo controlled trial of aspirin and antioxidants in patients with diabetes and asymptomatic peripheral arterial disease. BMJ 2008; 16: a1840.
  • 31 Ruiz-Nodar JM. et al. Efficacy and safety of drugeluting stent use in patients with atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J 2009; 30 (Suppl. 08) 932-9.
  • 32 Sacco RL. et al. Aspirin and extended-release dipyridamole versus clopidogrel for recurrent stroke. N Engl J Med 2008; 359 (Suppl. 12) 1238-51.
  • 33 Schneider W, Reimers HJ. Morgenstern E Thrombozytenstoffwechsel. In: Berddin H. (Ed.) Prostaglandine und Plättchenfunktion Stuttgart: Schattauer; 1978
  • 34 Schroer K. Acetylsalicylsäure. Stuttgart: Thieme; 1992
  • 35 Sorensen PS. et al. Acetylsalicylic acid in the prevention of stroke in patients with reversible cerebral ischemic attacks. A Danish cooperative study. Stroke 1983; 14 (Suppl. 01) 15-22.
  • 36 Samuelson RM. et al. The cost of stroke prevention. Stroke 2009; 40: e41-e42.
  • 37 The ESPRIT Study Group.. Aspirin plus dipyridamole versus aspirin alone after cerebral ischaemia of arterial origin (ESPRIT): randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2006; 367: 1665-73.
  • 38 The ESPS Group.. The European stroke prevention study (ESPS). Lancet 1987; 1351-1354.
  • 39 Topol E. et al. Randomized, double-blind, placebocontrolled, international trial of the oral IIb/IIIa antagonist lotrafiban in coronary and cerebrovascular disease. Circulation 2003; 108 (Suppl. 04) 399-406.
  • 40 Torn M, Algra A, Rosendaal FR. Oral anticoagulation for cerebral ischemia of arterial origin High initial bleeding risk. Neurology 2001; 5: 1993-9.
  • 41 United Kingdom transient ischaemic attack (UKTIA) aspirin trial: interim results.. UK-TIA Study Group. Br Med J 1988; 296: 316-20.
  • 42 Wadelius M. et al. The largest prospective warfarintreated cohort supports genetic forecasting. Blood 2009; 113 (Suppl. 04) 784-92.
  • 43 Weimar C. et al. Systemic risk score evaluation in ischemic stroke patients (SCALA) A prospective cross sectional study in 85 German stroke units. J Neurol 2007; 254: 1562-8.
  • 44 Wennberg R, Zimmermann C. The PROGRESS trial three years later: time for a balanced report of effectiveness. BMJ 2004; 329: 968-70.
  • 45 Yamamotoa K. et al. Aging and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) regulation: implication in the pathogenesis of thrombotic disorders in the elderly. Cardiovascular Research 2005; 66: 276-85.