Role of Routine Dilatations after Anorectal Reconstruction—Comparison of Two Tertiary Centers

Abstract

Aim Regular anal dilatations are commonly recommended in the postoperative management following posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (PSARP) in anorectal malformations (ARM). We hypothesized that routine postoperative dilatations may not affect surgical outcomes following PSARP. We compare surgical outcomes of routine postoperative dilatations versus no routine postoperative dilatations from two United Kingdom tertiary pediatric surgical centers.

Materials and Methods This is retrospective records review of patients undergoing definitive surgery for ARM in two tertiary surgical centers in the UK over 5 years. Center A used a protocol of routine postoperative dilatations, and center B used a protocol, which used dilatations only for clinical indications of stricture. Data collected included ARM type, operative procedures, and postoperative interventions. All post-operative interventions under general anesthesia (GA) were compared between groups.

Results From 2011 to 2015, 49 procedures (46 PSARPs) were performed in center A and 54 (52 PSARPs) in center B. Median follow up period was 31 months (interquartile range [IQR] 18–48). The first postoperative anal calibration under GA was documented for 43 (86%) patients in center A and for 42 (78%) patients in center B. Following this, center A followed routine postoperative dilatation (RPD) at home, and center B reserved further dilatations for specific indications. RPD was performed for 100% of patients in center A versus 8% in center B. Further anal dilatations under GA were performed in 19 (38%) children in center A and in 17 (34%) children in center B (p = 0.68). In center A, 10 patients (22%) needed further surgery versus 14 (28%) in center B (p = 0.48).

Conclusion The use of routine postoperative dilatations does not significantly improve surgical outcomes following PSARP in ARM.

Keywords

anorectal malformation - anal dilatation - PSARP

• References

• 1 Rigueros Springford L, Connor MJ, Jones K, Kapetanakis VV, Giuliani S. Prevalence of active long-term problems in patients with anorectal malformations: a systematic review. Dis Colon Rectum 2016; 59 (06) 570-580
• 2 Brisighelli G, Morandi A, Di Cesare A, Leva E. The practice of anal dilations following anorectal reconstruction in patients with anorectal malformations: an international survey. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2016; 26 (06) 500-507
• 3 Peña A, Devries PA. Posterior sagittal anorectoplasty: important technical considerations and new applications. J Pediatr Surg 1982; 17 (06) 796-811
• 4 Menon P, Rao KL. Primary anorectoplasty in females with common anorectal malformations without colostomy. J Pediatr Surg 2007; 42 (06) 1103-1106
• 5 Temple SJ, Shawyer A, Langer JC. Is daily dilatation by parents necessary after surgery for Hirschsprung disease and anorectal malformations?. J Pediatr Surg 2012; 47 (01) 209-212
• 6 Diseth TH, Egeland T, Emblem R. Effects of anal invasive treatment and incontinence on mental health and psychosocial functioning of adolescents with Hirschsprung's disease and low anorectal anomalies. J Pediatr Surg 1998; 33 (03) 468-475
• 7 Jenetzky E, Reckin S, Schmiedeke E. , et al. Practice of dilatation after surgical correction in anorectal malformations. Pediatr Surg Int 2012; 28 (11) 1095-1099
• 8 Peña A, Grasshoff S, Levitt M. Reoperations in anorectal malformations. J Pediatr Surg 2007; 42 (02) 318-325
• 9 Rintala RJ, Pakarinen MP. Imperforate anus: long- and short-term outcome. Semin Pediatr Surg 2008; 17 (02) 79-89
• 10 Levitt MA, Peña A. Anorectal malformations. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2007; 2: 33
• 11 Morandi A, Ure B, Leva E, Lacher M. Survey on the management of anorectal malformations (ARM) in European pediatric surgical centers of excellence. Pediatr Surg Int 2015; 31 (06) 543-550
• 12 Diseth TH. Dissociation following traumatic medical treatment procedures in childhood: a longitudinal follow-up. Dev Psychopathol 2006; 18 (01) 233-251