Four tabular and two graphical techniques for the presentation of laboratory test
results were evaluated in a reaction time experiment with 25 volunteers. Artificial
variables and values were used to represent sets of 12 laboratory tests to eliminate
the possible effects of clinical experience. Analyses focused on four types of errors
in interpretation. Color-coded tables and one of the color-coded graphs greatly (2.8
times or better) reduced the number of incorrectly classified test results, as compared
to the reference presentation technique. This was mainly due to a reduction of the
number of abnormal test results that were not noticed by the subjects when using these
presentation techniques.
Keywords:
Clinical Laboratory - Graphical Display - Data Presentation - Data Interpretation
- Evaluation