Abstract
Real-world data are a well-recognized component within the drug lifecycle, and such
data are generated from a range of sources and study designs, including claims databases,
electronic health records, non-interventional studies (NIS) and registries. While
this information can be of vital clinical importance, there may be challenges in understanding
the relevance of the differing study designs, endpoints and populations. Here, we
summarize the value of real-world evidence and considerations pertinent to their use
in clinical research. Owing to the variety of analyses being conducted using real-world
data, it is important for researchers and clinicians to have a clear understanding
of the nature and origin of those data, and to ensure they are valid, reliable and
robust in terms of extrapolating meaningful findings. There are crucial questions
to address when evaluating real-world studies, and we introduce a checklist to meet
these objectives. In addition to advice for appraising data quality and study designs,
several updates will be covered from real-world studies of rivaroxaban for stroke
prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF): the nationwide Danish cohort
study, U.S. Department of Defense Military Health System database, retrospective claim
database study REAFFIRM and a pooled analysis from the global NIS XArelto on preveNtion
of sTroke and non-central nervoUS system systemic embolism in patients with non-valvular
atrial fibrillation (XANTUS). Real-world studies consistently show that rivaroxaban
is an effective treatment option with acceptable safety when used for stroke prevention
in a large number of patients with AF across the globe.
Keywords
non-interventional study - database - registries - rivaroxaban
