Endoscopy 2018; 50(04): S76
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1637252
ESGE Days 2018 oral presentations
21.04.2018 – Stomach: Improving diagnosis
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

INTEROBSERVER AGREEMENT FOR THE PARIS CLASSIFICATION FOR SUPERFICIAL NEOPLASTIC GASTRIC LESIONS AMONG WESTERN ENDOSCOPISTS

H Ribeiro
1   Hospital Amato Lusitano, ULS Castelo Branco, Castelo Branco, Portugal
,
D Libânio
2   Instituto Português de Oncologia do Porto, Porto, Portugal
,
R Castro
2   Instituto Português de Oncologia do Porto, Porto, Portugal
,
A Ferreira
3   Hospital de Braga, Braga, Portugal
,
P Barreiro
4   Hospital Egas Moniz, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Ocidental, Lisboa, Portugal
,
P Boal Carvalho
5   Centro Hospitalar do Alto Ave, Guimarães, Portugal
,
T Capela
4   Hospital Egas Moniz, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Ocidental, Lisboa, Portugal
,
P Pimentel-Nunes
2   Instituto Português de Oncologia do Porto, Porto, Portugal
,
C Santos
6   MEDCIDS/Porto Faculty of Medicine, Porto, Portugal
,
M Dinis-Ribeiro
2   Instituto Português de Oncologia do Porto, Porto, Portugal
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
27 March 2018 (online)

 

Aims:

Paris Classification is used to classify gastrointestinal superficial neoplastic lesions and also to estimate submucosal invasion. We aimed to evaluate the interobserver agreement for this classification among westerns endoscopists.

Methods:

A total of 54 superficial gastric lesions were independently classified according to Paris classification by 8 endoscopists. Observers were asked to classify 2 sets of images – first, obtained with high resolution white light (HR-WL) endoscopy and second, with the same HR-WL images paired with images obtained with high resolution Narrow Band Imaging (HR-NBI) – HR-WL+ NBI image group.

Results:

The overall interobserver agreement when asked to classify in I, II or III was good both using HR-WL images and HR-WL + NBI images (wK of 0.65 and 0.70, respectively). The proportion of agreement for type III lesions was 0.48 for HR-WL images increasing significantly to 0.74 in the HR-WL+NBI group. The interobserver agreement for the identification of a IIc component was only moderate (wK 0,47) and did not improve with HR-NBI namely for experts and beginners, whereas it increased for trainees (from 0.19 to 0.47). The observers had higher specificity than sensitivity in predicting submucosal invasion and with HR-NBI images the sensitivity improved among the less experienced endoscopists.

Conclusions:

Overall, the reliability of Paris classification is moderate to good. Both training and the use of technology such as NBI may improve both reliability and accuracy.