CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Laryngorhinootologie 2018; 97(S 02): S41
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1639856
Poster
Chirurgische Assistenzverfahren: Surgical assistant's procedures

Higher tensile strength of scars after incision with the picosecond infrared laser (PIRL) – a wound-healing study on rat skin

A Gliese
1   Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, HNO-Klinik, Hamburg
,
F Schmidt
2   Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Institut für Osteologie und Biomechanik, Hamburg
,
A Münscher
1   Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, HNO-Klinik, Hamburg
,
H Petersen
1   Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, HNO-Klinik, Hamburg
› Author Affiliations
 

Introduction:

In the context of wound healing, original tissue is replaced with dysfunctional scar tissue, whereby the quality of scar tissue is influenced by the choice of the surgical instrument. Incision with the PIRL results in less scar tissue due to less tissue damage compared to conventional instruments such as scalpel or electrosurgical device. The aim of this study was to investigate the tensile strength of scars caused by PIRL.

Methods:

With the PIRL, the scalpel and the electrosurgical device 1 cm long skin incisions were made on the back of rats and sutured primarily. After 3 months, the scars were excised. Using a tensile/compression testing machine, the force (N) necessary for rupturing the scar was measured and converted into tension (N/mm2). 11 PIRL scars, 10 scalpel scars and 12 electrosurgical scars were used. 6 untreated skin samples served as control samples. The statistical evaluation was carried out by least significant difference test at a significance level of 0.05.

Results:

To rupture a PIRL scar an average tension of 2.00 ± 0.38 N/mm2 is required, for a scalpel scar 1.29 ± 0.32 N/mm2 are necessary and for an electrosurgical scar 1.20 ± 0, 35 N/mm2 (control: 9.87 ± 1.88 N/mm2). The tensile strength of PIRL scars was significantly (p < 0.05) higher compared to the tensile strength of scalpel and electrosurgical scars.

Conclusion:

The present study has shown that PIRL scars have a higher tensile strength than scalpel or electrosurgical scars. The results support the hypothesis of better wound healing following incision with the PIRL compared to conventional instruments.



Publication History

Publication Date:
18 April 2018 (online)

© 2018. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Stuttgart · New York