CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Revista Argentina de Radiología / Argentinian Journal of Radiology 2018; 82(03): 107-113
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1667126
Original Article | Artículo Original
Sociedad Argentina de Radiología. Publicado por Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Complicaciones vasculares durante la trombectomía mecánica en el ictus agudo, una experiencia multicéntrica en España

Vascular Complications during Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute Stroke, a Multicentric Experience in Spain
Fernando Meléndez
1   Servicio de Neurointervencionismo, Hospital Vall D'Hebron, Barcelona, España
,
Alejandro Tomasello
1   Servicio de Neurointervencionismo, Hospital Vall D'Hebron, Barcelona, España
,
David Hernández
1   Servicio de Neurointervencionismo, Hospital Vall D'Hebron, Barcelona, España
,
Lavinia Dinia
1   Servicio de Neurointervencionismo, Hospital Vall D'Hebron, Barcelona, España
,
Pilar Coscojuela
1   Servicio de Neurointervencionismo, Hospital Vall D'Hebron, Barcelona, España
,
Marc Ribó
1   Servicio de Neurointervencionismo, Hospital Vall D'Hebron, Barcelona, España
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

19 January 2018

17 June 2018

Publication Date:
18 July 2018 (online)

Resumen

Objetivo Determinar la frecuencia de las complicaciones observadas durante la trombectomía en el ictus isquémico agudo.

Materiales y Métodos Se revisó de forma retrospectiva las trombectomías realizadas en nuestra institución cuando los ictus isquémicos tuvieron una indicación de tratamiento endovascular. Se registraron los diferentes dispositivos utilizados en ese periodo de tiempo y si presentaron relación con el desarrollo de las complicaciones inmediatas mediante arteriografía.

Resultados De un total de 228 casos, se registraron complicaciones en el 16,6% de los casos. Se identificaron embolias (n = 31), hemorragias subaracnoideas (n = 2), hemorragia gangliobasal (n = 1), vasoespasmo (n = 1), disección (n = 1) y peusoaneurismas (n = 2). La embolia a nuevos territorios se presentó solo en 5 casos.

Discusión El tratamiento endovascular ha demostrado ser efectivo para la recanalización en oclusión de gran vaso. El uso de dispositivos presume un riesgo por la manipulación de los vasos.

Conclusión La embolia fue la complicación más frecuente. El tratamiento endovascular en el ictus genera un desenlace clínico favorable de los pacientes, al mismo tiempo, el bajo porcentaje de complicaciones que encontramos no suponen una afectación negativa en el desenlace final.

Abstract

Purpose To determine the complications we observed during thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke.

Materials and Methods We reviewed retrospectively thrombectomies performed in our institution when endovascular treatment for stroke was done. The different devices used in this period of time were recorded and we determined if these were related to the development of immediate complications during the procedure visualized in arteriography.

Results We had 228 cases, complications were found in 16.6% of the cases. Embolisms (n = 31), subarachnoid hemorrhages (n = 2), gangliobasal hemorrhage (n = 1), vasospasm (n = 1), dissection (n = 1) and peusoaneurysms (n = 2) were identified. 5 embolisms happened to new territories during thrombectomy.

Discussion Endovascular treatment has been shown to be effective for recanalization in large vessel occlusion. The use of devices presumes a risk for the manipulation of the vessels.

Conclusion Embolism was the most frequent complication. The endovascular treatment in the acute stroke produces a favorable clinical outcome of the patients and we found a low percentage of complications that would not suppose a negative affectation in the final outcome.

Responsabilidades Éticas

Protección de personas y animales. Los autores declaran que para esta investigación no se han realizado experimentos en seres humanos ni en animales.


Confidencialidad de los datos. Los autores declaran que han seguido los protocolos de su centro de trabajo sobre la publicación de datos de pacientes.


Derecho a la privacidad y consentimiento informado. Los autores declaran que en este artículo no aparecen datos de pacientes.


 
  • Bibliografía

  • 1 Goyal M, Demchuk AM, Menon BK. , et al; ESCAPE Trial Investigators. Randomized assessment of rapid endovascular treatment of ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2015; 372 (11) 1019-1030
  • 2 Campbell BCV, Mitchell PJ, Kleinig TJ. , et al; EXTEND-IA Investigators. Endovascular therapy for ischemic stroke with perfusion-imaging selection. N Engl J Med 2015; 372 (11) 1009-1018
  • 3 Berkhemer OA, Fransen PS, Beumer D. , et al; MR CLEAN Investigators. A randomized trial of intraarterial treatment for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2015; 372 (01) 11-20
  • 4 Saver JL, Goyal M, Bonafe A. , et al; SWIFT PRIME Investigators. Stent-retriever thrombectomy after intravenous t-PA vs. t-PA alone in stroke. N Engl J Med 2015; 372 (24) 2285-2295
  • 5 Jovin TG, Chamorro A, Cobo E. , et al; REVASCAT Trial Investigators. Thrombectomy within 8 hours after symptom onset in ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2015; 372 (24) 2296-2306
  • 6 Turk AS, Spiotta A, Frei D. , et al. Initial clinical experience with the ADAPT technique: a direct aspiration first pass technique for stroke thrombectomy. J Neurointerv Surg 2014; 6 (03) 231-237
  • 7 Jankowitz B, Grandhi R, Horev A. , et al. Primary manual aspiration thrombectomy (MAT) for acute ischemic stroke: safety, feasibility and outcomes in 112 consecutive patients. J Neurointerv Surg 2015; 7 (01) 27-31
  • 8 Humphries W, Hoit D, Doss VT. , et al. Distal aspiration with retrievable stent assisted thrombectomy for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke. J Neurointerv Surg 2015; 7 (02) 90-94
  • 9 Lee JS, Hong JM, Lee SJ, Joo IS, Lim YC, Kim SY. The combined use of mechanical thrombectomy devices is feasible for treating acute carotid terminus occlusion. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2013; 155 (04) 635-641
  • 10 Hussain SI, Zaidat OO, Fitzsimmons BF. The Penumbra system for mechanical thrombectomy in endovascular acute ischemic stroke therapy. Neurology 2012; 79 (13) (Suppl. 01) S135-S141
  • 11 Saver JL, Jahan R, Levy EI. , et al; SWIFT Trialists. Solitaire flow restoration device versus the Merci Retriever in patients with acute ischaemic stroke (SWIFT): a randomised, parallel-group, non-inferiority trial. Lancet 2012; 380 (9849): 1241-1249
  • 12 Pereira VM, Gralla J, Davalos A. , et al. Prospective, multicenter, single-arm study of mechanical thrombectomy using Solitaire Flow Restoration in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2013; 44 (10) 2802-2807
  • 13 Turk AS, Turner R, Spiotta A. , et al. Comparison of endovascular treatment approaches for acute ischemic stroke: cost effectiveness, technical success, and clinical outcomes. J Neurointerv Surg 2015; 7 (09) 666-670
  • 14 Lapergue B, Blanc R, Guedin P. , et al. A Direct Aspiration, First Pass Technique (ADAPT) versus Stent Retrievers for Acute Stroke Therapy: An Observational Comparative Study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016; [Epub ahead of print]
  • 15 Akins PT, Amar AP, Pakbaz RS, Fields JD. ; SWIFT Investigators. Complications of endovascular treatment for acute stroke in the SWIFT trial with solitaire and Merci devices. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014; 35 (03) 524-528
  • 16 Nogueira RG, Lutsep HL, Gupta R. , et al; TREVO 2 Trialists. Trevo versus Merci retrievers for thrombectomy revascularisation of large vessel occlusions in acute ischaemic stroke (TREVO 2): a randomised trial. Lancet 2012; 380 (9849): 1231-1240
  • 17 Zaidat OO, Castonguay AC, Gupta R. , et al. North American Solitaire Stent Retriever Acute Stroke registry: post-marketing revascularization and clinical outcome results. J Neurointerv Surg 2014; 6 (08) 584-588
  • 18 Broderick JP, Palesch YY, Demchuk AM. , et al; Interventional Management of Stroke (IMS) III Investigators. Endovascular therapy after intravenous t-PA versus t-PA alone for stroke. N Engl J Med 2013; 368 (10) 893-903
  • 19 Mokin M, Dumont TM, Veznedaroglu E. , et al. Solitaire Flow Restoration thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: retrospective multicenter analysis of early postmarket experience after FDA approval. Neurosurgery 2013; 73 (01) 19-25 , discussion 25–26
  • 20 Soize S, Barbe C, Kadziolka K, Estrade L, Serre I, Pierot L. Predictive factors of outcome and hemorrhage after acute ischemic stroke treated by mechanical thrombectomy with a stent-retriever. Neuroradiology 2013; 55 (08) 977-987
  • 21 Gascou G, Lobotesis K, Machi P. , et al. Stent retrievers in acute ischemic stroke: complications and failures during the perioperative period. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014; 35 (04) 734-740
  • 22 Soize S, Barbe C, Kadziolka K, Estrade L, Serre I, Pierot L. Predictive factors of outcome and hemorrhage after acute ischemic stroke treated by mechanical thrombectomy with a stent-retriever. Neuroradiology 2013; 55 (08) 977-987
  • 23 Gratz PP, Jung S, Schroth G. , et al. Outcome of standard and high-risk patients with acute anterior circulation stroke after stent retriever thrombectomy. Stroke 2014; 45 (01) 152-158
  • 24 Berger C, Fiorelli M, Steiner T. , et al. Hemorrhagic transformation of ischemic brain tissue: asymptomatic or symptomatic?. Stroke 2001; 32 (06) 1330-1335
  • 25 Darkhabani Z, Nguyen T, Lazzaro MA. , et al. Complications of endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke and proposed management approach. Neurology 2012; 79 (13) (Suppl. 01) S192-S198
  • 26 Soize S, Kadziolka K, Estrade L, Serre I, Bakchine S, Pierot L. Mechanical thrombectomy in acute stroke: prospective pilot trial of the solitaire FR device while under conscious sedation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013; 34 (02) 360-365
  • 27 Schulz-Schüpke S, Helde S, Gewalt S. , et al; Instrumental Sealing of Arterial Puncture Site—CLOSURE Device vs Manual Compression (ISAR-CLOSURE) Trial Investigators. Comparison of vascular closure devices vs manual compression after femoral artery puncture: the ISAR-CLOSURE randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2014; 312 (19) 1981-1987
  • 28 Smilowitz NR, Kirtane AJ, Guiry M. , et al. Practices and complications of vascular closure devices and manual compression in patients undergoing elective transfemoral coronary procedures. Am J Cardiol 2012; 110 (02) 177-182
  • 29 Ahmed B, Piper WD, Malenka D. , et al. Significantly improved vascular complications among women undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a report from the Northern New England Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Registry. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2009; 2 (05) 423-429
  • 30 Doyle BJ, Ting HH, Bell MR. , et al. Major femoral bleeding complications after percutaneous coronary intervention: incidence, predictors, and impact on long-term survival among 17,901 patients treated at the Mayo Clinic from 1994 to 2005. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2008; 1 (02) 202-209
  • 31 Trimarchi S, Smith DE, Share D. , et al; BMC2 Registry. Retroperitoneal hematoma after percutaneous coronary intervention: prevalence, risk factors, management, outcomes, and predictors of mortality: a report from the BMC2 (Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium) registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2010; 3 (08) 845-850