Robotic Transthoracic Esophagectomy in High-Volume Centers: Improving Outcome and Extending Indications

Richard van Hillegersberg

doi:10.1055/s-0038-1667352

The Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon, Inhaltsverzeichnis

Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2018; 66(05): 360-361
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1667352

Editorial

Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Robotic Transthoracic Esophagectomy in High-Volume Centers: Improving Outcome and Extending Indications

Richard van Hillegersberg

¹Division of Surgery, Department of Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands

› Institutsangaben

Abstract

Alle Artikel dieser Rubrik

Volltext

Referenzen

References
1 Henneman D, Dikken JL, Putter H. , et al. Centralization of esophagectomy: how far should we go?. Ann Surg Onco 2014; 21 (13) 4068-4074
2 Ghaferi AA, Birkmeyer JD, Dimick JB. Hospital volume and failure to rescue with high-risk surgery. Med Care 2011; 49 (12) 1076-1081
3 Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland (AUGIS). Guidance on minimum surgeon volumes (2010). http://www.augis.org/augis-guidelines/ . Accessed July 2018
4 Coupland VH, Lagergren J, Lüchtenborg M. , et al. Hospital volume, proportion resected and mortality from oesophageal and gastric cancer: a population-based study in England, 2004-2008. Gut 2013; 62 (07) 961-966
5 Monson JRT, Probst CP, Wexner SD. , et al; Consortium for Optimizing the Treatment of Rectal Cancer (OSTRiCh). Failure of evidence-based cancer care in the United States: the association between rectal cancer treatment, cancer center volume, and geography. Ann Surg 2014; 260 (04) 625-631 , discussion 631–632
6 Koëter M, van Steenbergen LN, Lemmens VEPP. , et al. Hospital of diagnosis and probability to receive a curative treatment for oesophageal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2014; 40 (10) 1338-1345
7 van der Sluis PC, Ruurda JP, van der Horst S, Goense L, van Hillegersberg R. Learning curve for robot-assisted minimally invasive thoracoscopic esophagectomy: results from 312 cases. Ann Thorac Surg 2018; 106 (01) 264-271
8 Visser E, van Rossum PSN, van Veer H. , et al. A structured training program for minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer - a Delphi consensus study in Europe. Dis Esophagus 2017; 31: 1-9 . DOI: 10.1093/dote/dox124
9 Biere SS, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Maas KW. , et al. Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2012; 379 (9829): 1887-1892
10 Sihag S, Kosinski AS, Gaissert HA, Wright CD, Schipper PH. Minimally Invasive versus open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a comparison of early surgical outcomes from The Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database. Ann Thorac Surg 2016; 101 (04) 1281-1288 , discussion 1288–1289
11 Mamidanna R, Bottle A, Aylin P, Faiz O, Hanna GB. Short-term outcomes following open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer in England: a population-based national study. Ann Surg 2012; 255 (02) 197-203
12 Seesing MFJ, Gisbertz SS, Goense L. , et al. A propensity score matched analysis of open versus minimally invasive transthoracic esophagectomy in the Netherlands. Ann Surg 2017; 266 (05) 839-846
13 Grimminger PP, Goense L, Gockel I. , et al. Diagnosis, assessment, and management of surgical complications following esophagectomy. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2018; (e-pub ahead of print)
14 Goense L, van Rossum PSN, Kandioler D. , et al. Stage-directed individualized therapy in esophageal cancer. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2016; 1381 (01) 50-65
15 Timmermans M, Schuurman MS, Ho VKY. , et al. Centralization of ovarian cancer in the Netherlands: hospital of diagnosis no longer determines patients' probability of undergoing surgery. Gynecol Oncol 2018; 148 (01) 56-61