Intramedullary Fixation of Distal Radius Fractures Using CAGE-DR Implant

Schneider K. Rancy; Stephanie D. Malliaris; Eric A. Bogner; Scott W. Wolfe

doi:10.1055/s-0038-1669438

Journal of Wrist Surgery, Table of Contents

J Wrist Surg 2018; 07(05): 358-365
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1669438

Special Review: New Technology for Distal Radius Fracture Treatment

Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Intramedullary Fixation of Distal Radius Fractures Using CAGE-DR Implant

Schneider K. Rancy

¹SUNY Downstate Medical Center, College of Medicine, Brooklyn, New York

,

Stephanie D. Malliaris

²Division of Hand and Upper Extremity Surgery, Denver Health Medical Center, University of Colorado School of Medicine, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, Colorado

,

Eric A. Bogner

³Department of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York

,

Scott W. Wolfe

⁴Division of Hand and Upper Extremity Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York

› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Purpose CAGE-DR implant is a novel Food and Drug Administration approved intramedullary fracture fixation device used for distal radius fractures. We examine a series of 22 patients and report the outcomes with this device.

Materials and Methods A total of 24 patients with distal radius fractures (8 articular AO type C1/C2; 16 extra-articular AO type A2/A3) underwent open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) using CAGE-DR implant by a single surgeon. Data including fracture type, angle of displacement, radiographic consolidation, grip strength, wrist range of motion (ROM), patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE), and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores were recorded at time of surgery and at standard follow-up.

Results All 24 patients underwent uneventful ORIF. At first follow-up visit (9 days), all patients had full digital ROM (measured as 0 cm tip-to-palm distance). Two patients were lost to follow-up. Eighteen of the remaining 22 patients had sufficient radiographic follow-up and all 18 demonstrated healing. At latest follow-up (mean 9.7 months, range, 3–20), VAS pain scores averaged 0.6 (range, 0–8) and PRWE averaged 12.1 (range, 0–53.5). Grip strength of the operated hand averaged 58 lbs (range, 20–130). ROM included: wrist flexion 73° (50–95), wrist extension 78° (60–110), pronation 77° (60–90), supination 79° (60–90), ulnar deviation 31° (5–45), and radial deviation 17° (10–30). Three patients underwent screw removal to prevent tendon irritation. One patient underwent hardware removal due to prominence on imaging but was asymptomatic. There were otherwise no major complications, including complex regional pain syndrome, in the series to date.

Conclusion The CAGE-DR fracture fixation system is a promising alternative to established methods of distal radius internal fixation. This series has a low reported pain score starting immediately postoperatively and a low complication rate. This novel device is a promising option for internal fixation of displaced distal radius fractures with a low complication profile.

Level of Evidence This is a level IV, therapeutic study.

Keywords

Conventus - distal radius fracture - internal fixation - intramedullary fixation - outcomes

Full Text

References

References
1 Wolfe SW. Distal radius fractures: evidence-based decision making. In: Wolfe SW, Hotchkiss RN, Pederson WC, Kozin SH. , eds. Green's Operative Hand Surgery. 6th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Churchill Livingstone; 2011: 613-616
2 Henry MH. Distal radius fractures: current concepts. J Hand Surg Am 2008; 33 (07) 1215-1227
3 Nana AD, Joshi A, Lichtman DM. Plating of the distal radius. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2005; 13 (03) 159-171
4 Arora R, Lutz M, Hennerbichler A, Krappinger D, Espen D, Gabl M. Complications following internal fixation of unstable distal radius fracture with a palmar locking-plate. J Orthop Trauma 2007; 21 (05) 316-322
5 Esenwein P, Sonderegger J, Gruenert J, Ellenrieder B, Tawfik J, Jakubietz M. Complications following palmar plate fixation of distal radius fractures: a review of 665 cases. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2013; 133 (08) 1155-1162
6 Johnson NA, Cutler L, Dias JJ, Ullah AS, Wildin CJ, Bhowal B. Complications after volar locking plate fixation of distal radius fractures. Injury 2014; 45 (03) 528-533
7 Ilyas AM. Intramedullary fixation of distal radius fractures. J Hand Surg Am 2009; 34 (02) 341-346
8 Lerch S, Sextro HG, Wilken F, Wittenberg CE. Clinical and radiological results after distal radius fracture: intramedullary locking nail versus volar locking plate osteosynthesis [in German]. Z Orthop Unfall 2009; 147 (05) 547-552
9 Taras JS, Zambito KL, Abzug JM. T-Pin for distal radius fracture. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg 2006; 10 (01) 2-7
10 Vlček M, Jaganjac E, Pech J, Jonáš D, Kebrle R. Is minimally invasive application by intramedullary osteosynthesis in comparison with volar plating real benefit in the treatment of distal radius fractures?. Bosn J Basic Med Sci 2014; 14 (02) 81-88
11 Sato O, Aoki M, Kawaguchi S, Ishii S, Kondo M. Antegrade intramedullary K-wire fixation for distal radial fractures. J Hand Surg Am 2002; 27 (04) 707-713
12 Hardman J, Al-Hadithy N, Hester T, Anakwe R. Systematic review of outcomes following fixed angle intramedullary fixation of distal radius fractures. Int Orthop 2015; 39 (12) 2381-2387
13 Gradl G, Mielsch N, Wendt M. , et al. Intramedullary nail versus volar plate fixation of extra-articular distal radius fractures. Two year results of a prospective randomized trial. Injury 2014; 45 (Suppl 1): S3-S8
14 Safi A, Hart R, Těknědžjan B, Kozák T. Treatment of extra-articular and simple articular distal radial fractures with intramedullary nail versus volar locking plate. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2013; 38 (07) 774-779
15 van Kampen RJ, Thoreson AR, Knutson NJ, Hale JE, Moran SL. Comparison of a new intramedullary scaffold to volar plating for treatment of distal radius fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2013; 27 (09) 535-541
16 Strassmair MK, Jonas M, Schäfer W, Palmer A. Distal radial fracture management with an intramedullary cage and fragment fixation. J Hand Surg Am 2016; 41 (08) 833-840
17 Kapandji AIEJ. Colles' fractures: treatment by double intra-focal wire fixation. In: Razemon JPFG. , ed. The Wrist. New York: Churchill LIvingstone; 1988: 65-73
18 Waljee JF, Ladd A, MacDermid JC, Rozental TD, Wolfe SW. ; Distal Radius Outcomes Consortium. A unified approach to outcomes assessment for distal radius fractures. J Hand Surg Am 2016; 41 (04) 565-573
19 Dy CJ, Jang E, Taylor SA, Meyers KN, Wolfe SW. The impact of coronal alignment on distal radioulnar joint stability following distal radius fracture. J Hand Surg Am 2014; 39 (07) 1264-1272
20 Trehan SK, Orbay JL, Wolfe SW. Coronal shift of distal radius fractures: influence of the distal interosseous membrane on distal radioulnar joint instability. J Hand Surg Am 2015; 40 (01) 159-162
21 Soong M, Earp BE, Bishop G, Leung A, Blazar P. Volar locking plate implant prominence and flexor tendon rupture. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011; 93 (04) 328-335
22 Kitay A, Swanstrom M, Schreiber JJ. , et al. Volar plate position and flexor tendon rupture following distal radius fracture fixation. J Hand Surg Am 2013; 38 (06) 1091-1096
23 Limthongthang R, Bachoura A, Jacoby SM, Osterman AL. Distal radius volar locking plate design and associated vulnerability of the flexor pollicis longus. J Hand Surg Am 2014; 39 (05) 852-860
24 Sammer DM, Fuller DS, Kim HM, Chung KC. A comparative study of fragment-specific versus volar plate fixation of distal radius fractures. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 122 (05) 1441-1450
25 Landgren M, Abramo A, Geijer M, Kopylov P, Tägil M. Fragment-specific fixation versus volar locking plates in primarily nonreducible or secondarily redisplaced distal radius fractures: a randomized controlled study. J Hand Surg Am 2017; 42 (03) 156-165
26 MacFarlane RJ, Miller D, Wilson L. , et al. Functional outcome and complications at 2.5 years following volar locking plate fixation of distal radius fractures. J Hand Microsurg 2015; 7 (01) 18-24
27 Kumar S, Khan AN, Sonanis SV. Radiographic and functional evaluation of low profile dorsal versus volar plating for distal radius fractures. J Orthop 2016; 13 (04) 376-382
28 Drobetz H, Koval L, Weninger P. , et al. Volar locking distal radius plates show better short-term results than other treatment options: a prospective randomised controlled trial. World J Orthop 2016; 7 (10) 687-694
29 Duncan J, Trzeciak M. Relevant insertion site anatomy of the Conventus distal radius system. Hand (NY) 2018; 13 (03) 341-345