J Knee Surg 2019; 32(10): 989-994
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1675184
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

What Kinds of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Bundles Are Preserved in Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty? A Three-Dimensional Morphology Study

Yoshinori Inou
1   Department of Orthopaedic Biomaterial Science, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan
,
Tetsuya Tomita
1   Department of Orthopaedic Biomaterial Science, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan
,
Dai Kiyotomo
1   Department of Orthopaedic Biomaterial Science, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan
,
Hideki Yoshikawa
2   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan
,
Kazuomi Sugamoto
1   Department of Orthopaedic Biomaterial Science, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

07 May 2018

07 September 2018

Publication Date:
10 November 2018 (online)

Abstract

In this study, the effects of tibial bone cutting on the attachment area of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL), including both the anterolateral bundle (ALB) and posteromedial bundle (PMB), in cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty (CR-TKA) were simulated using a three-dimensional (3D) model of the tibial reconstruction. A total of 40 knees with medial osteoarthritis in patients scheduled for TKA were evaluated. Following surface registration of 3D computed tomography (CT) and 3D magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) models of the tibia with the PCL, the area of PCL attachment was calculated. Tibial bone cutting in the 3D CT model was simulated at 8 and 10 mm distal to the center of the lateral articular surfaces of the tibia and with posterior tibial slope angles of 0, 7, and 10 degrees. The percentages of the ALB and PMB tibial attachment areas that remained after cutting at 8 mm were, respectively, 21.8 ± 19.7% and 86.3 ± 17.7% with 0 degrees, 9.5 ± 10.4% and 64.1 ± 23.6% with 7 degrees, and 8.1 ± 6.7% and 51 ± 25.3% with 10 degrees. These results suggest that only half of the PCL attachment area was left after the bone cut simulation. Complete preservation of the ALB and PMB attachment areas requires appropriate selection of surgical procedures and devices.

 
  • References

  • 1 Mizu-Uchi H, Matsuda S, Miura H, Nabeyama R, Okazaki K, Iwamoto Y. Anteroposterior stability in posterior cruciate ligament-retaining total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2006; 21 (04) 592-598
  • 2 Emodi GJ, Callaghan JJ, Pedersen DR, Brown TD. Posterior cruciate ligament function following total knee arthroplasty: the effect of joint line elevation. Iowa Orthop J 1999; 19: 82-92
  • 3 Sorger JI, Federle D, Kirk PG, Grood E, Cochran J, Levy M. The posterior cruciate ligament in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1997; 12 (08) 869-879
  • 4 Komistek RD, Mahfouz MR, Bertin KC, Rosenberg A, Kennedy W. In vivo determination of total knee arthroplasty kinematics: a multicenter analysis of an asymmetrical posterior cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2008; 23 (01) 41-50
  • 5 Swanik CB, Lephart SM, Rubash HE. Proprioception, kinesthesia, and balance after total knee arthroplasty with cruciate-retaining and posterior stabilized prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004; 86-A (02) 328-334
  • 6 Del Valle ME, Harwin SF, Maestro A, Murcia A, Vega JA. Immunohistochemical analysis of mechanoreceptors in the human posterior cruciate ligament: a demonstration of its proprioceptive role and clinical relevance. J Arthroplasty 1998; 13 (08) 916-922
  • 7 Siston RA, Giori NJ, Goodman SB, Delp SL. Intraoperative passive kinematics of osteoarthritic knees before and after total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Res 2006; 24 (08) 1607-1614
  • 8 Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Mahfouz MR. In vivo fluoroscopic analysis of fixed-bearing total knee replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003; (410) 114-130
  • 9 Rosenberg AG. Posterior cruciate ligament retention in total knee arthroplasty. In: Insall J, Scott W. , eds. Surgery of the Knee. 5th ed. New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone; 2012: 1125-1131
  • 10 Amis AA, Gupte CM, Bull AM, Edwards A. Anatomy of the posterior cruciate ligament and the meniscofemoral ligaments. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2006; 14 (03) 257-263
  • 11 Anderson CJ, Ziegler CG, Wijdicks CA, Engebretsen L, LaPrade RF. Arthroscopically pertinent anatomy of the anterolateral and posteromedial bundles of the posterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012; 94 (21) 1936-1945
  • 12 Tajima G, Nozaki M, Iriuchishima T. , et al. Morphology of the tibial insertion of the posterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009; 91 (04) 859-866
  • 13 Takahashi M, Matsubara T, Doi M, Suzuki D, Nagano A. Anatomical study of the femoral and tibial insertions of the anterolateral and posteromedial bundles of human posterior cruciate ligament. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2006; 14 (11) 1055-1059
  • 14 Edwards A, Bull AM, Amis AA. The attachments of the fiber bundles of the posterior cruciate ligament: an anatomic study. Arthroscopy 2007; 23 (03) 284-290
  • 15 Matziolis G, Mehlhorn S, Schattat N. , et al. How much of the PCL is really preserved during the tibial cut?. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2012; 20 (06) 1083-1086
  • 16 Aoki M, Shishido T, Takahashi Y. , et al. Functional evaluation in cruciate-retaining-type TKA: anatomical relationship between tibial osteotomy level and PCL attachment. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2014; 24 (08) 1531-1537
  • 17 Kawashima K, Tomita T, Tamaki M, Murase T, Yoshikawa H, Sugamoto K. In vivo three-dimensional motion analysis of osteoarthritic knees. Mod Rheumatol 2013; 23 (04) 646-652
  • 18 Kataoka T, Moritomo H, Omokawa S, Iida A, Murase T, Sugamoto K. Ulnar variance: its relationship to ulnar foveal morphology and forearm kinematics. J Hand Surg Am 2012; 37 (04) 729-735
  • 19 Lee YS, Seon JK, Shin VI, Kim GH, Jeon M. Anatomical evaluation of CT-MRI combined femoral model. Biomed Eng Online 2008; 7: 6
  • 20 Aggarwal AK, Goel A, Radotra BD. Predictors of posterior cruciate ligament degeneration in osteoarthritic knees. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2013; 21 (01) 15-18
  • 21 Parker Vail T, Lang JE, Sikes CV. Surgical techniques and instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. In: Insall J, Scott W. , eds. Surgery of the Knee. 5th ed. New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone; 2012: 1042-1099
  • 22 Bellemans J, Robijns F, Duerinckx J, Banks S, Vandenneucker H. The influence of tibial slope on maximal flexion after total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2005; 13 (03) 193-196
  • 23 Wang JH, Kato Y, Ingham SJ. , et al. Effects of knee flexion angle and loading conditions on the end-to-end distance of the posterior cruciate ligament: a comparison of the roles of the anterolateral and posteromedial bundles. Am J Sports Med 2014; 42 (12) 2972-2978
  • 24 Papannagari R, DeFrate LE, Nha KW. , et al. Function of posterior cruciate ligament bundles during in vivo knee flexion. Am J Sports Med 2007; 35 (09) 1507-1512
  • 25 Yue B, Varadarajan KM, Rubash HE, Li G. In vivo function of posterior cruciate ligament before and after posterior cruciate ligament-retaining total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 2012; 36 (07) 1387-1392
  • 26 Horiuchi H, Akizuki S, Tomita T, Sugamoto K, Yamazaki T, Shimizu N. In vivo kinematic analysis of cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty during weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing deep knee bending. J Arthroplasty 2012; 27 (06) 1196-1202
  • 27 Fujimoto E, Sasashige Y, Tomita T, Iwamoto K, Masuda Y, Hisatome T. Significant effect of the posterior tibial slope on the weight-bearing, midflexion in vivo kinematics after cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2014; 29 (12) 2324-2330