Biomechanical Comparison of Two Locking Plate Constructs Under Cyclic Loading in Four-Point Bending in a Fracture Gap Model: Two Screws versus Three Screws Per Fragment

Sophie Palierne; Baptiste Froidefond; Pascal Swider; André Autefage

doi:10.1055/s-0038-1676335

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Inhaltsverzeichnis

Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2019; 32(01): 059-066
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1676335

Original Research

Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Biomechanical Comparison of Two Locking Plate Constructs Under Cyclic Loading in Four-Point Bending in a Fracture Gap Model: Two Screws versus Three Screws Per Fragment

Authors

Sophie Palierne

¹Unité de Chirurgie, Ecole Nationale Veterinaire de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
Baptiste Froidefond

¹Unité de Chirurgie, Ecole Nationale Veterinaire de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
Pascal Swider

²Institut de Mécanique des Fluides de Toulouse UMR CNRS 5502, Toulouse, France
André Autefage

¹Unité de Chirurgie, Ecole Nationale Veterinaire de Toulouse, Toulouse, France

Abstract

Objectives The number of locking screws required per fragment during bridging osteosynthesis has not been fully determined in the dog. The purpose of this study was to assess the survival of two constructs, with either two or three screws per fragment, under cyclic bending.

Methods A 10-hole, 3.5-mm stainless steel locking compression plate was fixed 1 mm away from a bone surrogate in which the fracture gap was 47 mm. Two groups of 10 constructs, prepared with either two or three bicortical locking screws placed at the extremities of each fragment, were tested in a load-controlled 4-point bending test (range 0.7 to + 7 Nm) until failure.

Results The 3-screw constructs were stiffer than the 2-screw constructs (19.73 ± 0.68 N/mm vs. 15.52 ± 0.51 N/mm respectively) and the interfragmentary relative displacements were higher for the 2-screw constructs (11.17 ± 0.88%) than for the 3-screw constructs (8.00 ± 0.45%). The difference between the number of cycles to failure for the 3-screw constructs (162,448 ± 30,073 cycles) and the 2-screw constructs (143,786 ± 10,103 cycles) was not significant. Failure in all constructs was due to plate fracture at the level of the compression holes.

Clinical Significance Omission of the third innermost locking screw during bridging osteosynthesis subjected to bending forces led to a 20% reduction in construct stiffness and increased relative displacement (+39.6%) but did not change fatigue life.

Keywords

cyclic loading - locking plate - bending - fatigue life

Volltext

Referenzen

References
1 Harasen G. Common long bone fracture in small animal practice--part 2. Can Vet J 2003; 44 (06) 503-504
2 Harasen G. Common long bone fractures in small animal practice--part 1. Can Vet J 2003; 44 (04) 333-334
3 Johnson JA, Austin C, Breur GJ. Incidence of canine appendicular musculoskeletal disorders in 16 veterinary teaching hospitals from 1980 through 1989. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1994; 7 (02) 56-69
4 Guiot LP, Déjardin LM. Prospective evaluation of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis in 36 nonarticular tibial fractures in dogs and cats. Vet Surg 2011; 40 (02) 171-182
5 Hudson CC, Pozzi A, Lewis DD. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis: applications and techniques in dogs and cats. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2009; 22 (03) 175-182
6 Stoffel K, Dieter U, Stachowiak G, Gächter A, Kuster MS. Biomechanical testing of the LCP--how can stability in locked internal fixators be controlled?. Injury 2003; 34 (Suppl. 02) B11-B19
7 Gautier E, Sommer C. Guidelines for the clinical application of the LCP. Injury 2003; 34 (Suppl. 02) B63-B76
8 Sommer C, Gautier E, Müller M, Helfet DL, Wagner M. First clinical results of the Locking Compression Plate (LCP). Injury 2003; 34 (Suppl. 02) B43-B54
9 Wagner M. General principles for the clinical use of the LCP. Injury 2003; 34 (Suppl. 02) B31-B42
10 Barnhart MD, Rides CF, Kennedy SC. , et al. Fracture repair using a polyaxial locking plate system (PAX). Vet Surg 2013; 42 (01) 60-66
11 Haaland PJ, Sjöström L, Devor M, Haug A. Appendicular fracture repair in dogs using the locking compression plate system: 47 cases. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2009; 22 (04) 309-315
12 Nicetto T, Petazzoni M, Urizzi A, Isola M. Experiences using the Fixin locking plate system for the stabilization of appendicular fractures in dogs: a clinical and radiographic retrospective assessment. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2013; 26 (01) 61-68
13 Voss K, Kull M, Hässig M, Montavon P. Repair of long-bone fractures in cats and small dogs with the Unilock mandible locking plate system. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2009; 22 (05) 398-405
14 Bilmont A, Palierne S, Verset M, Swider P, Autefage A. Biomechanical comparison of two locking plate constructs under cyclic torsional loading in a fracture gap model. Two screws versus three screws per fragment. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2015; 28 (05) 323-330
15 Acker BT, Torrance B, Kowaleski MP, Boudrieau RJ. Structural properties of synthetic bone models compared to native canine bone. Paper presented at: 19th Annual Scientific Meeting of European College of Veterinary Surgeons; July 1-3, 2010; Helsinki, Finland
16 Cabassu JB, Kowaleski MP, Skorinko JK, Blake CA, Gaudette GR, Boudrieau RJ. Single cycle to failure in torsion of three standard and five locking plate constructs. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2011; 24 (06) 418-425
17 Déjardin LM, Lansdowne JL, Sinnott MT, Sidebotham CG, Haut RC. In vitro mechanical evaluation of torsional loading in simulated canine tibiae for a novel hourglass-shaped interlocking nail with a self-tapping tapered locking design. Am J Vet Res 2006; 67 (04) 678-685
18 Gautier E, Perren SM, Cordey J. Strain distribution in plated and unplated sheep tibia an in vivo experiment. Injury 2000; 31 (Suppl. 03) C37-C44
19 ASTM F382-99 (2008) American Society for Testing and Materials. Standard Specification and Test Method for Metallic Bone Plates. West Conshohocken, PA, United States: ASTM International; 2008. Available at: www.astm.org
20 Floerkemeier T, Wellmann M, Thorey F, Hurschler C, Witte F, Windhagen H. Comparison of bone mineral parameter measurements by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry with bone stiffness measurements as indicators of the load-bearing capacity of regenerating bone. J Orthop Trauma 2010; 24 (03) 181-187
21 Lieger O, Schaller B, Bürki A, Büchler P. Biomechanical evaluation of different angle-stable locking plate systems for mandibular surgery. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2015; 43 (08) 1589-1594
22 Pater TJ, Grindel SI, Schmeling GJ, Wang M. Stability of unicortical locked fixation versus bicortical non-locked fixation for forearm fractures. Bone Res 2014; 2: 14014
23 Pearson T, Glyde M, Hosgood G, Day R. The effect of intramedullary pin size and monocortical screw configuration on locking compression plate-rod constructs in an in vitro fracture gap model. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2015; 28 (02) 95-103
24 Kanchanomai C, Phiphobmongkol V, Muanjan P. Fatigue failure of an orthopedic implant - a locking compression plate. Eng Fail Anal 2008; 15 (05) 521-530
25 Bottlang M, Doornink J, Fitzpatrick DC, Madey SM. Far cortical locking can reduce stiffness of locked plating constructs while retaining construct strength. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009; 91 (08) 1985-1994
26 Doornink J, Fitzpatrick DC, Boldhaus S, Madey SM, Bottlang M. Effects of hybrid plating with locked and nonlocked screws on the strength of locked plating constructs in the osteoporotic diaphysis. J Trauma 2010; 69 (02) 411-417
27 Estes C, Rhee P, Shrader MW, Csavina K, Jacofsky MC, Jacofsky DJ. Biomechanical strength of the Peri-Loc proximal tibial plate: a comparison of all-locked versus hybrid locked/nonlocked screw configurations. J Orthop Trauma 2008; 22 (05) 312-316
28 Fitzpatrick DC, Doornink J, Madey SM, Bottlang M. Relative stability of conventional and locked plating fixation in a model of the osteoporotic femoral diaphysis. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2009; 24 (02) 203-209
29 Zlowodzki M, Williamson S, Cole PA, Zardiackas LD, Kregor PJ. Biomechanical evaluation of the less invasive stabilization system, angled blade plate, and retrograde intramedullary nail for the internal fixation of distal femur fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2004; 18 (08) 494-502
30 Hak DJ, Althausen P, Hazelwood SJ. Locked plate fixation of osteoporotic humeral shaft fractures: are two locking screws per segment enough?. J Orthop Trauma 2010; 24 (04) 207-211
31 Claes LE, Heigele CA. Magnitudes of local stress and strain along bony surfaces predict the course and type of fracture healing. J Biomech 1999; 32 (03) 255-266
32 Comiskey DP, Macdonald BJ, McCartney WT, Synnott K, O'Byrne J. The role of interfragmentary strain on the rate of bone healing-a new interpretation and mathematical model. J Biomech 2010; 43 (14) 2830-2834
33 Charalambous CP, Siddique I, Valluripalli K. , et al. Proximal humeral internal locking system (PHILOS) for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2007; 127 (03) 205-210
34 Schütz M, Müller M, Krettek C. , et al. Minimally invasive fracture stabilization of distal femoral fractures with the LISS: a prospective multicenter study. Results of a clinical study with special emphasis on difficult cases. Injury 2001; 32 (Suppl. 03) SC48-SC54
35 Ahmad M, Nanda R, Bajwa AS, Candal-Couto J, Green S, Hui AC. Biomechanical testing of the locking compression plate: when does the distance between bone and implant significantly reduce construct stability?. Injury 2007; 38 (03) 358-364