Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2019; 32(03): 166-170
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1677003
Review Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Postoperative Ileus

Cristina R. Harnsberger
1   Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of Massachusetts, Boston, Massachusetts
,
Justin A. Maykel
1   Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of Massachusetts, Boston, Massachusetts
,
Karim Alavi
1   Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of Massachusetts, Boston, Massachusetts
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
02. April 2019 (online)

Abstract

Postoperative ileus (POI) is a common complication following colon and rectal surgery, with reported incidence ranging from 10 to 30%. It can lead to increased morbidity, cost, and length of stay. Although definitions vary considerably in the literature, in its pathologic form, it can be characterized by a temporary inhibition of gastrointestinal motility after surgical intervention due to nonmechanical causes that prevents sufficient oral intake. Various risk factors for development of POI have been identified including increasing age, American Society of Anesthesiologists scores 3 to 4, open approach, operative difficulty, operative duration more than 3 hours, bowel handling, drop in hematocrit or need for a transfusion, increasing crystalloid administration, and delayed mobilization. While treatment is expectant and supportive, significant investigations into strategies to mitigate development of POI or shorten its duration have been undertaken with mixed results. There is significant evidence to suggest that a minimally invasive approach and multimodal pain regimens reduce the development of POI. The beneficial effect of chewing gum, alvimopan, and enhanced recovery after surgery protocols may decrease development of POI in selected groups of patients who undergo elective colorectal surgery, and shorten time to return of bowel function, but overall, the data remain inconclusive.

 
  • References

  • 1 Wolthuis AM, Bislenghi G, Fieuws S, de Buck van Overstraeten A, Boeckxstaens G, D'Hoore A. Incidence of prolonged postoperative ileus after colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis 2016; 18 (01) O1-O9
  • 2 Venara A, Neunlist M, Slim K. , et al. Postoperative ileus: pathophysiology, incidence, and prevention. J Visc Surg 2016; 153 (06) 439-446
  • 3 Gero D, Gié O, Hübner M, Demartines N, Hahnloser D. Postoperative ileus: in search of an international consensus on definition, diagnosis, and treatment. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2017; 402 (01) 149-158
  • 4 Artinyan A, Nunoo-Mensah JW, Balasubramaniam S. , et al. Prolonged postoperative ileus-definition, risk factors, and predictors after surgery. World J Surg 2008; 32 (07) 1495-1500
  • 5 Bragg D, El-Sharkawy AM, Psaltis E, Maxwell-Armstrong CA, Lobo DN. Postoperative ileus: recent developments in pathophysiology and management. Clin Nutr 2015; 34 (03) 367-376
  • 6 Vather R, O'Grady G, Bissett IP, Dinning PG. Postoperative ileus: mechanisms and future directions for research. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 2014; 41 (05) 358-370
  • 7 Vather R, Bissett IP. Risk factors for the development of prolonged post-operative ileus following elective colorectal surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis 2013; 28 (10) 1385-1391
  • 8 Grass F, Slieker J, Jurt J. , et al. Postoperative ileus in an enhanced recovery pathway-a retrospective cohort study. Int J Colorectal Dis 2017; 32 (05) 675-681
  • 9 Vather R, Josephson R, Jaung R, Robertson J, Bissett I. Development of a risk stratification system for the occurrence of prolonged postoperative ileus after colorectal surgery: a prospective risk factor analysis. Surgery 2015; 157 (04) 764-773
  • 10 Schwenk W, Böhm B, Haase O, Junghans T, Müller JM. Laparoscopic versus conventional colorectal resection: a prospective randomised study of postoperative ileus and early postoperative feeding. Langenbecks Arch Surg 1998; 383 (01) 49-55
  • 11 Fujii S, Ishibe A, Ota M. , et al. Short-term results of a randomized study between laparoscopic and open surgery in elderly colorectal cancer patients. Surg Endosc 2014; 28 (02) 466-476
  • 12 Ng WQ, Neill J. Evidence for early oral feeding of patients after elective open colorectal surgery: a literature review. J Clin Nurs 2006; 15 (06) 696-709
  • 13 MacKay G, Ihedioha U, McConnachie A, Serpell M, Molloy RG, O'Dwyer PJ. Laparoscopic colonic resection in fast-track patients does not enhance short-term recovery after elective surgery. Colorectal Dis 2007; 9 (04) 368-372
  • 14 Carmichael JC, Keller DS, Baldini G. , et al. Clinical practice guidelines for enhanced recovery after colon and rectal surgery from the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons and Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons. Dis Colon Rectum 2017; 60 (08) 761-784
  • 15 Xu LL, Zhou XQ, Yi PS, Zhang M, Li J, Xu MQ. Alvimopan combined with enhanced recovery strategy for managing postoperative ileus after open abdominal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Surg Res 2016; 203 (01) 211-221
  • 16 Nair A. Alvimopan for post-operative ileus: what we should know?. Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan 2016; 54 (03) 97-98
  • 17 Adam MA, Lee LM, Kim J. , et al. Alvimopan provides additional improvement in outcomes and cost savings in enhanced recovery colorectal surgery. Ann Surg 2016; 264 (01) 141-146
  • 18 Keller DS, Flores-Gonzalez JR, Ibarra S, Mahmood A, Haas EM. Is there value in alvimopan in minimally invasive colorectal surgery?. Am J Surg 2016; 212 (05) 851-856
  • 19 Vather R, Josephson R, Jaung R, Kahokehr A, Sammour T, Bissett I. Gastrografin in prolonged postoperative ileus: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 2015; 262 (01) 23-30
  • 20 Chen JY, Ko TL, Wen YR. , et al. Opioid-sparing effects of ketorolac and its correlation with the recovery of postoperative bowel function in colorectal surgery patients: a prospective randomized double-blinded study. Clin J Pain 2009; 25 (06) 485-489
  • 21 Sim R, Cheong DM, Wong KS, Lee BM, Liew QY. Prospective randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of pre- and postoperative administration of a COX-2-specific inhibitor as opioid-sparing analgesia in major colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 2007; 9 (01) 52-60
  • 22 Wallström A, Frisman GH. Facilitating early recovery of bowel motility after colorectal surgery: a systematic review. J Clin Nurs 2014; 23 (1-2): 24-44
  • 23 Hughes MJ, Ventham NT, McNally S, Harrison E, Wigmore S. Analgesia after open abdominal surgery in the setting of enhanced recovery surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Surg 2014; 149 (12) 1224-1230
  • 24 Halabi WJ, Kang CY, Nguyen VQ. , et al. Epidural analgesia in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a nationwide analysis of use and outcomes. JAMA Surg 2014; 149 (02) 130-136
  • 25 daSilva M, Lomelin D, Tsui J, Klinginsmith M, Tadaki C, Langenfeld S. Pain control for laparoscopic colectomy: an analysis of the incidence and utility of epidural analgesia compared to conventional analgesia. Tech Coloproctol 2015; 19 (09) 515-520
  • 26 Liu H, Hu X, Duan X, Wu J. Thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) vs. patient controlled analgesia (PCA) in laparoscopic colectomy: a meta-analysis. Hepatogastroenterology 2014; 61 (133) 1213-1219
  • 27 Pedrazzani C, Menestrina N, Moro M. , et al. Local wound infiltration plus transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block versus local wound infiltration in laparoscopic colorectal surgery and ERAS program. Surg Endosc 2016; 30 (11) 5117-5125
  • 28 Keller DS, Ermlich BO, Schiltz N. , et al. The effect of transversus abdominis plane blocks on postoperative pain in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2014; 57 (11) 1290-1297
  • 29 Charlton S, Cyna AM, Middleton P, Griffiths JD. Perioperative transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks for analgesia after abdominal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; (12) CD007705
  • 30 Shum NF, Choi HK, Mak JC, Foo DC, Li WC, Law WL. Randomized clinical trial of chewing gum after laparoscopic colorectal resection. Br J Surg 2016; 103 (11) 1447-1452