Pediatrician Attitudes toward Digital Voice Assistant Technology Use in Clinical PracticeFunding This study was supported by NIH grants K23AI106945 and R01 ES030100 (PI: J.M.G.).
11 December 2018
17 March 2019
01 May 2019 (online)
Objective Digital voice assistant technology provides unique opportunities to enhance clinical practice. We aimed to understand factors influencing pediatric providers' current and potential use of this technology in clinical practice.
Methods We surveyed pediatric providers regarding current use and interest in voice technology in the workplace. Regression analyses evaluated provider characteristics associated with voice technology use. Among respondents not interested in voice technology, we elicited individual concerns.
Results Among 114 respondents, 19 (16.7%) indicated current use of voice technology in clinical practice, and 51 (44.7%) indicated use of voice technology for nonclinical purposes. Fifty-four (47.4%) reported willingness to try digital voice assistant technology in the clinical setting. Providers who had longer clinic visits (odds ratio [OR], 3.11, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04, 9.33, p = 0.04), fewer patient encounters per day (p = 0.02), and worked in hospital-based practices (OR, 2.95, 95% CI, 1.08, 8.07, p = 0.03) were more likely to currently use voice technology in the office. Younger providers (p = 0.02) and those confident in the accuracy of voice technology (OR, 3.05, 95% CI, 1.38, 6.74, p = 0.005) were more willing to trial digital voice assistants in the clinical setting. Among respondents unwilling or unsure about trying voice assistant technology, the most common reasons elicited were concerns related to its accuracy (35%), efficiency (33%), and privacy (28%).
Conclusion This national survey evaluating use and attitudes toward digital voice assistant technology by pediatric providers found that while only one-eighth of pediatric providers currently use digital voice assistant technology in the clinical setting, almost half are interested in trying it in the future. Younger provider age and confidence in the accuracy of voice technology are associated with provider interest in using voice technology in the clinical setting. Future development of voice technology for clinical use will need to consider accuracy of information, efficiency of use, and patient privacy for successful integration into the workplace.
Keywordsmobile health - human–computer interaction - speech recognition software - workflow - pediatrics
Protection of Human and Animal Subjects
This study was reviewed by the Boston Children's Hospital Institutional Review Board (IRB), and was deemed exempt from IRB oversight.
- 1 Jones SS, Rudin RS, Perry T, Shekelle PG. Health information technology: an updated systematic review with a focus on meaningful use. Ann Intern Med 2014; 160 (01) 48-54
- 2 Shanafelt TD, Dyrbye LN, Sinsky C. , et al. Relationship between clerical burden and characteristics of the electronic environment with physician burnout and professional satisfaction. Mayo Clin Proc 2016; 91 (07) 836-848
- 3 Jamoom EW, Heisey-Grove D, Yang N, Scanlon P. Physician opinions about EHR use by EHR experience and by whether the practice had optimized its EHR use. J Health Med Inform 2016; 7 (04) 1000240
- 4 Middleton B, Bloomrosen M, Dente MA. , et al; American Medical Informatics Association. Enhancing patient safety and quality of care by improving the usability of electronic health record systems: recommendations from AMIA. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2013; 20 (e1): e2-e8
- 5 Ratwani R, Fairbanks T, Savage E. , et al. Mind the gap. A systematic review to identify usability and safety challenges and practices during electronic health record implementation. Appl Clin Inform 2016; 7 (04) 1069-1087
- 6 Wilbanks BA, Moss J. Evidence-based guidelines for interface design for data entry in electronic health records. Comput Inform Nurs 2018; 36 (01) 35-44
- 7 Collier R. Rethinking EHR interfaces to reduce click fatigue and physician burnout. CMAJ 2018; 190 (33) E994-E995
- 8 Wagner P. . Siri remains the most used mobile voice assistant. Statista; June 29, 2018 . Available at: https://www.statista.com/chart/14505/market-share-of-voice-assistants-in-the-us . Accessed January 1, 2019
- 9 Olmstead K. . Nearly half of Americans use digital voice assistants, mostly on their smartphones. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center; December 12, 2017 . Available at: http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/12/12/nearly-half-of-americans-use-digital-voice-assistants-mostly-on-their-smartphones . Accessed August 7, 2018
- 10 Amazon Echo & Google Home to reside in over 50% of US households by 2022 as multi-assistant devices take off. Hampshire, UK: Juniper Research; November 8, 2017 . Available at: https://www.juniperresearch.com/press/press-releases/amazon-echo-google-home-to-reside . Accessed August 7, 2018
- 11 Kumah-Crystal YA, Pirtle CJ, Whyte HM, Goode ES, Anders SH, Lehmann CU. Electronic health record interactions through voice: a review. Appl Clin Inform 2018; 9 (03) 541-552
- 12 Sherrard H, Duchesne L, Wells G, Kearns SA, Struthers C. Using interactive voice response to improve disease management and compliance with acute coronary syndrome best practice guidelines: a randomized controlled trial. Can J Cardiovasc Nurs 2015; 25 (01) 10-15
- 13 Heapy AA, Higgins DM, Goulet JL. , et al. Interactive voice response-based self-management for chronic back pain: the COPES Noninferiority Randomized Trial. JAMA Intern Med 2017; 177 (06) 765-773
- 14 Rose GL, Skelly JM, Badger GJ, Naylor MR, Helzer JE. Interactive voice response for relapse prevention following cognitive-behavioral therapy for alcohol use disorders: a pilot study. Psychol Serv 2012; 9 (02) 174-184
- 15 Adams WG, Phillips BD, Bacic JD, Walsh KE, Shanahan CW, Paasche-Orlow MK. Automated conversation system before pediatric primary care visits: a randomized trial. Pediatrics 2014; 134 (03) e691-e699
- 16 Siwicki B. Special Report: AI voice assistants making an impact in healthcare. Healthcare IT News. February 1, 2018 . Available at: https://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/special-report-ai-voice-assistants-making-impact-healthcare . Accessed January 1, 2019
- 17 Hill Jr RG, Sears LM, Melanson SW. 4000 clicks: a productivity analysis of electronic medical records in a community hospital ED. Am J Emerg Med 2013; 31 (11) 1591-1594
- 18 Donovan F. Amazon's Alexa healthcare team bones up on HIPAA compliance. Health IT Security. May 14, 2018 . Available at: https://healthitsecurity.com/news/amazons-alexa-healthcare-team-bones-up-on-hipaa-compliance . Accessed January 1, 2019
- 19 McCluskey PD. Meet Eva, the voice-activated ‘assistant’ for doctors. Boston Globe;January 9, 2018 . Available at: https://www.bostonglobe.com/business/2018/01/09/meet-eva-voice-activated-assistant-for-doctors/uvvvtEvOu8R3SC2AhIC8xI/story.html . Accessed January 1, 2019
- 20 Boyd M, Wilson N. Just ask Siri? A pilot study comparing smartphone digital assistants and laptop Google searches for smoking cessation advice. PLoS One 2018; 13 (03) e0194811
- 21 Miner AS, Milstein A, Schueller S, Hegde R, Mangurian C, Linos E. Smartphone-based conversational agents and responses to questions about mental health, interpersonal violence, and physical health. JAMA Intern Med 2016; 176 (05) 619-625
- 22 National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. National Asthma Education and Prevention Program. Expert Panel Report 3: Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma; 2007